Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 10:36 PM Dec 2014

[NYPD] we have.....become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act according

A statement purporting to be from the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, the biggest police union, blamed Mr. de Blasio for the shootings.

“The mayor’s hands are literally dripping with our blood because of his words, actions and policies,” read the statement, “and we have, for the first time in a number of years, become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act accordingly.”

The statement instructed officers to forward it to colleagues, and it spread instantly through the department.

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/brooklyn-police-shooting-live-blog/

The complete statement

The New York Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, the NYPD's union, has issued this statement following the deaths of two police officers in an ambush:

"Starting IMMEDIATELY: At least two units are to respond to EVERY call, no matter the condition or severity, no matter what type of job is pending, or what the opinion of the patrol supervisor happens to be.

“IN ADDITION: Absolutely NO enforcement action in the form of arrests and or summonses is to be taken unless absolutely necessary and an individual MUST be placed under arrest.

“These are precautions that were taken in the 1970's when police officers were ambushed and executed on a regular basis.

“The mayor’s hands are literally dripping with our blood because of his words actions and policies and we have, for the first time in a number of years, become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act accordingly.”

162 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
[NYPD] we have.....become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act according (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 OP
There is something VERY wrong with the NYPD sakabatou Dec 2014 #1
some thoughts Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #5
f that. they have no jurisdiction outside NYC right? elehhhhna Dec 2014 #110
Which is why they feel Hopemeister Dec 2014 #147
+100 NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #63
Can they do this? Horse with no Name Dec 2014 #2
NYPD needs to look in the mirror Politicalboi Dec 2014 #3
This is one union I won't support. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #4
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #103
All police unions have to go, and I am the biggest union supporter I know...the reasons are obvious NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #121
So wait daredtowork Dec 2014 #6
So they basically just declared war on the citizenship? n/t ohheckyeah Dec 2014 #7
nah'they are just telling the truth for once. easychoice Dec 2014 #34
Seattle has some dirty cops. nilesobek Dec 2014 #71
imo drug testing is a violation of rights UNLESS you're carrying a weapon. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #112
They are just making public what has already avebury Dec 2014 #39
thanks -Im reading it now and ohheckyeah Dec 2014 #140
call me a conspiracy nut bettydavis Dec 2014 #67
makes one wonder n/t ohheckyeah Dec 2014 #139
When did they stop being a wartime department? Chisox08 Dec 2014 #8
Yes, they have been on war footing for quite some time Man from Pickens Dec 2014 #160
This is ridiculous octoberlib Dec 2014 #9
That sounds like middle school brer cat Dec 2014 #15
+1 And insubordination. nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #106
This message was self-deleted by its author Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #117
Calm down NYPD, the terrorist killed himself. JaneyVee Dec 2014 #10
If two of your brothers were executed....would YOU be calm? Beausoir Dec 2014 #17
They have been behaving like spoiled children since the Garner verdict BeyondGeography Dec 2014 #23
Oh it has been a whole lot longer then that. avebury Dec 2014 #40
They've probably been thoroughly corrupt Boreal Dec 2014 #68
The police unions have been aggressively pushing this nonsense. Dawson Leery Dec 2014 #52
And what's really strange about this reaction is..... socialist_n_TN Dec 2014 #127
They've been on the most grisly "winning" streak of all time BeyondGeography Dec 2014 #135
All cops disgust you? Beausoir Dec 2014 #151
No, these assholes BeyondGeography Dec 2014 #156
I sure wouldn't be declaring war on the citizens of NY... JaneyVee Dec 2014 #41
How calm were they when RW hate killed officers in Las Vegas and Pennsylvania recently? blm Dec 2014 #49
"brothers"? fuck that shit Schema Thing Dec 2014 #55
Do the police give a shit about when cops beat the shit out of people? No, they 100% defend them. nt Logical Dec 2014 #57
They're cynically using these two deaths Feral Child Dec 2014 #70
Would it mean I get to ignore the law like the NYPD? Taitertots Dec 2014 #78
Our "brothers" have been executed... Live and Learn Dec 2014 #83
I rec this response. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #137
Bull Shit. Beausoir Dec 2014 #150
That is not reality. Live and Learn Dec 2014 #162
^^^^^THIS RIGHT HERE^^^^^ Tsiyu Dec 2014 #85
The person that wrote that sounds like he's in the wrong job. Renew Deal Dec 2014 #11
We are living in interesting times... wundermaus Dec 2014 #12
Prolly a good time to go back and watch Fort Apache the bronx. Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #36
It's on YouTube Renew Deal Dec 2014 #99
arigato (thanks!) Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #101
No problem Renew Deal Dec 2014 #105
If you haven't seen this site... Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #109
if they get war it'll be guerilla warfare against them. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #114
Shouldn't the second point always be the case? Renew Deal Dec 2014 #13
Maybe this will end the stop and frisk bullshit. NutmegYankee Dec 2014 #21
That was my first takeaway, too. Nevernose Dec 2014 #44
Who the hell is in charge of the NYPD? Raine1967 Dec 2014 #14
Seeing a little bit of that in Phoenix JonLP24 Dec 2014 #27
term and condition of employment AngryAmish Dec 2014 #30
except they do it all the time unless it's cops. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #64
The NYPD did not say this. An NYPD union did. (It's not the only NYPD union, btw) Raine1967 Dec 2014 #16
here is my question SummerSnow Dec 2014 #18
My question is does the writer understand the word 'literally'? Because, what he is saying kelly1mm Dec 2014 #56
+1 NobodyHere Dec 2014 #66
Just, wow. onecaliberal Dec 2014 #19
If it's a 'wartime department,' then it's time to send in the 101st Airborne, KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #20
Exactly. De Blasio is in a position to show the country how civilians retake command of militarists. ancianita Dec 2014 #28
Whether it's De Blasio, Cuomo or Obama matters little. Police are not allowed to issue KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #33
Seriously? When have any of us ever seen that happen? And how? I'd love to read any links you have. ancianita Dec 2014 #43
Seen what happen? I've never seen the police so flagrantly KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #47
What you said police aren't allowed to do -- issue veiled threats against the public or leaders and ancianita Dec 2014 #72
I heard a guy on CNN making those kinds of comments tonight. Renew Deal Dec 2014 #50
