Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 09:01 AM Aug 2016

Whoopsie: Russian hackers post same document twice, but with glaring differences

Often, in war, mistakes are made. Sometimes, in Russia’s information war against the West, mistakes are made and then published for all the world to see.

That seems to be what happened when two supposedly independent hacking groups, believed by security experts to have ties to the Kremlin, posted the same documents stolen from a philanthropy run by George Soros. But the hack included a twist: Some of the documents taken by one group were altered in a bid to try and link Soros to Russian anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny, revealing how hackers likely working for Moscow are editing documents to smear their victims.

After hackers broke into a system for sharing documents at Soros’ Open Society Foundations, material describing the organization’s work in Russia appeared on two different sites: in November on the web platform of CyberBerkut, a pro-Russian hacking group that opposes Ukraine’s current government, and in June on DCLeaks.com, a website that hosts purloined documents and is believed by security researchers to be a Russian project.

Among the documents posted, at least three appear on both sites. The documents posted by CyberBerkut have been edited to try and show that Open Society provides significant financial support to Navalny.

CyberBerkut edited one budget document to include a line describing a grant to Navalny’s Foundation for Fighting Corruption to the tune of either $240,000 or $122,000 — CyberBerkut’s editors managed to put two different amounts on the same budget line. In another document titled, “Russia Project Strategy, 2014-2017,” Berkut added the name of Navalny’s foundation to a paragraph describing the lack in Russia of “institutions that focus analytically on issues of policy relevance.” By adding the Foundation for Fighting Corruption to that paragraph, Berkut falsely implied that Navalny’s group received financial support from Open Society. And Berkut edited a third document, which describes how Russian NGOs are complying with the country’s harsh laws governing civil society groups, to claim that Navalny receives support from Yandex, a Russian Internet services firm that competes with Google.

.........




http://www.ottawacitizen.com/News/12147705/story.html
http://www.peacock-panache.com/2016/07/russian-hackers-emails-wikileaks-23928.html
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/25/1563684/-Russian-Hackers-Accidentally-Post-Different-Versions-of-Stolen-Docs-Post-Steal-Editing

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoopsie: Russian hackers post same document twice, but with glaring differences (Original Post) kpete Aug 2016 OP
Russian hackers obviously have Republican "values" around honesty & integrity RapSoDee Aug 2016 #1
I'm thinking it's incumbent on the next Administration to thoroughly review the policies and actions Hugin Aug 2016 #2
That's interesting to think about. n/t fleabiscuit Aug 2016 #9
2 months ago, a DUer was ridiculing me for claiming that russian trolls even exist. DetlefK Aug 2016 #3
It was probably a Russian Troll. Hugin Aug 2016 #5
CyberBerkut. How cute. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 #4
Interesting... sarae Aug 2016 #6
Hopefully this will force the media sarae Aug 2016 #7
You're such a dreamer n/t Friend or Foe Aug 2016 #11
russia has two government sponsered hacking groups and they don't work together at all. Sunlei Aug 2016 #8
And of course, they can't tell Vladimir Vladimirovich that something wrong will be noticed friendly_iconoclast Aug 2016 #13
naturally... Blue_Tires Aug 2016 #10
K&R! Tarheel_Dem Aug 2016 #12

Hugin

(33,120 posts)
2. I'm thinking it's incumbent on the next Administration to thoroughly review the policies and actions
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 09:23 AM
Aug 2016

of the current Republican led Legislature and going back to say 2007 - 2012 looking for foreign influence. Especially, with a Russian sentiment.

I don't blame President Obama for this, but, I'm sure there may have been those in policy making positions who used the obstructionism and chaos of the government shutdown to implement policies that weren't in the best interest of the United States of America and had a direct foreign influence.


Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
4. CyberBerkut. How cute.
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 09:29 AM
Aug 2016

Last edited Thu Aug 25, 2016, 10:07 AM - Edit history (1)

Naming yourselves after Manafort's client (and Putin's tool) disgraced former Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovych's murderous band of thugs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkut_(special_police_force)

The "Berkut" (Ukrainian: Бе́ркут , eagle in English, specifically the Golden eagle, was the system of special police of the Ukrainian militsiya within the Ministry of Internal Affairs.[4][5] Since late March 2014 its Crimean unit in the Republic of Crimea defected to the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs preserving its old name.[1][2][3][6] Following the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, when Berkut was held responsible by the new government for most of the nearly 100 civilian deaths,[7] acting Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov signed a decree that dissolved the agency.[8][9] As a result of the 2014 Crimean crisis and the referendum in Crimea the Russian Federation granted accession to the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects of Russia on 21 March 2014.[10]A Three days later Russia announced that the Crimean Berkut unit would preserve its name as part of its defection from the Ukrainian authority to the Russian Interior Ministry.[3]

Berkut was Ukraine's successor to the Soviet OMON. It operated semi-autonomously and was governed at the local or regional level (oblast, raion, city). Initially used to fight organized crime, it became used as the Police (Militsiya) for Public Security. Its full name was "Berkut" Separate Special Assignment Unit(s) of Militsiya. There was a "Berkut" unit in every region (oblast) and every big city of the country. Among the several special police units in Ukraine, "Berkut" became a catchall name for all the others.

The main stated purpose (in Ukraine) of the national special force was crowd control; however, the Berkut have also been accused of taking part in racketeering, and of terrorizing, attacking, and torturing Ukrainian citizens,[11] including in recent years voters who would elect non-Yanukovych candidates to local governments.[12] and had a well-documented history of kidnapping, attack, and torture of protesters including during Euromaidan and to a lesser extent the Orange Revolution.

sarae

(3,284 posts)
7. Hopefully this will force the media
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 09:55 AM
Aug 2016

to question the accuracy and validity of any new "leaks" in the future.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
8. russia has two government sponsered hacking groups and they don't work together at all.
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 11:22 AM
Aug 2016

Those jobs must suck, you better produce what the leader wants or you're out of a job or worse.

Now that they were caught straight out hacking DNC files and caught dumping on wiki-leaks their connections to American politics must be exposed.

How come republicans were never hacked and files dumped? Russia is not helping the republican party for free.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
13. And of course, they can't tell Vladimir Vladimirovich that something wrong will be noticed
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 03:14 PM
Aug 2016

In an authoritarian state, not being a yes-man is bad for one's health...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoopsie: Russian hackers...