General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Is This City’s Democratic Mayor Threatening To Veto A $10.10 Minimum Wage?
12/18/14
The Democratic majority on Louisville, KYs city council plans to vote for a $10.10 minimum wage on Thursday, but the citys Democratic mayor has promised to veto the measure because he feels it is aggressive. Mayor Greg Fischer has said he would sign an increase from the current federal minimum of $7.25 an hour to $8.50 or $8.75, but the future of the measure is cloudy.
Fischer, who has described himself as a business guy that just happens to be mayor, had previously indicated that he might accept a $10 minimum wage if it were phased in very gradually.
But Fischer said on Monday that he worries that the councils bill would cost the city jobs, a claim that is not supported by the most precise studies of how businesses and economies respond to minimum wage laws. Reports vary on whether or not council Democrats are willing to compromise with Fischer and lower their sights from $10.10.
A council committee advanced the $10.10 ordinance Monday on a party-line vote, and Democrats control 17 out of 26 seats on the full council. While it takes just 14 votes to pass a bill, reversing Fischers veto would require 18. The bodys top Republican told the Courier-Journal on Wednesday that none of his members will support any minimum wage hike, let alone the $10.10 proposal that has triggered intra-Democratic strife...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/12/18/3605072/louisville-minimum-wage-standoff/
He thinks $10.10 is too high?
"So my question is, with a minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, what happened to the other $14.75?
It sure didn't go to the worker."
~Elizabeth Warren
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)This person actually believes that being a Democrat still means something. Such a sweet kid.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)plus they have benefits. What is the Mayors pay and benefits?
http://agency.governmentjobs.com/louisvilleky/default.cfm
logosoco
(3,208 posts)That is not a good match. I thought that a lot during the bush years. Putting someone who has a business mindset in a government role is not always a good choice. Unless, like Jimmy Carter they have actually done real work.
These types of people tend to look at the government in terms of money and not people. This attitude is rarely good for people, usually they are folks who put money before people. And look where that has gotten us.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)It trickles up. We know that now.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The people who took 25 years to figure out Supply Side economics was destructive are the people who made millions advocating trickle down. Sadly few of them will admit to that venality.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)A political party cannot effectively represent the interests of both workers and ownership. Somebody will get the priority and it seems to me it always plays out one way, the worker's needs are given the back burner or thrown into file 13.
Possibly some of the threats aren't even idle due to entire business models built on poverty wages and robbing productivity gains.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)E.g., "This city's economy is under the thumb of a handful of monopolistic thugs who have threatened to punitively slash jobs if we raise the minimum wage this much. They wouldn't have to, of course - they're just being greedy and inhuman, and would punish you for daring to stand up for yourselves. I don't like knuckling under to hostage-takers, but it's the people of this city who would have to deal with the consequences one way or another. So I'll be thinking long and hard about this."
That at least would have the color of justification.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... can call themselves a "Democrat" while campaigning, then be just another POS Republican in reality once in office. It's called "Voting for the lessor of two evils."
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)Headquarters Jeffersontown, Kentucky
Key people John Schnatter, Founder & CEO