Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:04 PM Aug 2016

Obama has now delivered a third body blow to the war on drugs

Lest people forget.

1. The Obama administration has essentially gutted the basis of civil forfeitures, which made the war on drugs profitable to enforcement agencies.

2. The Obama administration has opened cannabis research to institutions other than the University of Mississippi

3. Today, the Obama administration has announced that the Federal government will move its incarceration away from private prisons.

This is how you end the war on drugs. One step at a time. Thanks Obama.

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama has now delivered a third body blow to the war on drugs (Original Post) Recursion Aug 2016 OP
Though rescheduling marijuana wouldn't be such a bad step, either. villager Aug 2016 #1
We need a DEM legislature for that--the pushback if he MADem Aug 2016 #6
Well, the Speaker of the House for MA is Robert DeLeo (D). What's his take on legalization? Eleanors38 Aug 2016 #25
MJ is de-facto legalized in MA. MADem Aug 2016 #52
The problem as I see it is that MJ remains illegal, and as such that illegality remains as a tool Eleanors38 Aug 2016 #73
The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. MADem Aug 2016 #74
No, we don't. ABLEZEROSIX Aug 2016 #47
Congress giveth, and Congress taketh away. nt MADem Aug 2016 #53
I have read that Hillary plans to do that if she gets elected. calimary Aug 2016 #29
Lots of plans on campaign trails from Democratic candidates. villager Aug 2016 #30
I think it'd be a GREAT move. I hope she does it. calimary Aug 2016 #31
Again, lots of "great moves" espoused on campaign trails. Let's see what the actual policy villager Aug 2016 #33
We pressure, they listen... gilpo Aug 2016 #38
You'd think. Though that didn't keep us out of Iraq, or give us a public option villager Aug 2016 #41
Actually a change from Sched I to II is really cosmetic, wouldn't change much. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #42
The change would still be a "ratcheting down," though thanks for posting that link villager Aug 2016 #43
Yeah, it's a step in the right direction, and I'm glad our party is at least starting to show Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #46
Tell it to the millions of people negatively effected by the war on America (Drugs) Taitertots Aug 2016 #2
Ok, really? JNelson6563 Aug 2016 #4
You don't get everything you want today Democat Aug 2016 #13
So none of this is progress?! tia uponit7771 Aug 2016 #18
+1 melman Aug 2016 #55
He is doing everything he can without Congressional action. Agnosticsherbet Aug 2016 #3
Millions of people are still deprived of their right to vote for being liberals. Coyotl Aug 2016 #5
Voting rights are a STATE issue. STATES control elections--even federal ones. MADem Aug 2016 #8
Yes. And. Millions of people are still deprived of their right to vote. Coyotl Aug 2016 #27
Yes. And. This is a job for governors. MADem Aug 2016 #37
He should reschedule cannabis vlyons Aug 2016 #7
And have a rightwing Congress, in their last desperate act before they MADem Aug 2016 #12
wouldn't Obama have to sign it though? Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #22
If enough of those bums have investments in Big Pharma MADem Aug 2016 #40
true that... Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #61
Maybe.....just maybe....that is being planned for...let's say...after, yes after the election Stuart G Aug 2016 #16
Yes, people of color should be grateful, their prisons cells will be upgraded. jtuck004 Aug 2016 #9
Not to mention our system of plea bargains Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2016 #58
I hope on his final days in office Ligyron Aug 2016 #10
The last round of pardons I saw on the interwebs was all people with crack convictions AllyCat Aug 2016 #51
He can only pardon people in federal prisons TexasBushwhacker Aug 2016 #69
Rescheduling Cannabis would be nice Calculating Aug 2016 #11
bravo allan01 Aug 2016 #14
Thank you, President Obama, however many steps you take! Another lesson to your detractors. ancianita Aug 2016 #15
As an ex long - term Federal drug war inmate, I applaud Obama's moves. NBachers Aug 2016 #17
Very good point PatSeg Aug 2016 #19
Hear hear. byronius Aug 2016 #20
Absolutely! Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2016 #59
it's a good start, but aren't their much bolder steps he can take? Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #21
4. pardoning prisoners from prison for non-violent drug offences Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #23
how about non-prisoners melman Aug 2016 #56
yeah, that's messed up, and it's also fucked that Obama has just pardoned a precious handful Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #60
My President lillypaddle Aug 2016 #24
#2 will make it easier to reschedule Cannabis alfredo Aug 2016 #26
The reason that indian wars lasted 100 years in New Spain Xipe Totec Aug 2016 #28
I like your analogy to a degree ... Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2016 #66
Thanks for posting this. Ellen Forradalom Aug 2016 #32
As to your first point, "no". truebluegreen Aug 2016 #34
Yeah, that sucks big time. progressoid Aug 2016 #48
I agree. I thought we had turned a corner there. nt truebluegreen Aug 2016 #50
Making room for the disgruntled trump supporters OxQQme Aug 2016 #35
Sorry, I don't think #2 is true Peachhead22 Aug 2016 #36
Except #1 is also not true: see link in post #34 above. truebluegreen Aug 2016 #45
A simple solution SheriffBob Aug 2016 #39
How would that help? Recursion Aug 2016 #44
i thought the dea director made the decisions in this matter. SheriffBob Aug 2016 #71
Sure, some. But rescheduling wouldn't actually change anything Recursion Aug 2016 #75
If the war on drugs (really cannabis) The Wizard Aug 2016 #49
Obama: Always planning 6 moves ahead. Now for gods' sake let's send a Dem Congress... Hekate Aug 2016 #54
Amen underthematrix Aug 2016 #76
Phony Drug War WestIndianArchie Aug 2016 #57
meh, pretty weak. Vattel Aug 2016 #62
Next they need to stop raids on legal grow operations IronLionZion Aug 2016 #63
K & R Scurrilous Aug 2016 #64
It's a shame he waited until he was a lame duck to do this. Ikonoklast Aug 2016 #65
He didn't. These things took six years to do Recursion Aug 2016 #67
No way was Obama going to do this with an election on the line. Ikonoklast Aug 2016 #68
Who is he afraid of losing anyway? Calculating Aug 2016 #72
I lulz'd. KG Aug 2016 #70
The War On Drugs should have ended 20 years ago. Initech Aug 2016 #77
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. Though rescheduling marijuana wouldn't be such a bad step, either.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:05 PM
Aug 2016

