General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Campaign Manager Fumbles Through Searing Interview With Maddow (VIDEO)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/maddow-interview-kellyanne-conway-muslim-ban-regretsTalking Points Memo.
Allegra Kirkland, Published 6:56 AM ET, 8/25/16
MSNBCs Rachel Maddow on Wednesday peppered Donald Trumps newly-minted campaign manager with questions on everything from his choice to campaign in states where hes ahead to his changing position on banning Muslim immigrants from the U.S., observing that much of the fallout from Trumps campaign has been the candidates own doing.
Kellyanne Conway gamely sat through the marathon interview that stretched to 45 minutes, but did not seem to convince Maddow that the Republican nominee was trying to make the presidential race about substance.
So much of this campaign and campaign coverage has been content-free cacophony, like no substance being discussed, and I think that's a shame for the voters, Conway said at the start of the conversation.
Some of the cacophony has been because your candidate has picked some unusual fights, because he has conducted himself as a candidate in a way that other campaigns haven't, Maddow replied.
Pushing Conway for specifics on what Trump meant when he last week expressed regrets for causing personal pain to some voters, Maddow asked if the Republican nominee would apologize to the federal judge whose Mexican heritage he criticized and to the parents of a slain Muslim American soldier who he attacked.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
If you hit link, you can view video.
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)Although Kellyanne Conway was clearly in over her head, I thought Rachel went soft on her. "Searing" was not how I would describe it at all.
HurricaneWarning
(220 posts)I think Rachel was setting up Trump to come on her show. If she had overwhelmed Kellyanne, it would never happen. Trump would be too afraid to come on. In his ego driven mind, he must be led to believe he'll get the better of Rachel. That's when the fun will begin. At least, I hope so.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,959 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,038 posts)He has retreated to the safety of the Fox noise bunker of the duration. Her time would have been better spent actually living up to the title of this thread. To be honest, I thought Rachel underperformed.
ArcticFox
(1,249 posts)Rachel Maddow list her edge long ago
BumRushDaShow
(128,482 posts)is considered "searing". It's just not done.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)But why is she treating him like a normal candidate anyway?
barbtries
(28,769 posts)why is anyone?! NPR is terrible in this respect. don't they know they'll have blood on their hands? at this point they already do because his rabid minority will not take losing well.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... She didn't seem to know a lot about her candidate. Lots of "I don't know" in there. Rachel just kept plugging away.
imanamerican63
(13,732 posts)It was like the questions were pre staged and answered with no hard facts, but were full of rhetoric. Probably, it is the only way the interview was going to happen, agreed on before? MSNBC trying to get more ratings? If Trump should ever agree to an interview, it will be more of the same BS! This the problem with to much media coverage. We have heard all the talking points for the past year and it is becoming old news for the most part.
Blue Idaho
(5,038 posts)They were abandoning their "Lean Forward" progressive friendly stance. They are now "Leaning Right" just like the rest of the entertainment/news on the TV.
Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)You lost me. This wasn't FOX!
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)What a tap dancer!
She is another who attempts to control the conversation with non stop talking and interruptions.
Still, she sounded more sane than tRump!
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Repubs are very good at using this tactic...And Left leaning pundits are not very good at stopping them.
See it over and over and over again..
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gish%20Gallop
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)She is a very smooth liar and Rachel let her know that mild regret statement wasn't enough.
Kellyanne is a great appointment by Trump because she's speaking to suburban white women to help them pretend it doesn't matter that he linked up with the racist Breitbart gang.
Kellyanne had to pivot to criticizing Hillary when she couldn't answer Rachel's questions.
She was a very smooth liar.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)part of the Gish Gallup
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gish%20Gallop
Overseas
(12,121 posts)busterbrown
(8,515 posts)When you see it.. It really bugs the crap of you.. Non stop talking points which never seem to end..mixed with 10% truth and 90% Bullshit...
The thing which is frustrating? The fact that the interviewer does not know to handle it 95% of the time..
Monk06
(7,675 posts)Unfortunately the different words do not describe the same policy but rather it`s opposite
Different words, samey same As if antonyms are synonyms because I say so
The Trump campaign is semantically challenged to the point, I believe, that they don`t know what they are saying from one minute to the next
They are as delusional as they are cynical
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Give it a rest.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 27, 2016, 10:13 AM - Edit history (1)
The MSM has provided him and his minions unrestricted access to spew their propaganda totally unchallenged. I am totally perplexed when they interview the token Black or Hispanic and allow them to spew their support of a person who represents a party that has striven to suppress their vote with unfounded claims that they are combating voter fraud. Time and time again I have suffered through watching these travesties in which the MSM reviewer doesn't offer even a hint of condemnation of outright lies. The Fourth Establishment is nothing more than a sham. A total complete failure.
appleannie1
(5,062 posts)she sure could not answer on anything with what that substance was. Not one particular thing. And her most constant phrase was "I don't know".
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)She'd let Conway dig a hole, and then gently push her into it.
A great example was the "extreme vetting" segment. Basically, Rachel got Conway to say that Trump's "extreme vetting" was just like the "Red scare" from decades ago ... and Conway fell for it because she had no idea what it was.
If you watch the interview closely, you can see this pattern repeat. It was more subtle than searing.
And by not crushing Conway like a bug ... Rachel keeps the potential for a visit from Don the con open. If she crushed her, Donny could claim victim status.
Raine
(30,540 posts)must have seen a different interview then the one I saw!
Justice
(7,185 posts)Rachel asked all the right questions (why Mississippi, why no substance etc.) - there were really no answers/responses.
Weird thing Kelly Anne kept saying - come to the tower, join us at the tower - referencing Maddow doing Trump interview at Trump Tower.