Holy shit, that's pretty brazen. The family of Mike Brown has issued a statement unequivocally KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #62
didn't St Louis PD threaten the citizenry, too? grasswire Dec 2014 #48
treason and isurrection. heavy stuff, that. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #115
Without a doubt...stupidest post I have ever read on DU. Beausoir Dec 2014 #152
Well, my Dad got a sucking chest wound at Inchon with the USMC but that KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #158
Bouncy. Beausoir Dec 2014 #161
increase the mayor's security detail. spanone Dec 2014 #22
I would not want to be in his shoes...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #25
nor would I. spanone Dec 2014 #26
I'm pretty sure his security is the NYPD Renew Deal Dec 2014 #51
If I were de Blasio, I think I might check out getting a people's militia....... socialist_n_TN Dec 2014 #128
Declaring war on the people you are supposed to protect and serve Kalidurga Dec 2014 #24
More like an occupying army. Downwinder Dec 2014 #29
Yes it is exactly like an occupying army Kalidurga Dec 2014 #45
AMEN AND AMEN!!! Any occupying Army is an oppressive force uponit7771 Dec 2014 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Dec 2014 #31
The mayor's hands are not literally dripping with their blood ... kwassa Dec 2014 #32
Thanks. It's like fingernails scraping down a chalkboard, isn't it? Drives KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #35
Seems to be the word I hear used wrong the most often. NT Alittleliberal Dec 2014 #155
The union isn't in command.....and can't give orders. Historic NY Dec 2014 #37
If it is "wartime", then Obama must pull and Ike and Dawson Leery Dec 2014 #38
As a wartime department, they can now serve in Afghanistan and Iraq ... kwassa Dec 2014 #42
+1 Better yet, hasn't Russia been getting on our nerves lately? Live and Learn Dec 2014 #86
This statement is fucking ASTONISHING... AzDar Dec 2014 #46
Thank you. nt woo me with science Dec 2014 #61
+1 And APPALLING! nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #87
+1, yep-- I'm stunned at the arrogance. It's basically acknowledging every Marr Dec 2014 #131
Oh that's really #%^*ing helpful MannyGoldstein Dec 2014 #53
Considering..... 99Forever Dec 2014 #54
Actually, it sounds like they might just start performing their jobs correctly. Live and Learn Dec 2014 #90
I doubt their definition of "when necessary" and ours... 99Forever Dec 2014 #96
That is what they are currently doing. Live and Learn Dec 2014 #97
We'll just have to agree to disagree. 99Forever Dec 2014 #100
I don't think we disagree at all. Live and Learn Dec 2014 #102
I plead low blood caffeine level. 99Forever Dec 2014 #107
Always. I knew you were a good one already. Live and Learn Dec 2014 #108
Is this guy instigating 2naSalit Dec 2014 #58
It's obvious that the grand jury members faced intimidation ecstatic Dec 2014 #59
McCullough doesn't fear the police. SwankyXomb Dec 2014 #157
These guys absolutely must be broken, the respect for civilians and civilian command are so tenuous TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #60
The police officers who support this do not deserve to be police officers. baldguy Dec 2014 #65
It's a legitimate labor tactic with a long history Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #119
Ha, so when the police slow down, they only arrest people when necessary? Live and Learn Dec 2014 #124
Intimidation of the public is not a tactic used by just any labor union. baldguy Dec 2014 #148
Maybe time for a beer in the rose garden? Jappleseed Dec 2014 #69
Like the NYPD.. sendero Dec 2014 #73
That's a fucked up group of people with guns uponit7771 Dec 2014 #74
The PBA has a huge lack of comprehension if they can't see the connection Vinca Dec 2014 #76
When you declare war on someone, better be prepare for them to declare war on you. Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #77
Yep. That IS the flip side to that statement..... socialist_n_TN Dec 2014 #81
This is the kind of thing that happens when a department loses confidence in its leadership Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #79
good points...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #80
That sounds a lot like a threat against the Mayor. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #82
You started the War, motherfuckers Tsiyu Dec 2014 #84
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #94
So, no more Mr. Nice Guy? nt raouldukelives Dec 2014 #88
bitterly funny lol elehhhhna Dec 2014 #118
Holy fky sht LiberalElite Dec 2014 #89
war was when they were heroes Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #91
True - maybe with LiberalElite Dec 2014 #92
Further proof that 'the whole damn system is guilty as hell'. nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #93
Are two units required to go to lunch or coffee break? Autumn Dec 2014 #95
Is this union actually declaring war? And if so, on who? Live and Learn Dec 2014 #98
Officers can choose to respond slower and not arrest Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #122
I will gladly suffer all of your examples over police murdering people. nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #125
Thats because you have no experience with police strikes shaayecanaan Dec 2014 #144
+11111111111 eom Tsiyu Dec 2014 #153
And by the way, how often do police really prevent crimes at all? Live and Learn Dec 2014 #126
The police reduce crime by enforcing the law- the threat the enforcement is what dissuades more Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #132
Yeah, those drug laws sure dissuaded people Tsiyu Dec 2014 #154
Some Great examples. Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #142
Seems like they are under Faux pas Dec 2014 #104
Their reaction to this tragedy is disgusting abelenkpe Dec 2014 #111
Blaming the mayor for this is a chicknS**t way if denying their on culpability in behaviors that kelliekat44 Dec 2014 #113
What's next? Promoting racial profiling? Promoting stop and frisk? L0oniX Dec 2014 #116
Obama send in Federal troops, disarm the entire police department, right now. NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #120
The slain cops are NOT white? NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #123
I wonder about this talk of 'ambush'. I really have not riversedge Dec 2014 #130
Yeah-- and they keep calling it an "execution style" killing, too. Marr Dec 2014 #134
The details of this shooting have nothing to do with massive police abuse and NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #138
Yes, you are right riversedge Dec 2014 #143
So you ignored the shooter's instagram? former9thward Dec 2014 #133
Now police will pay the trainers to practice, the fast shoot anyone who approaches their car. Sunlei Dec 2014 #129
So they are at war with whom exactly? Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #136
It aparently does not occur to them that they are the ones who turned their "Wartime tactics" on jwirr Dec 2014 #141
. Hopemeister Dec 2014 #145
The police have been operating in war time mode for quite some time mb999 Dec 2014 #146
Wow, I guess the NYPD wants to be disbanded. They like the idea of being a rogue agency. Rex Dec 2014 #149
The PBA is denying the memo came from them . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #159