Nonetheless, better to have the small steps than none at all.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. We need a DEM legislature for that--the pushback if he
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:35 PM
Aug 2016

tried it could result in problematic law that it would take forever to pick apart.

He is inching forward. It's irritating to those who prefer grand change, but incremental change usually works better.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
25. Well, the Speaker of the House for MA is Robert DeLeo (D). What's his take on legalization?
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 02:56 PM
Aug 2016

How about Attorney General Maura Healey (D)? Boston Mayor Marty Walsh? They seem to agree with the Governor and Lt Governor.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
52. MJ is de-facto legalized in MA.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 12:50 AM
Aug 2016

You can get a prescription easily and the police aren't busting people.

It's a hundred dollar fine (ticket) IF you give the popo so much grief that they're searching you.

Marty Walsh is an addict--he'd ban alcohol if he could get away with it.

Even Elizabeth Warren has pivoted from being anti to being open to exploring.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
73. The problem as I see it is that MJ remains illegal, and as such that illegality remains as a tool
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:04 PM
Aug 2016

against people, a proxy excuse to use for repression, "round-ups," and rhetorical diversions. Sure, you can get away with smoking in places like Austin -- if you are not on someone's "unsub" list. It also keeps the Democratic Party out of the pilot house because of its overwrought fear of being "Soft on -----" (fill in the blank), and hence deferring to the GOP. I am particularly concerned about the A.G.'s well-developed ideology of prohibitionist politics: Make something illegal so we can make you illegal.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
74. The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:18 PM
Aug 2016

We are well down the road; we have longer to go.

