General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCISA Security Bill Passes Senate With Privacy Flaws Unfixed
FOR MONTHS, PRIVACY advocates have asked Congress to kill or reform the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, a bill that they say hides new government surveillance mechanisms in the guise of security protections. Now the Senate has shot down a series of attempts to change the legislations most controversial measures, and then passed it with those privacy-invasive features fully intact.
On Tuesday afternoon, the Senate voted 74 to 21 to pass a version of CISA that roughly mirrors legislation passed in the House earlier this year, paving the way for some combined version of the security bill to become law. CISA is designed to stem the rising tide of corporate data breaches by allowing companies to share cybersecurity threat data with the Department of Homeland Security, who could then pass it on to other agencies like the FBI and NSA, who would in theory use it to defend the target company and others facing similar attacks. That landslide vote was no doubt fueled in part by a year of massive hacks that hit targets including the health insurer Anthem, Sony, and the Office of Personal Management.
But privacy advocates and civil liberties groups see CISA as a free pass that allows companies to monitor users and share their information with the government without a warrant, while offering a backdoor that circumvents any laws that might protect users privacy. The incentive and the framework it creates is for companies to quickly and massively collect user information and ship it to the government, says Mark Jaycox, a legislative analyst for the civil liberties group the Electronic Frontier Foundation. As soon as you do, you obtain broad immunity, even if youve violated privacy law.
The version of CISA passed Tuesday, in fact, spells out that any broadly defined cybersecurity threat information gathered can be shared notwithstanding any other provision of law. Privacy advocates consider that a vague and potentially reckless exemption in the protections of Americans personal information. Every law is struck down for the purposes of this information sharing: financial privacy, electronic communications privacy, health privacy, none of it would matter, says Robyn Greene, policy counsel for the Open Technology Institute. Thats a dangerous road to go down.
http://www.wired.com/2015/10/cisa-cybersecurity-information-sharing-act-passes-senate-vote-with-privacy-flaws/
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Ask not why your country can listen to you, but remember why you must never ask your country inconvenient questions.
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)CISA has faced opposition from the security community, which has largely objected to claims that information-sharing effectively stops cyberattacks. Tech firms also oppose the bills, arguing it will diminish their users trust in sharing private information with companies. Apple, Reddit, Twitter, the Business Software Alliance, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, and other tech firms have all publicly opposed the bill. And a coalition of 55 civil liberties groups and security experts all signed onto an open letter opposing the bill in April. Even the Department of Homeland Security itself has warned in a July letter that the bill could flood the agency with information of dubious value at the same time as it sweep[s] away privacy protections.
msongs
(67,360 posts)corporations want this.and the dem establishment is all about "Bi-partisanism"
If your not part of top 1% obama could care less.