General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho couldn't see this coming from a mile away?
Last edited Thu Aug 18, 2016, 04:42 PM - Edit history (1)
WASHINGTON ― Texas experienced a sudden and dramatic spike in pregnancy-related deaths in 2011, the same year the state slashed funding for Planned Parenthood and womens health programs, according to a study in the September issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
After a modest increase in maternal mortality in Texas between 2000 and 2010, the rate of pregnancy-related deaths nearly doubled in 2011 and 2012 ― something researchers described as puzzling and out of sync with data from the other 49 states. Seventy-two women in Texas died from complications of pregnancy and childbirth in 2010, and that number jumped to 148 in 2012.
While the study does not suggest a clear cause for Texas alarming data, the rise in pregnancy-related deaths coincided with lawmakers slashing family planning funds by 66 percent in the state budget in 2011. The cuts forced 82 family planning clinics to close, one-third of which were Planned Parenthood clinics, and left Texas womens health program able to serve less than half as many women as it had previously served. Low-income women in particular had less access to affordable birth control and thus had more babies, according to a report by the Los Angeles Times.
The new data on pregnancy-related deaths is too dramatic to be explained only by the budget cuts to womens health, the study notes.
In the absence of war, natural disaster, or severe economic upheaval, the doubling of a mortality rate within a two year period in a state with almost 400,000 annual births seems unlikely, researchers write.
Texas Department of Health said a task force is looking into the issue but has not come up with an explanation or solution.
Were aware of the numbers and want to see a decrease in this trend, spokeswoman Carrie Williams told the Dallas Morning News, and thats why the task force is closely reviewing these cases and will make recommendations.
Edited to add link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/womens-health-texas_us_57b5d949e4b034dc73260bf3
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)Further proof that putting fundies in charge only invites unnecessary harm and hardship.
spooky3
(34,439 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)doncha know?
calimary
(81,220 posts)I note, with some sardonic amusement, this part:
"Texas Department of Health said a task force is looking into the issue but has not come up with an explanation or solution."
OF COURSE they're not going to come up with an explanation or a solution. They're not gonna want to admit to getting this SO damn wrong, nor will they somehow become willing to stop persecuting Planned Parenthood.
SHEESH - the statistics are a whole freakin' lot more than "puzzling." Good Grief...
tblue37
(65,336 posts)was soooooo surprised when they ended up with an HIV epidemic (and an associatec Hep C epidemic) among IV drug addicts.
His response to the epidemic caused by his stupidity was absurd: He okayed just a 30-day needle exchange program, limited to the single county identified as the epidemic's epicenter!
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/03/26/indiana-to-declare-health-emergency-for-hiv-outbreak/70478492/
Eventually he was forced to sign a more expansive (but still ridiculously limited) program when the epidemic spread, but counties had to prove they were already in trouble with the diseases spreading:
http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2015/05/05/pence-signs-bill-facilitate-needle-exchange-programs/26946043/
IOW, rather than prevent the epidemic of deadly diseases, they had to prove they were already swamped by new cases!
Indydem
(2,642 posts)The HIV outbreak in one county in southern Indiana spawned the exchange program.
tblue37
(65,336 posts)state had problems, Pence wouldn't okay a general program without conditions. The compromise that he finally signed required counties to prove they already had an epidemic before they would be allowed to implement a needle exchange program.
hunter
(38,311 posts)It would be even better if there were safe places for addicts to live where they could get safe drugs and the help they needed to quit the drugs they were addicted to. It also would be better for addicts who couldn't quit, for whatever reason.
Opiates are simply not as harmful as all the shit that goes along with any outlawed street drug.
Rush Limbaugh was imbibing enough clean pharmaceutical grade opiates to kill an elephant. Yet still he lives. Street drug junkies die.
lastlib
(23,216 posts)meaning, they're trying to make one up that doesn't upset their worldview that abortion, birth control, and women's health are the roots of all evil. Until they can find a way to cover their fundie arses without saying the new laws are the cause, they ain't gonna say or do nuttin'!
Chemisse
(30,809 posts)The mortality rate is deaths per live birth. So an increase in pregnancies would not account for it.
On edit - if the women's health programs included those for prenatal care, then this would make sense.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Since women who should avoid getting pregnant may not have been able to get birth control, more would die. Also, lack of access to abortion for dangerous pregnancies - tubal pregnancies for instance - can cause death of the woman.
Chemisse
(30,809 posts)And very young women who had unplanned pregnancies, and don't seek prenatal care.
Response to leftynyc (Original post)
MichiganVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
spanone
(135,827 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)See, all these librul women just waited until Texas did something lethally stupid in regard to prenatal care and women's health. Dozens of them stayed pregnant for years just so they could die in childbirth and embarrass Gov. Abbott and the Republican-dominated Texas legislature. It's all so clear, sheeple! James O'Keefe has a sting in the works where he poses as a pregnant woman and dies while giving birth; that'll show everyone the Truth!
Those damn libruls are too damn smart for us Texass Rednecks.
Warpy
(111,249 posts)it should be misogyny with a subset of extreme religious patriarchy.
These smug, godly jackasses won't be happy until all women are either penned up like cattle or dead. And yes, it is a sickness.
It's high time the rest of their sex recognize it for what it is.
n/t
byronius
(7,394 posts)It's what they do.
Euphoria
(448 posts)The honest unvarnished truth.
TygrBright
(20,758 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)TygrBright
(20,758 posts)Raine1967
(11,589 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Raine1967
(11,589 posts)It happens to the best of us.
ananda
(28,858 posts)That's what they are.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,892 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Never ceases to amaze me.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)In the absence of war, natural disaster, or severe economic upheaval, the doubling of a mortality rate within a two year period in a state with almost 400,000 annual births seems unlikely, researchers write.
Au contraire...there is no absence.
It IS a result of a war on women.
Forced pregnancy and without medical, reproductive prenatal care IS a natural disaster, for women.
Economically, the women most affected ARE already in a state of economic upheaval, which will get worse for family members in the case of a complicated death, or the addition of another mouth to feed.
montana_hazeleyes
(3,424 posts)I don't believe these evil asses are really religious at all. They are hypocrites to the extreme. They call themselves Christians, but do the opposite of what Jesus would do.
I hate this so much. Women and families suffering so much because of their phony grandstanding.
RapSoDee
(421 posts)Why do Republicans hate reality?
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)God I hate that place.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)Are they idiots???
raven mad
(4,940 posts)Which is why the repukes don't want anyone to have it.
sellitman
(11,606 posts)Who cares?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)In fact, more abortions are done in many red states because of their weirdness about birth control. It's that these women don't vote on that issue - maybe if this story gets out there in a viral sense, they'll change their minds.