I seem to recall that mj possession, even for small amounts, in TX used to carry up to a life sentence...and now people are smoking in Austin?

http://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/how-the-new-drug-law-was-made/


http://norml.org/laws/item/texas-penalties-2

We'll have a new AG in a few months--and a new approach to this issue. If Obama does anything more with this matter, it'll be as a lame duck AFTER the election.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
29. I have read that Hillary plans to do that if she gets elected.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 03:27 PM
Aug 2016

From Schedule 1 to Schedule 2, so we can start studying it for its medicinal value.

That's a good step, as well! Marijuana should have been reclassified a LOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNG time ago!

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
30. Lots of plans on campaign trails from Democratic candidates.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 03:29 PM
Aug 2016

Would love to have this actually happen, however.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
33. Again, lots of "great moves" espoused on campaign trails. Let's see what the actual policy
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 03:52 PM
Aug 2016

...turns out to be.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
41. You'd think. Though that didn't keep us out of Iraq, or give us a public option
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:31 PM
Aug 2016

...or even protect much of our 4th Amendment.

But we still have to pressure, regardless.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
42. Actually a change from Sched I to II is really cosmetic, wouldn't change much.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:45 PM
Aug 2016

Except crack the door open more for pharma companies; it would do nothing to resolve the inherent conflict btw. federal and state law.

The 9th District acknowledged in its recent ruling- the current situation is untenable. Federal law needs to be fixed, whether that involves full descheduling of marijuana from the CSA, allowing states to opt out of federal law pertaining to marijuana, or what.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-marijuana-federal-law-20160818-snap-story.html

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
43. The change would still be a "ratcheting down," though thanks for posting that link
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:49 PM
Aug 2016

Obviously, full descheduling will have to happen sometime, and/or the state "opt out." (Though that will leave red states nabbing highway travelers from "legal states" as a kind of "cash cow" for their "no-tax" coffers...)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
46. Yeah, it's a step in the right direction, and I'm glad our party is at least starting to show
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 08:24 PM
Aug 2016

some awareness on the issue nationally, instead of treating it like a big joke.

Really, I think the big game-changer on the immediate horizon is Measure 64 in CA. If CA legalizes that will mean both the entire West Coast and the 6th biggest economy in the world or what-have-you are legal; if that passes then I think the writing will really be on the wall for prohibition.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
2. Tell it to the millions of people negatively effected by the war on America (Drugs)
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:09 PM
Aug 2016

Tell them you championed the half measures that only served to prolong prohibition.

Tell them maybe your grand children won't be the target of a war against the American people.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
4. Ok, really?
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:21 PM
Aug 2016

No one "championed half-measures". I see some little progress has been made and the OP was pointing that out. No need for hostility, we're all on the same side here.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
13. You don't get everything you want today
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:57 PM
Aug 2016

That's not the way that a government split between the far right and the left works.

Be happy that progress is being made and keep fighting.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
5. Millions of people are still deprived of their right to vote for being liberals.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:26 PM
Aug 2016

You want to end the war on Mr. Nixon's political enemies, restore their right to participate in democracy.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. Voting rights are a STATE issue. STATES control elections--even federal ones.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:44 PM
Aug 2016

He is not a king, and he cannot order a state to conduct their elections in any specific way.


This is why some ex-felons can vote in some states, and can't in others.

Terry McAuliffe took so much shit as governor when he restored the rights of felons (he had to sign each document--many thousands of them--individually) because the STATES have ownership of the process.

The way to win the voting rights battle is to do it at the state level. There's no way that a GOP Congress is going to create any law that encourages people who will not vote for them to have the right of enfranchisement--and that's how any sweeping federal change would have to be made, absent a civil rights - type issue that is decided at the Supreme Court.

If you live in a state that denies these rights, I would urge you to find the group working to change them, and offer time, cash, and other support to them.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
27. Yes. And. Millions of people are still deprived of their right to vote.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 03:15 PM
Aug 2016

And that is why in racist states they use these Jim Crow laws to take the vote away from people. Redneck cops and DA's continue doing the political dirty work every day. This needs to stoop, and there are ways for the federal government to act in the interest of the disenfranchised.

