Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:11 PM Aug 2016

Survivors of the Aurora shooting have to pay at least $700,000 to theater chain

After a settlement deal fell apart, four survivors of the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting are left having to pay the Cinemark chain at least $700,000.

The failed settlement and financial repercussions were laid out Tuesday by the Los Angeles Times, which pieced together the story through interviews with people involved in the talks between the owners of the Century Aurora 16 mutliplex and 41 plaintiffs, including survivors and relatives of victims. A federal judge overseeing their case had advised the plaintiffs that they should settle with Cinemark within 24 hours. Another group of survivors had filed a state lawsuit, and a jury decided Cinemark could not have foreseen the shooting, which left 12 dead and more than 70 injured during a showing of The Dark Knight Rises. Because of that ruling, the judge said, he would most likely also find the chain not liable for the shooting.

As plaintiff Marcus Weaver told the Times, the group had to decide if they were willing to accept $150,000 split among 41 plaintiffs. He said he didn't think it was enough, but was satisfied that the company was going to have to take new measures to protect guests. The plaintiffs also knew if they rejected the deal and the case moved forward, under Colorado law they would be responsible for Cinemark's court fees.

http://theweek.com/speedreads/646024/survivors-aurora-shooting-have-pay-least-700000-theater-chain

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Survivors of the Aurora shooting have to pay at least $700,000 to theater chain (Original Post) mfcorey1 Aug 2016 OP
They were told beforehand Duckhunter935 Aug 2016 #1
Gun apologists unite against gun victims! onehandle Aug 2016 #2
Please explain how anyone is uniting against the victims here. bluesbassman Aug 2016 #5
They were foolish to go after Cinemark padfun Aug 2016 #3
My guess ... GeorgeGist Aug 2016 #10
I agree. It's the only thing that makes sense. padfun Aug 2016 #11
According to Trump's new advisor, Alex Jones, they're all "crisis actors" Adenoid_Hynkel Aug 2016 #4
Did they think that the judge was kidding? WillowTree Aug 2016 #6
Most of the plaintifs bailed out when it became clear what was likely to happen: DeadLetterOffice Aug 2016 #7
"Did they think that the judge was kidding?" Heeeeers Johnny Aug 2016 #9
I doubt that Cinemark will take any steps to collect. nt prayin4rain Aug 2016 #8
What this is about is lawyers seeing $$$ davidn3600 Sep 2016 #12
Meh Calculating Sep 2016 #13
The difference between a financial advisor and a fiduciary. ScepticD Sep 2016 #14
Let's see, $150k split 41 ways is $3,658.54, ucrdem Sep 2016 #15
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. They were told beforehand
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:13 PM
Aug 2016

What the consequences could be. That can happen when you go for the deep pockets in Colorado.

bluesbassman

(19,369 posts)
5. Please explain how anyone is uniting against the victims here.
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 08:01 PM
Aug 2016

Do you think Cinemark bears the resposibility for this? How were the supposed to prevent it?

And for the record I am in favor of common sense control.

padfun

(1,786 posts)
3. They were foolish to go after Cinemark
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:39 PM
Aug 2016

Cinemark isn't to blame for this. Go after the nut who actually shot people.

If this were successful, you could make it easier to sue just about every property owner for every bad thing that happens. The theater company had nothing to do with the murders except that that is where they happened.

GeorgeGist

(25,318 posts)
10. My guess ...
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 09:20 PM
Aug 2016

Some lawyer convinced them that Cinemark's deep pockets were ripe for the picking. He was wrong.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
4. According to Trump's new advisor, Alex Jones, they're all "crisis actors"
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:58 PM
Aug 2016

and no one died at Aurora, which was a plot by the gub'mint to take yer guns away.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
6. Did they think that the judge was kidding?
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 08:29 PM
Aug 2016

Not sure what part of "Something is better than less than nothing" was unclear to them.

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
7. Most of the plaintifs bailed out when it became clear what was likely to happen:
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 08:42 PM
Aug 2016
The plaintiffs also knew if they rejected the deal and the case moved forward, under Colorado law they would be responsible for Cinemark's court fees. As Cinemark drafted a press release announcing the settlement, one unidentified plaintiff rejected the deal. Weaver and 36 other plaintiffs quickly removed themselves from the suit, but four stayed on, and the judge ruled the next day in favor of Cinemark. The state court case cost $699,000, and the federal case is expected to be more.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
15. Let's see, $150k split 41 ways is $3,658.54,
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 03:13 AM
Sep 2016

about half the cost of an average funeral in Colorado, per US Funerals Online:

http://www.us-funerals.com/funeral-articles/funerals-and-cremations-in-colorado.html#.V8fTUWBriCg

Maybe the theater chain didn't intentionally harm its customers, but it's insured against accidents occurring on its premises presumably, and stiffing survivors like this is adding insult to injury. JMHO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Survivors of the Aurora s...