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
5. some thoughts
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 10:49 PM
Dec 2014

They are a huge force. Some describe them as a "private army".

I have my own army in the NYPD, which is the seventh biggest army in the world.
http://observer.com/2011/11/mayor-bloomberg-i-have-my-own-army-11-30-11/

They receive money directly from the financial elites.
http://wireofinformation.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/nypd-receives-4-6-milllion-usd-from-goldman-sachs-then-arrests-700-peaceful-protestors-at-occupywallstreet/

They police outside of NY.

NYPD opens branch in Kfar Saba Israel
http://www.timesofisrael.com/nypd-opens-local-branch-in-kfar-saba/

Case dismissed against NYPD over surveillance of Muslims in New Jersey
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0221/Case-dismissed-against-NYPD-over-surveillance-of-Muslims-in-New-Jersey-video

They serve as a cutout for the CIA to engage in domestic operations.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/nypd-cia-terrorism_n_934923.html

the federal government, which has given NYPD more than $1.6 billion since 9/11
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/nypd-cia-terrorism_n_934923.html

They have been given accolades as hero's since 911.

They have a very powerful union.

It's a unique beast.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
110. f that. they have no jurisdiction outside NYC right?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:30 AM
Dec 2014

Paramilitaries. I appreciate the emotional response but this is a big fu and should not stand.

Hopemeister

(24 posts)
147. Which is why they feel
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:17 PM
Dec 2014

that they should be above the law. They expect their actions to go uncheck with no balances and since people are expressing their given rights to demostrates against their excessive brutality (which I might add has gone unchecked for years) they now feel the need to make outlandish statement to prevent any push back from the community. Disgusted by it all.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
6. So wait
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 10:50 PM
Dec 2014

We are not supposed to link the NYPD's prior actions or lack there of to these police officer's deaths because that might imply they brought this on themselves, but the police union itself is freely connecting the dots to Eric Garner and continuing on the same "wartime mentality" that we're not allowed to say led them there in the first place?

Dang that is f'd up.

Everyone appreciates the importance of police safety. But couldn't that have also been accomplished by showing some contrition for Eric Garner's death and making some moves toward reconciliation with the community? This "wartime" language is the problem!!!!

btw, is the "no enforcement action" a notch up the same spectrum as "extreme discretion" yesterday? At what point does it become "why are we paying these guys to drive around"?

easychoice

(1,043 posts)
34. nah'they are just telling the truth for once.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:45 PM
Dec 2014

We have the same brand of blue haloed shitbags here in Seattle.Hmm,Big,fat,ugly ,stupid,bald headed bully? Yep.It's a Seattle cop.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
71. Seattle has some dirty cops.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 08:27 AM
Dec 2014

I remember the 80s when they framed homeless people for arson the cops were committing for insurance money.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
112. imo drug testing is a violation of rights UNLESS you're carrying a weapon.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:35 AM
Dec 2014

Alcohol drug and steroid tests for them all. Regularly and after any "incidents"

avebury

(10,951 posts)
39. They are just making public what has already
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:49 PM
Dec 2014

been going on for years.

