General Discussion

DonViejo

(60,536 posts) Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:48 PM Dec 2014

What? Pat Robertson predicts gays will go extinct ‘because they don’t reproduce’

DAVID EDWARDS
17 DEC 2014 AT 12:39 ET

Christian Broadcasting Network host Pat Robertson on Wednesday predicted that gay men and lesbians would eventually “die out because they don’t reproduce.”

On Wednesday’s 700 Club, a woman named Crystal complained that her church had banned dating, and it considered showing interest in the opposite sex a “sin.” She said that the only married members of the church were people who had met their spouses before joining.

According to Robertson, this church faced the same threat as the LGBT community: extinction.

“You know, those who are homosexual will die out because they don’t reproduce,” the TV preacher opined. “You know, you have to have heterosexual sex to reproduce.”

more
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/what-pat-robertson-predicts-gays-will-go-extinct-because-they-dont-reproduce/

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What? Pat Robertson predicts gays will go extinct ‘because they don’t reproduce’ (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2014 OP

Did he preface that with "I'm not a scientist, but ... " ... ?? JoePhilly Dec 2014 #1

Jesus- he is really losing it Beaverhausen Dec 2014 #2

Really? GeorgeGist Dec 2014 #3

Maybe he's still pondering the question about chickens and eggs and which one came first. Arkansas Granny Dec 2014 #6

Hang it up, Pat! Frustratedlady Dec 2014 #4

I repeat; this is the only proper response to the religulously insane: hifiguy Dec 2014 #5

So, Pat, how come Gays are still here after thousands of years of not reproducing? Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #7

There's six billion people in the world, Pat. Initech Dec 2014 #8

His knowledge of biology Turbineguy Dec 2014 #9

Pat Robertson continues to be a fountain of wisdom and knowledge. Kaleva Dec 2014 #10

If there were such a thing as a single "gay" gene, then Pat would probably be correct. dawg Dec 2014 #11

So, Pat, are new priests the offspring of altar boys and old priests? 11 Bravo Dec 2014 #12

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)

1. Did he preface that with "I'm not a scientist, but ... " ... ??

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:49 PM

Dec 2014

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)

2. Jesus- he is really losing it

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:51 PM

Dec 2014

How does he think the homosexuals get here in the first place?

GeorgeGist

(25,311 posts)

3. Really?

Reply to Beaverhausen (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:53 PM

Dec 2014

Arkansas Granny

(31,506 posts)

6. Maybe he's still pondering the question about chickens and eggs and which one came first.

Reply to Beaverhausen (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 17, 2014, 03:30 PM

Dec 2014

Yes, he is really losing it.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)

4. Hang it up, Pat!

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Wed Dec 17, 2014, 02:58 PM

Dec 2014

I knew he was stupid, but I think this comment takes the prize. He needs to retire and watch fish swim around an aquarium for entertainment. He's on his way to happy land.