General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBet the Brussels attack gets way more coverage
than Obama's address in Havana
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...at this time I am far more concerned about Brussels.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Where is Bill Clinton (who wants to take away Medicare) at today..we need to keep an eye on him.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)It is a bigger story. This attack does pretty much takes the spotlight off Obama's trip.
The entire international media will now be focused on Brussels.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)But we have an election going on to pick our nominee for President. It is the new President that will deal with this type of terrorism. So it is vitally important that it not get shoved by the way side so that things that are underhanded can occur.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)I'm okay with the coverage.
Mary Mac
(323 posts)Praying for Belgium.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)9/11.
Bonx
(2,051 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Not so much in the long term. But that's how the news media works: big, flashy, and (preferably) bloody rules the roost.
Obama's Cuba visit is momentous...but the media was already more focused on the latest blithering outbursts from the vulgar talking yam.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Europe is worried about safety first. As they should be.
This has caused defensive moves in several other countries, the EU headquarters in Brussels is locked down, and at least 34 people are dead with over 100 injured.
If this type of attack occurred on US soil it would be THE news item, and that is justified.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Why not?