Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Future Of The Democratic Party Will Be Decided By The Supreme Court
Placing Blame Where It Is DueAs Yglesias notes, many of the Republican Partys structural advantages in state legislative and U.S. House races stem from gerrymandering GOP control of most state legislatures lets Republicans draw boundaries in a way that is even more GOP-friendly than the natural population distribution would suggest. He also names several policies pushed by Republican state lawmakers that further entrench GOP control. New curbs on voting rights, to further tilt the electorate in a richer, whiter, older direction help shift the electorate away from the Democratic Party and towards Republicans. Meanwhile, union-hostile right to work laws starve a backbone of the Democratic Partys infrastructure of the funding and members it needs to function.
If you dont like gerrymandering, you should blame the Supreme Court. In the 2004 case Vieth v. Jubelirer, four conservative justices said that they would forbid federal courts from hearing challenges to partisan gerrymanders, and Justice Anthony Kennedys concurring opinion was only slightly less dismissive of these lawsuits. The result is that state lawmakers have been free to draw maps that entrench their party and lock out the other party, even though such maps violate voters First Amendment rights.
The Supreme Court is also complicit in the wave of curbs on voting rights that Yglesias notes in his piece. In a party-line vote, a 5-4 Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, enabling many voter ID laws, gerrymandered maps and other legislation that would have otherwise been blocked to go into effect. Similarly, the Court in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board effectively greenlighted Voter ID laws one of the most common examples of state laws that exclude voters likely to support Democrats. The Courts plurality opinion cited concerns about in-person voter fraud to justify this outcome, even though the opinion could only find one example of such fraud occurring in the United States within the preceding 140 years!
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/19/3713681/if-democrats-ever-want-to-pass-a-law-again-they-need-to-control-the-supreme-court/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 571 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Future Of The Democratic Party Will Be Decided By The Supreme Court (Original Post)
UCmeNdc
Oct 2015
OP
moondust
(19,917 posts)1. RIP U.S. democracy.
Hey, at least they're not slaughtering the natives in their campaigns to possess and reign over the land and everything on it. That's sooooo 17th century.