I'm pointing to a big issue, while not saying what you read into my post.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. Yes. And. This is a job for governors.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:11 PM
Aug 2016

Look at what McAuliffe did in VA. He threw a bright light on the issue, and good for him.

We need to elect more governors who will do what he did. We are not even close to any tipping point on this issue, yet. We're getting there, but it is going to take time AND activism at the state level, not looking to King Barack for a solution--he just doesn't have the Congress to help him, or the time.

If you think that the POTUS can wave his hand and decree that states run elections the way he wants, and allow the voters of his choosing, I have a bridge for sale. The SC would shove that back in his face so fast we'd be reeling from the effects of it for generations.

The laws and election rules vary widely from state to state--it's a state prerogative, not a federal one:

http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx

Obama IS working to fix this issue, but he's going around and slipping in via the side door, not marching up to the front door and trying to bang it down. All that kind of approach does is encourage the far right to further bar the door.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. And have a rightwing Congress, in their last desperate act before they
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:47 PM
Aug 2016

lose the majority in at least one chamber, stick it to us with a "EFF YEW" Exception law that might take a while to unpick?

This guy understands that the best route isn't always the quickest one.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
40. If enough of those bums have investments in Big Pharma
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:14 PM
Aug 2016

they can override his veto.

"First I Look At The Purse."

--Most US Congressmen

Stuart G

(38,420 posts)
16. Maybe.....just maybe....that is being planned for...let's say...after, yes after the election
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 02:04 PM
Aug 2016

so.............. late November...after Hillary has been safely elected in a landslide...just maybe...........

that will be time to .........reschedule cannabis........

we do not need this election argued about something other than ....asshole Drump...

something that might unify the anti pot crusaders...well.......we know who they are...don't we?

Oh......proper timing is essential in a move like that..don't you think?????

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
9. Yes, people of color should be grateful, their prisons cells will be upgraded.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Aug 2016

The people with money are doing all they can, you see.

Michelle Alexander: White Men Get Rich from Legal Pot, Black Men Stay in Prison
For 40 years, poor communities of color have experienced the wrath of the war on drugs.

But the ramifications of this momentous shift are left unaddressed. When you flick on the TV to a segment about the flowering pot market in Colorado, you'll find that the faces of the movement are primarily white and male. Meanwhile, many of the more than 210,000 people who were arrested for marijuana possession in Colorado between 1986 and 2010 according to a report from the Marijuana Arrest Research Project, remain behind bars. Thousands of black men and boys still sit in prisons for possession of the very plant that's making those white guys on TV rich.

“In many ways the imagery doesn't sit right,” said Michelle Alexander, associate professor of law at Ohio State University and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness in a public conversation on March 6 with Asha Bandele of the Drug Policy Alliance. “Here are white men poised to run big marijuana businesses, dreaming of cashing in big—big money, big businesses selling weed—after 40 years of impoverished black kids getting prison time for selling weed, and their families and futures destroyed. Now, white men are planning to get rich doing precisely the same thing?”
...

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/michelle-alexander-white-men-get-rich-legal-pot-black-men-stay-prison



...
A few days later, the corner is empty. The reason is a Ford SUV, painted black, blue, and white, idling at the curb a few feet away; a police officer’s arm hangs out the window as he surveys the faces passing by. A few hours later he is gone, and the crowd is back. Mostly, the crowd is black. Mostly, the cops who will bust them are white. Mostly, on the corner it’s hard to see how anything was changed by a movement that aimed to change everything.

The dream of legal marijuana as it is being sold to the American public is that it will not only give states a chance to reap a tax windfall off of a drug millions of Americans already use; it will end the back-and-forth tussle among cops, users, and dealers, and shift police resources to more serious crimes. Most compellingly, advocates hold out the promise of a major step toward dismantling one of the pillars of racially biased policing—the war on drugs—and finally reeling in a legal net that has long entangled black men at vastly disproportionate rates.

