Paul Krugman: On Invincible Ignorance
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/21/opinion/on-invincible-ignorance.html?_r=1
Like just about everyone in the Republican establishment, Mr. Ryan is in denial about the roots of Trumpism, about the extent to which the party deliberately cultivated anger and racial backlash, only to lose control of the monster it created. But what I found especially striking were his comments on tax policy. I know, boring but indulge me here. Theres a larger moral.
You might think that Republican thought leaders would be engaged in some soul-searching about their partys obsession with cutting taxes on the wealthy. Why do candidates who inveigh against the evils of budget deficits and federal debt feel obliged to propose huge high-end tax cuts much bigger than those of George W. Bush that would eliminate trillions in revenue?
And economics aside, why such a commitment to a policy that has never had much support even from the partys own base, and appears even more politically suspect in the face of a populist uprising?
<snip>
Appalled Republicans may rail against Donald Trumps arrogant ignorance. But how different, really, are the partys mainstream leaders? Their blinkered view of the world has the veneer of respectability, may go along with an appearance of thoughtfulness, but in reality its just as impervious to evidence maybe even more so, because it has the power of groupthink behind it.
This is why you shouldnt grieve over Marco Rubios epic political failure. Had Mr. Rubio succeeded, he would simply have encouraged his party to believe that all it needs is a cosmetic makeover a fresher, younger face to sell the same old defunct orthodoxy. Oh, and a last-minute turn to someone like John Kasich would, in its own way, have similar implications.