General Discussion

malaise

(268,913 posts) Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:02 PM Oct 2015

So JebusEnoughFuggingBushes has changed his position

It's now we weren't attacked again.

Oops! I thought America was safe under Dumbya.

The buck stop with your brother - he was President and nothing will change that fact. And there were warnings.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So JebusEnoughFuggingBushes has changed his position (Original Post) malaise Oct 2015 OP

but what about Katrina! napkinz Oct 2015 #1

Let us eat cake malaise Oct 2015 #2

still, let's never forget what Bush did ON 9/11 (or failed to do ON 9/11) napkinz Oct 2015 #3

Jebb JebusEnoughFuggingBushes said Soviet Union instead of Russia malaise Oct 2015 #4

who is supposed to be the dumb Bush? napkinz Oct 2015 #6

I'd force him to compliment FDR. WinkyDink Oct 2015 #5

jebby doing all he can to turn shit into chocolate. moron. nt Javaman Oct 2015 #7

napkinz

(17,199 posts)

1. but what about Katrina!

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:06 PM

Oct 2015

malaise

(268,913 posts)

2. Let us eat cake

Reply to napkinz (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:07 PM

Oct 2015

napkinz

(17,199 posts)

3. still, let's never forget what Bush did ON 9/11 (or failed to do ON 9/11)

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:08 PM

Oct 2015

posted by lame54

see http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027269182

malaise

(268,913 posts)

4. Jebb JebusEnoughFuggingBushes said Soviet Union instead of Russia

Reply to napkinz (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:10 PM

Oct 2015

while attacking Frump

napkinz

(17,199 posts)

6. who is supposed to be the dumb Bush?

Reply to malaise (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:11 PM

Oct 2015

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)

5. I'd force him to compliment FDR.

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:10 PM

Oct 2015

Javaman

(62,517 posts)

7. jebby doing all he can to turn shit into chocolate. moron. nt

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Wed Oct 21, 2015, 09:08 AM

Oct 2015

Reply to this discussion