If you have not had a chance to listen to This American Life - Right to Remain Silent podcast you should. The second part of the podcast cover Adrian Schoolcraft the NYPD cop that his fellow cops had thrown in to a Psych Ward when they realized that he had been ratting them out for their illegal behavior. It also covers what can only be deliberate falsification of police reports even hiding the fact that there was a serial rapist at one time. The guy finally came in to confess one of the rapes and when he talked to a well decorated, well respected Detective who then start looking into it he found no reports on any rapes but police reports filed for crimes at the time and place of the rapes gave no indication of rape. The whole section of the podcast dealing with the NYPD is horrifying to say the least. I am attaching a link to the site where you can listen to it. It seems like the NYPD operates like a Third World Banana Republic police force at war with the locals.

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/right-to-remain-silent

bettydavis

(93 posts)
67. call me a conspiracy nut
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:10 AM
Dec 2014

but i am sorry instantly this smacked me as strange. Why would a campaign charging racial bias by white police officers against black lives inspire an attack on two colored officers? not that lunatics ever make sense, but now suddenly there's an excuse for a cop war on the citizens of NY and an attack on the mayor who is black by association. deblasio is probably in serious danger as well as his his family. nypd is a gang. Something stinks bad about this man.

Chisox08

(1,898 posts)
8. When did they stop being a wartime department?
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 10:53 PM
Dec 2014

I have a feeling that this will be used an excuse to kill more people, and before the NYPD can say that anybody has blood dripping off of their hands they need to look at the blood pouring off of theirs first.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
160. Yes, they have been on war footing for quite some time
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:58 PM
Dec 2014

the culture of violence radiates from the police outward

I find it interesting that the NYPD feels free to make the decision to go to war without any elected decision-makers being in the loop.

Bloomberg used to brag about having the "7th largest army in the world" in the NYPD. It appears that that army has decided to go rogue!

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
9. This is ridiculous
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 10:54 PM
Dec 2014

PIX11 — Police officers turned their backs on Mayor Bill de Blasio as he walked into the police press conference about the two NYPD officers shot and killed execution-style in Brooklyn.

De Blasio weaved through the officers on his way to the presser with Police Commissioner Bill Bratton at Woodhull Hospital Saturday evening.

http://pix11.com/2014/12/20/video-nypd-officers-turn-away-from-mayor-de-blasio-as-he-enters-police-presser/

brer cat

(24,524 posts)
15. That sounds like middle school
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:09 PM
Dec 2014

not a professional police department. The last thing we need is for the police to escalate the bad feelings with the community and its leaders.

Response to brer cat (Reply #15)

BeyondGeography

(39,351 posts)
23. They have been behaving like spoiled children since the Garner verdict
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:28 PM
Dec 2014

Now they're using this tragedy to drive a false, self-serving point home. Namely, that their victims are unworthy of mayoral sympathy and their actions are always beyond public reproach. They disgust me.

 

Boreal

(725 posts)
68. They've probably been thoroughly corrupt
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:57 AM
Dec 2014

for as long as they've existed!

Remember Frank Serpico? NYPD was full of cops on the take (for HUGE money) during that period (70s, I think).

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
127. And what's really strange about this reaction is.....
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:19 PM
Dec 2014

that the cop(s) WON the Garner verdict. The cop wasn't indicted. What the FUCK would they do if a NYPD cop DID get indicted? Declare thermo-nuclear war on the city?

BeyondGeography

(39,351 posts)
135. They've been on the most grisly "winning" streak of all time
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:47 PM
Dec 2014

179 deaths caused in the last 15 years, three indictments and one conviction (with no jail time):

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/179-nypd-involved-deaths-3-indicted-exclusive-article-1.2037357

How dare anyone complain?

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
41. I sure wouldn't be declaring war on the citizens of NY...
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:56 PM
Dec 2014

For the heinous action of a lone individual.

blm

(113,015 posts)
49. How calm were they when RW hate killed officers in Las Vegas and Pennsylvania recently?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:31 AM
Dec 2014

Anyone recall them in front of cameras blaming RW media or politicians?

Vegas Cop Killers Awash in Anti-Government, Rightwing Conspiracy
Local reporting: After fatally shooting two police officers, assailants placed 'Don't Tread On Me' flags over bodies

Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
55. "brothers"? fuck that shit
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:55 AM
Dec 2014


That's a big part of the problem right there. That "brotherhood" covers each others ass for wrongdoing every.single.time.



That "brotherhood" is exactly why we are where we are.
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
57. Do the police give a shit about when cops beat the shit out of people? No, they 100% defend them. nt
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 01:08 AM
Dec 2014

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
70. They're cynically using these two deaths
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 08:20 AM
Dec 2014

to escalate their war on black citizens.

They handle this sort of case all the time, a murder/suicide where the narcissist committing suicide tries to glamorize his act by involving others.

I expected exactly this reaction from them, play it up for sympathy and press coverage.

I'll repeat: "cynically using these deaths."

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
78. Would it mean I get to ignore the law like the NYPD?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:09 AM
Dec 2014

Of course not. Why do you support police criminality?

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
83. Our "brothers" have been executed...
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:44 AM
Dec 2014

and the (still living) perpetrators not even arrested. We have chosen to protest peacefully.

Let's just be clear about who is declaring war here. It appears it is the pd not protestors.

 

Beausoir

(7,540 posts)
150. Bull Shit.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:50 AM
Dec 2014

You rob a store...attack a cop INSIDE the cop's car...punch the cop and grab for his revolver...you're gonna get shot to death.

That's not an execution.


And execution is snuffing out two cops who were sitting in their patrol car.

