Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:36 AM Dec 2014

Why Is This City’s Democratic Mayor Threatening To Veto A $10.10 Minimum Wage?

Why Is This City’s Democratic Mayor Threatening To Veto A $10.10 Minimum Wage?
12/18/14

The Democratic majority on Louisville, KY’s city council plans to vote for a $10.10 minimum wage on Thursday, but the city’s Democratic mayor has promised to veto the measure because he feels it is aggressive. Mayor Greg Fischer has said he would sign an increase from the current federal minimum of $7.25 an hour to $8.50 or $8.75, but the future of the measure is cloudy.

Fischer, who has described himself as “a business guy that just happens to be mayor,” had previously indicated that he might accept a $10 minimum wage if it were phased in very gradually.

But Fischer said on Monday that he worries that the council’s bill would cost the city jobs, a claim that is not supported by the most precise studies of how businesses and economies respond to minimum wage laws. Reports vary on whether or not council Democrats are willing to compromise with Fischer and lower their sights from $10.10.

A council committee advanced the $10.10 ordinance Monday on a party-line vote, and Democrats control 17 out of 26 seats on the full council. While it takes just 14 votes to pass a bill, reversing Fischer’s veto would require 18. The body’s top Republican told the Courier-Journal on Wednesday that none of his members will support any minimum wage hike, let alone the $10.10 proposal that has triggered intra-Democratic strife...

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/12/18/3605072/louisville-minimum-wage-standoff/



He thinks $10.10 is too high?
"If we started in 1960 and we said that as productivity goes up, that is as workers are producing more, then the minimum wage is going to go up the same. And if that were the case then the minimum wage today would be about $22 an hour."

"So my question is, with a minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, what happened to the other $14.75?

It sure didn't go to the worker."

~Elizabeth Warren
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
2. How quaint...
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:42 AM
Dec 2014

This person actually believes that being a Democrat still means something. Such a sweet kid.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. wtf, is the mayor doing? louisvill,KY start pay is well above 10.10 for all the city jobs
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

plus they have benefits. What is the Mayors pay and benefits?

http://agency.governmentjobs.com/louisvilleky/default.cfm

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
4. "a business guy who just happens to be mayor"
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:54 AM
Dec 2014

That is not a good match. I thought that a lot during the bush years. Putting someone who has a business mindset in a government role is not always a good choice. Unless, like Jimmy Carter they have actually done real work.
These types of people tend to look at the government in terms of money and not people. This attitude is rarely good for people, usually they are folks who put money before people. And look where that has gotten us.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
6. So true. And yet, rethugs & centrists still claim belief in "trickle down".
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:24 AM
Dec 2014

It trickles up. We know that now.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. Wise people always knew that, others were Reaganomics touting Conservative drones.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:09 AM
Dec 2014

The people who took 25 years to figure out Supply Side economics was destructive are the people who made millions advocating trickle down. Sadly few of them will admit to that venality.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
5. Knuckling under to the Chamber of Commerce goons and their threats of cutting shit jobs.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:10 AM
Dec 2014

A political party cannot effectively represent the interests of both workers and ownership. Somebody will get the priority and it seems to me it always plays out one way, the worker's needs are given the back burner or thrown into file 13.

Possibly some of the threats aren't even idle due to entire business models built on poverty wages and robbing productivity gains.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
7. I would have more respect for such positions if they were stated honestly.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:47 AM
Dec 2014

E.g., "This city's economy is under the thumb of a handful of monopolistic thugs who have threatened to punitively slash jobs if we raise the minimum wage this much. They wouldn't have to, of course - they're just being greedy and inhuman, and would punish you for daring to stand up for yourselves. I don't like knuckling under to hostage-takers, but it's the people of this city who would have to deal with the consequences one way or another. So I'll be thinking long and hard about this."

That at least would have the color of justification.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
8. Because almost anyone...
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:59 AM
Dec 2014

... can call themselves a "Democrat" while campaigning, then be just another POS Republican in reality once in office. It's called "Voting for the lessor of two evils."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Is This City’s Democr...