Proponents of legalization make this case explicitly. In factsheets and reports, the American Civil Liberties Union describes marijuana laws as generating “staggering” racial bias. And the statistics do paint a stark picture: Although whites are as likely to use marijuana as blacks, nationally black people are almost four times more likely to be arrested for possessing the drug. In some states, it’s closer to nine times. Those arrests in turn show up on background checks for everything from apartments to jobs, and despite the courts’ presumption of innocence, arrests are often treated by society as de facto markers of guilt. So in one fell swoop, voters are told, they can balance government budgets, begin to close a pipeline that sends one in three black men to prison, and free up the cops to chase real criminals. Plus, now it’s legal to get stoned.
...

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/michelle-alexander-white-men-get-rich-legal-pot-black-men-stay-prison

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
58. Not to mention our system of plea bargains
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 07:01 AM
Aug 2016

...which is no justice at all. It's just legalized hostage-taking and slavery. The whole system is geared to favour the rich and powerful.

If you're poor, you submit to servitude. If you're rich, you go free.

Ligyron

(7,629 posts)
10. I hope on his final days in office
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Aug 2016

that he pardons every last non-violent person that's in jail for drug possession nation wide.

AllyCat

(16,180 posts)
51. The last round of pardons I saw on the interwebs was all people with crack convictions
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 11:46 PM
Aug 2016

Not marijuana.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,175 posts)
69. He can only pardon people in federal prisons
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 10:10 AM
Aug 2016

Simple possession, even selling MJ won't land you in federal prison. Trafficking in from Mexico and across state lines will.

Calculating

(2,955 posts)
11. Rescheduling Cannabis would be nice
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:47 PM
Aug 2016

That and pardoning anybody in prison purely for possession of cannabis.

allan01

(1,950 posts)
14. bravo
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:57 PM
Aug 2016

the war on drugs according to its proponent was a war on hippies . blacks and other groups . nothing more than a sham

ancianita

(36,030 posts)
15. Thank you, President Obama, however many steps you take! Another lesson to your detractors.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:58 PM
Aug 2016

I'm so happy to feel the horrid years across at least three presidencies coming to an end.

I hope that next up across fifty states ther will be new prosecution regulations toward police who kill citizens they treat as 'guilty by suspicion.'

NBachers

(17,107 posts)
17. As an ex long - term Federal drug war inmate, I applaud Obama's moves.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 02:17 PM
Aug 2016

Last edited Fri Aug 19, 2016, 10:37 AM - Edit history (1)

I would also like to see the conspiracy and prosecution techniques that were developed for drug "offenders" to be used against financial crime terrorists in this country. The procedures are all worked out, and have proven effective. Why not use the structures that are already there?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
21. it's a good start, but aren't their much bolder steps he can take?
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 02:36 PM
Aug 2016

I will note that he has also pardoned prisoners from a lot of non-violent drug crimes.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
56. how about non-prisoners
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 02:33 AM
Aug 2016

My state has decriminalized weed but I still have a possession conviction that will be with me forever.

And it was for a tiny amount. It's fucked up.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
60. yeah, that's messed up, and it's also fucked that Obama has just pardoned a precious handful
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 07:48 AM
Aug 2016

of the hundreds of thousands of non-violent drug offenders.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
28. The reason that indian wars lasted 100 years in New Spain
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 03:19 PM
Aug 2016

Is that it was profitable for both sides to continue the practice.

Indians acquired property by raiding caravans, and Spaniards acquired slaves capturing the raiders. There was no incentive to kill the raiders because dead slaves aren't productive.

So the wars went on for a century until the viceroy realized what was happening and outlawed the practice of capturing slaves. Once the incentive of capturing slaves was removed, Spaniards began defending the caravans with deadly force, and the raids stopped because the risk became too high.

Likewise, the war on drugs has prolonged because there's profit to be made on both sides.

Remove the profit motive and suddenly the problem disappears.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
66. I like your analogy to a degree ...
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 08:44 AM
Aug 2016

But you seem to be implying that both sides control the laws being made.