If you can't see the difference...YOU are the problem.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
85. ^^^^^THIS RIGHT HERE^^^^^
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:53 AM
Dec 2014

This above me is the whole ball of beans.

Garner's family should remain calm.

Mike Brown's family should remain calm.

Tamir Rice's family should remain calm.

All of the people whose family members have been murdered by police should remain calm, not declare war on the cops, etc. It's just a silly death in the family, right?

But when one looney toon individual - WHO IS DEAD NOW - kills some cops, they have the right to scream and wail and act so victimized and declare WAR ON EVERYBODY? You JUSTIFY this?

What if Brown's family had declared war on Ferguson cops? Because they lost their brother?

THIS is the problem. You cannot tell people their children's lives don't matter and then turn around and declare war because your co-workers lives DID have value.

Only a snake and a fool and a demon would believe cops lives matter any more than anyone else's.

wundermaus

(1,673 posts)
12. We are living in interesting times...
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:00 PM
Dec 2014

When the police openly declares war on the citizens... what is the next logical step?
(pin drops)

Renew Deal

(81,847 posts)
105. No problem
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:23 AM
Dec 2014

I looked for it on Netflix last night and couldn't find it. I figured YouTube would come through.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
114. if they get war it'll be guerilla warfare against them.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:42 AM
Dec 2014
might want to consider how that turns out. History. It's all there.


Renew Deal

(81,847 posts)
13. Shouldn't the second point always be the case?
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:00 PM
Dec 2014

“IN ADDITION: Absolutely NO enforcement action in the form of arrests and or summonses is to be taken unless absolutely necessary and an individual MUST be placed under arrest." Why arrest people if it's not necessary?

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
21. Maybe this will end the stop and frisk bullshit.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:24 PM
Dec 2014

But I suspect it's a "work slowdown" as a protest tactic.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
44. That was my first takeaway, too.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:06 AM
Dec 2014

But don't you realize that there are people out there who voluntarily put substances in their bodies that some other people don't think people should put in their bodies?

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
14. Who the hell is in charge of the NYPD?
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:08 PM
Dec 2014

Where the hell does this union get to dictate the NYPD policies?

This is effed up beyond belief.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
27. Seeing a little bit of that in Phoenix
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:36 PM
Dec 2014

but in fairness the police chief was fired because he gave a press conference after the city manager told him not to.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
30. term and condition of employment
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:42 PM
Dec 2014

If done collectively then you can't punish individuals for collective action.

Labor law 101

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
18. here is my question
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:20 PM
Dec 2014

“The mayor’s hands are literally dripping with our blood because of his words, actions and policies,” read the statement, “and we have, for the first time in a number of years, become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act accordingly.”


What is acting accordingly?

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
56. My question is does the writer understand the word 'literally'? Because, what he is saying
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:56 AM
Dec 2014

is that the mayor has actual physical blood on his hands that is in sufficient quantities to actually drip off.

onecaliberal

(32,783 posts)
19. Just, wow.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:20 PM
Dec 2014

The NYPD has many gallons of blood dripping from their hands. Who the fuck is in charge of these vigilante cops?

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
20. If it's a 'wartime department,' then it's time to send in the 101st Airborne,
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:23 PM
Dec 2014

declare martial law, and disarm and fire the local constabulary (whose services are no longer required).

There, problem solved.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
33. Whether it's De Blasio, Cuomo or Obama matters little. Police are not allowed to issue
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:43 PM
Dec 2014

veiled threats against the public or public officials and remain employed. WTF??????

Disarm those pigs right now before any more civilians get killed.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
47. Seen what happen? I've never seen the police so flagrantly
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:25 AM
Dec 2014

threaten the public as they have with this announcement. (Darryl Gates at the LAPD was pretty obnoxious after the initial Rodney King acquittals in Simi Valley and I seem to remember Philadlephia's Frank Rizzo being a particularly nasty piece of work.) When George H.W. Bush sent in some 5,000 federal troops in 1992 in the wake of the Rodney King uprising, those federal troops backed up the CA National Guard and the LAPD. But the LAPD had basically withdrawn from the field in disarray during the Rodney King riots. (I'm relying on memories that have dimmed somewhat with the passage of time.) So the CA National Guard and U.S. troops restored order in Los Angeles, b/c the LAPD were largely MIA.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

ancianita

(35,940 posts)
72. What you said police aren't allowed to do -- issue veiled threats against the public or leaders and
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:18 AM
Dec 2014

lose their job over it. I've never seen this happen.

Renew Deal

(81,847 posts)
50. I heard a guy on CNN making those kinds of comments tonight.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:41 AM
Dec 2014

He claimed to be retired and said that it is on DeBlasio's best interest to get along with the police. He also said protesters should be "silenced."

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
62. Holy shit, that's pretty brazen. The family of Mike Brown has issued a statement unequivocally
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 03:04 AM
Dec 2014

condemning today's murder of the two NYPD police officers as 'senseless.' Should Mike Brown's family also be 'silenced'? (Rhetorical question directed at NYPD and not at you personally.)

 

Beausoir

(7,540 posts)
152. Without a doubt...stupidest post I have ever read on DU.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:55 AM
Dec 2014

Ever.

Clearly you are a keyboard warrior with NO family members in the military.

If you had any family members with courage enough to be service persons, you would realize that they would back up their fallen brothers in a heartbeat.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
158. Well, my Dad got a sucking chest wound at Inchon with the USMC but that
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:41 AM
Dec 2014

was quite awhile back. One of my uncles was a Captain in the Army and another a Lt. Commander in the Navy.

