Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(70,652 posts)
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 01:55 PM Oct 2015

"Why Angry Old Men Calling a Meeting to Yell at a Woman Is Always a Spectacular Failure"

*********QUOTE********

http://theslot.jezebel.com/why-angry-old-men-calling-a-meeting-to-yell-at-a-woman-1738194096
[font size=5]Why Angry Old Men Calling a Meeting to Yell at a Woman Is Always a Spectacular Failure[/font]

Twice in recent weeks, we’ve gotten to watch hotly anticipated Congressional hearings, in which mostly male Republican members got the chance to grill powerful women who had upset them. In both cases, those members of Congress ended up looking like damn fools. How’d that happen?

There are lots of good reasons why neither the #Benghazi squad yelling at Hillary Clinton nor the House Oversight Committee yelling at Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards worked out particularly well for Congress. Some of it stems from the fact that both hearings were show trials, a purely partisan effort to show the folks back home how erectly principled their conservative principles are. But there’s also a visual, theatrical reason: watching a body composed predominantly of white men shout at, interrupt, and harangue a dignified, composed woman has always been a bad look, and in 2015, it’s one the public will no longer accept. ....

The New York Times editorial board called the Republican members of Congress “spiteful” and their grilling “pointless.” The Washington Post called it “unfortunate,” saying it “elicited little new information” while giving Clinton the chance to mount a “stout” defense of her conduct following the attacks. Even Fox News had to call her “visibly measured.”

Basically, Clinton’s enemies gave her a chance to display a gravitas befitting the leader of the free world for eleven hours straight. She didn’t slip, she didn’t stutter, she didn’t lose her composure. Even people (like some on staff) who aren’t Clinton fans could see plain as day that she looked presidential as hell.

When Clinton got mad, she did it in just the right way, always a tricky thing for a woman in the public eye. ... ....

*************UNQUOTE


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Why Angry Old Men Calling a Meeting to Yell at a Woman Is Always a Spectacular Failure" (Original Post) UTUSN Oct 2015 OP
I agree. Not a big Hillary fan, but... TreasonousBastard Oct 2015 #1
Yeah, they figured the little woman would cry and scream back. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #2
Wouldn't their heads explode Blue_In_AK Oct 2015 #3
I think mercuryblues Oct 2015 #4
Bernie is my number one choice, but I am impressed with Hillary for the way smirkymonkey Oct 2015 #5
In other news... Scurrilous Oct 2015 #6

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. I agree. Not a big Hillary fan, but...
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:19 PM
Oct 2015

if she could handle that with aplomb, I imagine she could handle anything that comes her way in the Oval Office.

More and more I am looking forward to another President Clinton.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
2. Yeah, they figured the little woman would cry and scream back.
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 02:28 PM
Oct 2015

Well, maybe in their fundie world, but not so much in the arena of progressive feminists. ROFL at the cretins' blatant stupidity.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
5. Bernie is my number one choice, but I am impressed with Hillary for the way
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 05:03 PM
Oct 2015

she handled these hateful morons. God, this whole thing just pissed me off beyond belief.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Why Angry Old Men C...