There is a negative machine that looks for every little thing that can shed doubt about Hillary's record. Some even fabricated but made so obscure and often that you have to dig to find the truth.

Take the accusation that the Clinton foundation was laundering money allegedly made by a media "giant" called Charles Krauthammer. The real fact was that the actual statement was unsubstantiated by a blogger post who called himself by that name. People ate it up. http://www.snopes.com/krauthammer-clinton-foundation-laundering/

On transparency... I tend to trust NPR a little more:

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/04/27/402625347/fact-check-is-the-clinton-foundation-the-most-transparent

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

Nevertheless, the various fact-checking operations have to keep slapping down the claims that it's merely a front for Bill and Hillary's slush fund (which, sadly I've heard from far-left groups, as well as right-wingers). The latest false claim making the rounds is a Trump superpac ad saying the Clintons took over $100 million out of the organization. Politifact debunked that one:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/07/america-rising-now/pro-trump-super-pac-ad-wrong-clinton-wealth/

. . . . these question would not keep coming up.

But there's no drama in showing the Clintons to be honest. So they don't cover it.

And Trump's/VRWC bullshit about it becomes the accepted narrative.

The republican party does not deal in facts. They deal in feelings..

Newt says so himself at around 14:10

?t=14m10s

That explains the bullshit 'Clinton Cash' book/'documentary' and the endless Benghazi hearings.

Tear down the charity work and tear down her experience as SOS.