Other than refute your neo-McCarthyite slur, I'm not going to dignify any of the rest of your post with a response, other than to ask whether you wave the bloody shirt all the time or only when you post on DU.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
128. If I were de Blasio, I think I might check out getting a people's militia.......
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:24 PM
Dec 2014

to protect me from the cops. He's a pretty wealthy guy. It should be fairly easy for him to arm them more heavily than the cops.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
45. Yes it is exactly like an occupying army
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:11 AM
Dec 2014

I just saw some footage of the Mall of America protests from today and it does not make them look good at all. There was no reason to shut anything down. There was no reason to tell people to leave. The rotunda where the most activity took place has been the stage for many famous people and there have often been crowds of that size there. This really wasn't any more or less rowdy than an event like that. But, it was protestors so they might not have been there to spend money and consume stuff. It's some interesting times we live in.

Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
32. The mayor's hands are not literally dripping with their blood ...
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:43 PM
Dec 2014

The writer of this doesn't understand the meaning of the word "literally".

These police union spokesmen are truly scary people, aside from being poor writers.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
38. If it is "wartime", then Obama must pull and Ike and
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 11:47 PM
Dec 2014

put the 101st Airborne in to deal with the corrupt local authorities.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
86. +1 Better yet, hasn't Russia been getting on our nerves lately?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:54 AM
Dec 2014

And they can bring all those toys they recently acquired from the military surplus with them.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
131. +1, yep-- I'm stunned at the arrogance. It's basically acknowledging every
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:34 PM
Dec 2014

criticism that's been of the NYPD and saying, 'what you gonna do about it'?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
54. Considering.....
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:51 AM
Dec 2014

.. that they have been waging war on the public for years.. They are ghoing to refuse to do their jobs? So what's new? Fire them when they don't perform the duties they are paid to do.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
90. Actually, it sounds like they might just start performing their jobs correctly.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:58 AM
Dec 2014
“IN ADDITION: Absolutely NO enforcement action in the form of arrests and or summonses is to be taken unless absolutely necessary and an individual MUST be placed under arrest.


Imagine that? Only arresting people when necessary?

What the hell are they doing now? Arresting them at whim?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
96. I doubt their definition of "when necessary" and ours...
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:04 AM
Dec 2014

.. are lightyears apart. "Necessary arrests" in their reptile brains is more likely to be anyone who doesn't let them walk all over Constitutional Rights.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
97. That is what they are currently doing.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:07 AM
Dec 2014

Sounds to me like they are calling for a work slow down and that includes only arresting people when absolutely necessary.

Which also sounds like an admission, to me, that they now arrest people when it is not necessary.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
100. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:15 AM
Dec 2014

I trust nothing coming from the muscle end of a corrupt system. They will use this as just another excuse to further oppress innocent citizens doing nothing illegal. THAT'S what stormtroopers do, it's what they are.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
102. I don't think we disagree at all.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:21 AM
Dec 2014

I am making fun of their admonition that they will now only make necessary arrests. As if that is a threat to us. But it really is an admonition by them that they know they abuse the system and arrest innocent people.

Do I expect the officers to do this? Not at all. I expect them to seek vengeance in the worst way.

2naSalit

(86,332 posts)
58. Is this guy instigating
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 01:58 AM
Dec 2014

insubordination or a coup? Honestly, he is giving the police force instructions for such.

ecstatic

(32,653 posts)
59. It's obvious that the grand jury members faced intimidation
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 02:29 AM
Dec 2014

If the NYPD feels comfortable openly threatening the mayor and the public, can you imagine how jury members are handled? They are so out of control and entitled, it's scary!

This incident also sheds light on why MO's McCulloch has behaved like such a callous ass. He's scared for his life!

I'm actually very concerned about the mayor's safety.

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
157. McCullough doesn't fear the police.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:22 AM
Dec 2014

He's One Of Them, just like the rest of his family. If you cut him, he'd bleed pure blue.

TheKentuckian

(25,020 posts)
60. These guys absolutely must be broken, the respect for civilians and civilian command are so tenuous
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 02:38 AM
Dec 2014

as not to exist in any practical sense.

As things seem to stand now we are leaving things like fully automatic high caliber machine guns, live grenades, and artillery in the preschool.

These fools have escalated already to the point of pretty much flat out saying that unless they are allowed to act with impunity and not only that be fawned over and worshiped for whatever abuses including flat out murder then it is "a shame about your nice city here" and a "wartime" footing.

They are far too dangerous to leave sitting around.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
119. It's a legitimate labor tactic with a long history
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:54 AM
Dec 2014

"Work to rule" or a "rule book slowdown" is a legitimate tactic that labor unions use quite often.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
124. Ha, so when the police slow down, they only arrest people when necessary?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:04 PM
Dec 2014

What the hell are they doing the rest of the time? Oh yeah, quite obviously, killing people unnecessarily.

And I have never heard any other union declare they are working under wartime provisions.

