Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 03:10 PM Oct 2015

Democrats let $612B defense bill advance despite Obama veto threat

Source: The Hill

Legislation that would set the nation’s defense policy overcame a key procedural hurdle in the Senate on Tuesday despite a looming veto threat from the White House.

Senators voted 73-26 to end debate on the $612 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with 60 votes needed to move forward.

Twenty-one Democrats broke ranks on the procedural vote, siding with Republicans to let the bill advance. Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.), who is running for president, was the only Republican to vote no. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), another White House hopeful, missed the vote.

The legislation is expected to pass by Thursday, which would send it to President Obama’s desk.


Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/256061-dems-let-defense-bill-advance-despite-obama-veto-threat



Always plenty of money for the MIC
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats let $612B defense bill advance despite Obama veto threat (Original Post) n2doc Oct 2015 OP
But no food for poor people dorkzilla Oct 2015 #1
Yeah! Faux pas Oct 2015 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author saturnsring Oct 2015 #3
Except they just passed it with a veto-proof majority n2doc Oct 2015 #4
They didn't pass it...they just didn't filibuster it alcibiades_mystery Oct 2015 #7
dopey me, thanks saturnsring Oct 2015 #8
Probably the best chance to sustain a veto would be in the House. totodeinhere Oct 2015 #9
good thing no children are going hungry restorefreedom Oct 2015 #5
The problem is that this nullifies the sequester, making it a sequester for social programs only alcibiades_mystery Oct 2015 #6
we knew they would find a way to get what they want SoLeftIAmRight Oct 2015 #10

Response to n2doc (Original post)

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
5. good thing no children are going hungry
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 03:40 PM
Oct 2015

no wait,

good thing all the veterans are getting excellent care ...

no, wait,

good thing no one will freeze to death this winter from lack of heat,

no, wait..

the 1% will be able to keep their offshore accounts AND get rich off the defense bill!
thank goodness!

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. The problem is that this nullifies the sequester, making it a sequester for social programs only
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 03:50 PM
Oct 2015

The whole point of the sequester was to cause mutual pain (social and defense) so that they would pass a compromise budget. If the military end of the sequester is nullified, then we only have social cuts, which is what the Republicans wanted in the first place. Obama should veto it and make them override.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrats let $612B defen...