Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 09:47 PM Dec 2014

Ayn Rand personally profited from FDR's New Deal

http://factually.gizmodo.com/ayn-rand-personally-profited-from-new-deal-programs-1666816582

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--bwEn-4WL--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/lzvcniyd8lxnypagxmj3.jpg

In 1936 Ayn Rand was no fan of Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal programs. So it may come as a surprise to fans of Rand that the libertarian icon took money from the Works Progress Administration's Federal Theatre Project. Like a lot of money.

Rand's courtroom drama "Night of January 16th" closed in New York in April of 1936 after a seven month run. She then sold performance rights to the WPA, ensuring she'd get $10 per show — bringing in "a small fortune" for her throughout the late 1930s. The play was staged in theaters big and small around the entire country.

The gimmicky production centers around a courtroom trial that was not unlike a theatrical Choose Your Own Adventure. Twelve men were selected each night from the audience to play the roles of jurors. These men were sometimes even paid for their troubles as if it were a real jury. They were free to decide on the case like it was an actual trial and the end of the play changed from night to night. Rand wrote different endings depending on the possible decisions of the jury.

The lone Rand biography that seems to mention the fact that she profited so nicely at the hands of the government is the book Ayn Rand and the World She Made by Anne C. Heller. The book notes that Rand was getting paid handsomely for her play, earning royalties of anywhere between $200 and $1,200 a week. To put that in perspective, the average American was earning about $1,500 a year. Damn moochers.


====================

actually fits in with her philosophy quite well: take advantage of whoever you can whenever you can
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ayn Rand personally profited from FDR's New Deal (Original Post) ashling Dec 2014 OP
Who didn't? nt onehandle Dec 2014 #1
Do as I say, not as I do. eom Jamaal510 Dec 2014 #2
100 percent Ink Man Dec 2014 #3
It's not Atlas who carries the world on his shoulders... Octafish Dec 2014 #4
She had a true criminal mind and influenced many from Hollywood to D.C. As Sagan said: freshwest Dec 2014 #5

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. She had a true criminal mind and influenced many from Hollywood to D.C. As Sagan said:
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:32 AM
Dec 2014
...An extraterrestrial being, newly arrived on Earth - scrutinizing what we mainly present to our children in television, radio, movies, newspapers, magazines, the comics, and many books - might easily conclude that we are intent on teaching them murder, rape, cruelty, superstition, credulity, and consumerism.

We keep at it, and through constant repetition, many of them finally get it. What kind of society could we create if, instead, we drummed into them science and a sense of hope?


~ Carl Sagan

Think for a few moments, what he is really saying there. Those are very important concepts he is laying out that show where we were going wrong.

We should investigate and evaluate all we are being sold by media. It's a purposeful product, it is not an accident, made to profit owners of media, not us. People get aggravated when others try to turn them away from it, since it's highly addictive.

And the place it's all working out is in our brains, our hearts, our society and how we treat the world and each other. Not that there weren't other means prior to modern media, but they used rote learning, brute force and superstition. There was not as much of a surrender and embracing of it then, as now.

They didn't have the advantage of persuasive psychological techniques that the ubiquitous entity we call mass media has.
Every sound, music, tone of voice, background imagery, the normalization of things at one considered abhorrent, made to appear to be the only choice, is now normalized. That is why there is little outrage anymore.

Think back years in one's life, how people have morphed into a state where brutality, cruelty and deception is now thought to be just a way of negotiating to get what one wants, and seeing others humiliated and abused is considered to be entertaining, even amusing. And they won't be denied it. Sagan was right.

We become what we think about.

~ Earl Nightingale

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ayn Rand personally profi...