I seriously don't get how you can defend this bs.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
148. Intimidation of the public is not a tactic used by just any labor union.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:26 PM
Dec 2014

It's more like those used by the Stasi or the Gestapo.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
76. The PBA has a huge lack of comprehension if they can't see the connection
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

between the slaughter we saw on video of a guy selling loose cigarettes and this act. If they want to call it a war, I would suggest they have been waging it for a long, long time and the other side just became engaged. Both sides need to calm the fuck down and figure out how to make things better rather than worse.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
79. This is the kind of thing that happens when a department loses confidence in its leadership
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:21 AM
Dec 2014

Its nothing new to NYC. Labor actions happen in all kinds of departments.

In fact, its the exact same thing as a work slowdown by any other type of union, just a type of labor action. I know many here are hypocrites when it comes to workers rights and don't support unions for cops, but the reality is a labor action by cops is just as legitimate as one by any other group of workers. A true supporter of workers doesn't only support them for jobs they like.

I watched a neighboring agency in NC go through something similar. They had an officer disciplined for using a taser in a situation where it was 100% warranted, but it was the son of a prominent local activist who raised a stink (the son had been beating his wife, making such a scene the neighbors called 911). So the chief suspended him without pay for 3 months and has the domestic violence charges dropped. A couple of weeks later an officer was involved in a traffic accident during an emergency response and was fired- even though the dash cam showed the officer was correct and in compliance with traffic laws, and the driver of the other car did not yield to the lights and siren and in fact had headphones in. But the officer was fired anyway, because the press looked bad (child in the back seat of the other car was injured) and the chief wanted to be seen as "doing something". His justification was that the call (burglary in progress) didn't warrant an emergency response- even though response type was left to officer discretion unless directed otherwise and that agency almost always ran code for burglary in progress.

Keep in mind there was no union in this case, collective bargaining is forbidden by law in NC for all government employees.

So the officers quit running code to calls, unless it was an officer in distress. Because you could get disciplined or fired for an accident when it wasn't your fault, but couldn't get fired for taking a few minutes longer to respond in the name of safety. Why risk it if obviously the boss didn't want you to do so? Officers didn't go in to a domestic or anything else in a private residence without at least 2-3 others present- they stayed outside and said it was "too dangerous" because you could get fired for going in and ending it early using appropriate force, but couldn't get fired for playing it safe. They didn't arrest for anything unless it was a very serious crime, because making an arrest meant you might have to use force and that could get you fired, but giving a warning, not seeing the offence, writing a summons for something lessor that was just a ticket- well those were all lower risk actions. Any discrepancies with vehicles that would have been tolerated were written up as safety issues, etc.

It was essentially a "work-to-rule" of "rule-book slowdown" labor action done without a union.

Needless to say crime went up, citizens were unhappy, but the chief was stuck. His reputation was well known so he couldn't even manage to hire enough officers to replace the ones that left, so firing more was not an option. Crime was rising, citizens were unhappy with the responses and answers they got. That chief "retired" shortly thereafter.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
82. That sounds a lot like a threat against the Mayor.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:40 AM
Dec 2014

Notice how they never act like this when anti-government nuts inspired by the Tea Party kill cops.

Of course, those are usually rural cops, sheriffs, state police, etc. I suppose the politics are different in a major urban department.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
84. You started the War, motherfuckers
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:45 AM
Dec 2014


Now you don't like it because YOU have a few casualties? Perhaps if you'd charged Garner's killer with murder there wouldn't be so much anger against you murderous thugs?

You can't keep abusing people. History should teach even the lowest IQ police officer that much. You keep oppressing people and they will retaliate. Are y'all fucking STUPID? Did you not go to school, study the revolution?

Instead of declaring war, why don't you demons in blue react the way you feel Garner's and Rice's and Brown's families should have reacted. Should they have declared "war?"

FUCK YOU NYPD

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
91. war was when they were heroes
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:58 AM
Dec 2014

they're grasping for the good ole days of 911 and billion dollar infusions from the feds.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
98. Is this union actually declaring war? And if so, on who?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:12 AM
Dec 2014

And is their threat really that they will start performing their duties correctly and only arrest people when necessary? Is that an admonition that they have been arresting people without necessity?

I wonder if the media will pursue any of those questions.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
122. Officers can choose to respond slower and not arrest
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:01 PM
Dec 2014

Officers on the street have wide discretion to arrest or not, to cite or not.

Neighbor having a loud party at 3:00am? Don't call us, better just work it out between yourselves. That guy was shoplifting? Meh, its a he said/he said not enough evidence to arrest. That car came back stolen when I ran the tag, but it's really crowded today so chasing them is more danger than its worth. Domestic dispute called in? Sounds like the guy could be violent in the name of safety better stay outside until lots and lots of backup is here.

Littering? I didn't see that. Public intoxication? I think my intoxalyzer is out of calibration, can't prove it.

I think the steering on this car is wobbly, can't drive it. Wow, seems like 3/4 of the patrol cars have safety issues today. Damm radios are very scratchy too.

If people hate the police, let them live a few weeks with no or minimal police.

"Work to rule" or a "rule book slowdown" is a legitimate tactic that labor unions use quite often.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
126. And by the way, how often do police really prevent crimes at all?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:13 PM
Dec 2014

They don't. Try calling them before a crime has happened. They are useless then. Their only service is to arrest people after a crime has been committed.

And, many of those arrested would not commit more crimes if they weren't arrested and didn't have records preventing them from getting jobs and services.

