General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy does firewood cost so much? Fracking's part of it
FILE - In this Friday Nov. 15, 2013, file photo, Eric Clark keeps an eye on fresh split cord wood at Treehugger Farms in Westmoreland, N.H. Prices in parts of New England are averaging $325 a cord and can even push past $400 for a seasoned, delivered load. Thats anywhere from $50 to $75 more a cord than last year or an increase of 18 to 23 percent.(AP Photo/Jim Cole, File)
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/d87a68e928f844f4a894938a70c6409b/why-does-firewood-cost-so-much-frackings-part-it
By RIK STEVENS
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) Northeasterners who are digging deeper into their pockets to pay for firewood this season can add a new scapegoat to the roster of usual market forces: fracking.
Yep, a timber industry representative in New Hampshire said those hydraulic fracturing well sites in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale formation to suck natural gas out of the ground are using construction "mats" made of hardwood logs think of the corduroy roads seen in sepia-toned photographs from the 1800s to get heavy equipment over mucky ground, wetlands or soft soils.
That increased demand has crept down the chimney into fireplaces. Prices in parts of New England are averaging $325 a cord and can even push past $400 for a seasoned, delivered load. That's anywhere from $50 to $75 more a cord than last year or an increase of 18 to 23 percent.
Jasen Stock, executive director of the New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association, said it's not just fracking sites that are hogging the logs. Pipelines and transmission wires really any large-scale construction project have in the past three years ramped up the appetite for the perfect mat log: a hardwood trunk, 16 to 20 feet long and 8 to 10 inches in diameter.
FULL story at link.
Clever stacking of firewood on the front porch of Terri and Bob Tomchak's cozy home in Bridgton, Maine, allows them to enjoy the view from their living room window, Friday, Oct. 23, 2015. The couple burns about four cords of firewood each winter. Some consumers who may have switched over to wood over the past several years as heating oil prices ratcheted up are feeling a little buyer's remorse but continue to keep the woodpiles stocked even as prices push over $400 a cord. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I would guess that demand for firewood is way up this year, probably due to high electricity prices and last year's very bad winter. Supply just doesn't increase as fast.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I think you generally look to purchase wood that is "seasoned" for a year.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)The sap in seasoned wood has dried up. Unseasoned, or green wood, won't burn well (if at all) because it is too wet. If the wood is extremely heavy and has sap oozing out of it, it's too early to burn. Wood takes from six months to a year to season; most wood being sold now was cut last spring.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Salviati
(6,008 posts)I've got a cousin who works in the firewood business, and a lot of the truckers he used to work with got better offers hauling sand for fracking.
Though that has dried up a bit with the plunging oil prices, I imagine the trucks can switch over pretty quick, but using the lumber for construction may have used up a good chunk of the supply of seasoned wood, and that will take longer to rebuild.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)saying free oak, and no one takes it, the garbage takes it. Ugh. what a waste, and some of the branches that fall are over 1 foot wide, I just don't split it for them.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)That does not seem like enough oak to be worth the effort.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)that amount of wood. Don't jump to conclusions, what did you expect? I had to contain it, the garbage people wouldn't even pick it up if it were just laying on my lawn killing the grass and a box could go in the street, but not loose wood.
and I had a sign on it. and large limbs sticking out. a person could have picked it up without getting dirty or dirtying their car or truck,
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Burning firewood is a tremendous source of air pollution.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)EX500rider
(10,809 posts)With the cold weather closing in, it was time to think about green ways to heat our home. We chose a Stovax multi-fuel stove, which we were lucky enough to get from friends.
[ ]
In a city where every other house seems to be having its kitchen or bathroom ripped out, there is vast amounts of burnable scrap wood lying around waiting to go to the dump, which could instead be heating your house. Paying for wood to burn seems positively stupid when you can pick up a weeks supply from neighbours, most of whom are all too willing to let you have it. I cant see the logic in buying wood thats been transported hundreds of miles either, so Ive become something of an eagle-eyed wood-spotting obsessive. We look for wood thats unvarnished, unpainted and untreated, and either carry it home, or rope in friends with cars or vans to pick it up for us. Ive also got a few friendly builders who drop off scrap wood to us (thus saving them dumping fees), and a supply of off-cuts from a furniture repair workshop. To build up next years wood store, which we made from scrap wooden pallets covered with tarpaulin, were planning to buy some logs from a local tree surgeon and season them for a year, by which time the excitement of dragging wood out of skips and yards may well have worn off.
[ ]
As I basked rather smugly in the warm glow of our pretty, near zero-carbon heating system, for a good few weeks I was unaware that things were about to get tricky. Then with one click on the mouse, I stumbled across a website which catapulted me into my biggest eco-refurbishment crisis yet. It seems, according to some of the eminent researchers at the Association of Environmentally Conscious Builders [AECB] that burning wood is not carbon neutral after all. I was gutted, to say the least. I emailed the AECB in a panic, who put me onto the authors of Biomass: A Burning Issue, Nick Grant and Alan Clarke. Their paper concludes that while its true that trees do absorb carbon dioxide when they grow, it doesnt mean that the best use for the wood biomass is burning it. Burning, say Grant and Clarke, produces more carbon emissions than burning gas. Disaster.
Instead, they argue that timber should be left unburnt, thus imprisoning the carbon, and put to other uses; for example, as structural timber, insulation material or furniture. As owners of low-energy houses fuelled by wood burning stoves, they are both gutted too. We dont want people to hate us, Nick told me. Please dont shoot the messenger. The unfortunate result of assuming that wood-burning is carbon neutral is that it has been promoted by just about everyone, which has meant, as they point out, that wood is now being burnt faster than its grown, leading to rising prices and unsustainable burning practices to start
http://www.sustainablecitiesnet.com/research/burning-wood-not-so-carbon-neutral/
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)And US trees are not being cut for fuel faster than they can regrow. Net annual growth on commercial forests exceeds harvests by 47% each year.
Any other resource intercepted before it gets to a landfill is considered a net win.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)has a catalytic converter on it and it. Urns hot enough so there are few particulates.
We also don't buy firewood since we have plenty of downed timber already.
procon
(15,805 posts)you can get a firewood permit for $15 a cord. It's deadfall, fallen trees that have died due to the beetle infestation which is getting worse because global warming makes the winters so mild the bugs don't die off. Anyway, you have to cut it, load it and haul the wood out, but for those with the means it's cheap for your own use, or profitable if you need a little side money. Last year I paid $325 for 1 1/2 cords of mixed wood, cut and split for the stove, delivered and stacked. It will see me thru 2 seasons and it's much cheaper than the cost of propane for running the furnace.
moosemike
(14 posts)All fracking is is the 19th century rearing its ugly head again. Unfettered capitalism exploiting the environment in the name of greed.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)were burning shelled corn. Of course that was when corn was selling for $1.30.
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)delivered and stacked. He charged $175 for a full cord.