One side is trying to survive. The other side is using the state to ethnically cleanse and/or enslave the other.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
34. As to your first point, "no".
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 04:00 PM
Aug 2016
Attorney General Loretta Lynch quietly reinstituted the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program recently, which incentivizes local authorities to more harshly prosecute cases in order to take advantage of asset forfeiture laws, allowing these local departments to confiscate personal property they believe is related to criminal activity – including cars, boats and cash – without trial or any due process beyond even suspicion, and share those seizures with federal authorities.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-04-11/obamas-doj-sets-back-justice-with-asset-forfeiture-program

Thanks, Obama


Peachhead22

(1,078 posts)
36. Sorry, I don't think #2 is true
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 04:52 PM
Aug 2016

Up until recently the University of Mississippi was the only place that could GROW the cannabis that was used by researchers. The researchers could be almost anywhere, then and now. And same as before, researchers still have to jump though many hoops to get permission to do the research. But at least they don't have to wait anymore for the U of Miss for the testing materials.

At least that's my understanding of it.

IMO #1 and #3 (and the Obama administration's policy of pretty much not getting in the way of individual states as the states reform their MJ laws) are overwhelmingly positive. But the recent DEA scheduling decision kinda sucked because it was misleading and didn't go nearly far enough.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
45. Except #1 is also not true: see link in post #34 above.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 07:27 PM
Aug 2016

Article goes on to say that the reinstatement of the program by the feds does, in fact, get in the way of reform efforts by the states.

SheriffBob

(552 posts)
39. A simple solution
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:14 PM
Aug 2016

Replace the leader of the DEA.

A lot of young voters, who would be voting for democrats, are voting for johnson and stein because they are pro legal pot.

Yet it seems like President Obama wants us to keep off the grass.



Recursion

(56,582 posts)
44. How would that help?
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 05:54 PM
Aug 2016

What would a new DEA director be able to accomplish that the current one can't?

SheriffBob

(552 posts)
71. i thought the dea director made the decisions in this matter.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 02:37 PM
Aug 2016

i could be wrong, though.

he does have influence.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
75. Sure, some. But rescheduling wouldn't actually change anything
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:19 PM
Aug 2016

That's probably why they went with the research expansion, since rescheduling Marijuana wouldn't decriminalize it

The Wizard

(12,542 posts)
49. If the war on drugs (really cannabis)
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 10:34 PM
Aug 2016

was successful 2/3 of our fast food industry would be closing down.
The DEA is a dumping ground where politicians get unwarranted good paying jobs for hacks and cronies who would otherwise be stealing hubcaps or selling hand relief in public toilets.

Hekate

(90,648 posts)
54. Obama: Always planning 6 moves ahead. Now for gods' sake let's send a Dem Congress...
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 01:29 AM
Aug 2016

....to Washington to work with Hillary so she can finish the job and then some.

WestIndianArchie

(386 posts)
57. Phony Drug War
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:51 AM
Aug 2016

How about a Presidential Pardon for all non-violent drug offenders in the country, before he leaves office.

IronLionZion

(45,432 posts)
63. Next they need to stop raids on legal grow operations
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 07:54 AM
Aug 2016

In the states that have legalized it, the DEA still harasses many legal cannabis growers which makes it prohibitively expensive for small independent businesses.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
65. It's a shame he waited until he was a lame duck to do this.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 08:40 AM
Aug 2016

Better late than never, I suppose.

It's a shame about those whose lives have been ruined in the useless "War On Drugs" insanity of the last forty years, let alone those since he was first inaugurated.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
67. He didn't. These things took six years to do
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 08:54 AM
Aug 2016

It would be amusing to watch people complain about that if it weren't sad.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
68. No way was Obama going to do this with an election on the line.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 09:09 AM
Aug 2016

The Republicans would have used that as campaign fodder, and we all know that.

The DoJ until just recently was going after state-legal marijuana dispensaries, and the only reason they stopped was ta federal court told them they had to.

Obama could have stopped the DoJ with one phone call to his AG long before.



Political cowardice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama has now delivered a...