In all, I am not sure officers are doing us much of a service at all.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
132. The police reduce crime by enforcing the law- the threat the enforcement is what dissuades more
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:38 PM
Dec 2014

That is why we have laws in the first place, and laws without enforcement are useless.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
154. Yeah, those drug laws sure dissuaded people
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:09 AM
Dec 2014

Addicts are particularly dissuaded.

And since we declared "WAR ON DRUGS POOR PEOPLE USE" there is more drug use than ever.

Hilarious........


Faux pas

(14,645 posts)
104. Seems like they are under
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:22 AM
Dec 2014

the impression they are in charge and have no need to answer to anyone. Yikes!

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
111. Their reaction to this tragedy is disgusting
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:34 AM
Dec 2014

And self serving. Nothing erases the fact that the NYPD has been seen on video repeatedly murdering an unarmed man suspected of selling cigarettes and gotten away with denying his family the chance of a trial. That they would immediately twist these horrible murders by a clearly unbalanced lunatic into a justification for their behavior, and as a way of attacking and blaming perceived political foes like the mayor and president is disgusting. I've read articles and posts where the mayor and president are being accused of starting a race war. For what? Expressing concern that maybe after so very many instances of unarmed black people being killed by police that officers treat people of color differently? This is absolutely insane. It's disgusting that they would use the tragedy to attack protestors and officials who have questioned their tactics.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
113. Blaming the mayor for this is a chicknS**t way if denying their on culpability in behaviors that
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:38 AM
Dec 2014

have turned citizens, especially black and other minorities against them. They want an excuse to be more brutal and lawless than ever. This is dangerous for all citizens across the country if it is not stopped right now. The Mayor did or said nothing that evoked this assassination. This was a crazed gunman who wanted any excuse to kill cops. The white militia man who shot and killed cops and the other whites who killed cops sitting a restaurant were acting on their own and neither the Mayor of NY or the President had anything to do with those incidents either. FOX is enraging the pro cop community just as a way to get back at Obama and anyone with an ounce of sense will see it for what it is.

Law abiding citizens need to nip this in the bud and stand behind elected officials who are not afraid or ashamed to come out against police brutality and police corruption. The people need to sand united against police terrorism as well as criminals who would shoot police in vengeance. AND FOX "News" needs to be blasted for inflaming the situation.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
123. The slain cops are NOT white?
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:03 PM
Dec 2014

Who says the slayings has anything to do with Garner etal?

I mean, if you were gonna shoot cops due to that, wouldnt you shoot white cops?

riversedge

(70,091 posts)
130. I wonder about this talk of 'ambush'. I really have not
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:33 PM
Dec 2014

read anything that the killer drew these particular cops to the scene and then ambushed them (killed them). The cops just happened to be tragically at the wrong spot at the wrong time. Am I missing something?

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
134. Yeah-- and they keep calling it an "execution style" killing, too.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:43 PM
Dec 2014

I thought that was killing someone who was already under your complete physical control, ie, kneeling and turned away. I've never heard it applied to someone spraying a car with bullets.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
138. The details of this shooting have nothing to do with massive police abuse and
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dec 2014

the shooting of black people.

Nothing whatsoever, regardless of this guys motives, has nothing to do with it

but you can be it will be used to distract and excuse etc

the shooter may have said he wanted to avenge the deaths of certain people, so what...he is one fucking person, his actions while atrocious and abhorrent have nothing to do with the problem we still must address

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
129. Now police will pay the trainers to practice, the fast shoot anyone who approaches their car.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:29 PM
Dec 2014

like they practice/train the MAY BE GUN OMG KILL in 2 seconds

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
141. It aparently does not occur to them that they are the ones who turned their "Wartime tactics" on
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 01:46 PM
Dec 2014

us first. How much military equipment does NYC own? I in no way approve of the killing of the two policemen. It was an insane act and should not be repeated.

But the cop union wants to use this to say they do not have to change their methods. They fail to see the distrust all across America due to all the killings of unarmed persons including black men and women, the disabled, the homeless, shoppers in Walmart and anyone else that does not look like them. And most of the time these killings are regarding some small violation that most of us do not give a damn about in the first place.

Americans should not be killing our police in revenge. But likewise we Americans should not be afraid of our so called protectors. Regardless of these killings there needs to be changes in the way the police are enforcing our laws. The killings of almost helpless people needs to stop.

Hopemeister

(24 posts)
145. .
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:03 PM
Dec 2014
“The mayor’s hands are literally dripping with our blood because of his words, actions and policies,” read the statement, “and we have, for the first time in a number of years, become a ‘wartime’ police department. We will act accordingly.”


That is the statement of a man that should not be wearing a police uniform, but this is what it comes down to when you have a force that has so much power that they feel they're untouchable.

I hope ssomeone can hold them accountable if something should happen to the Mayor and his faamily.

mb999

(89 posts)
146. The police have been operating in war time mode for quite some time
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:10 PM
Dec 2014

That is part of the problem. Doubling down on the war effort is like trying to put out a fire with gasoline

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
149. Wow, I guess the NYPD wants to be disbanded. They like the idea of being a rogue agency.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:30 PM
Dec 2014

I keeed, that will never happen. But they are now declaring to be a rogue agency (at war with the citizens) taking orders from their union leaders.

IOW, now twice as dangerous AND three times as insane!

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
159. The PBA is denying the memo came from them . . .
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 03:46 AM
Dec 2014

. . . My bet is they're denying it now because they suddenly realize just how bad it makes them look!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»[NYPD] we have.....become...