as Bill Maher said on his show tonight, you wouldn't want a president who wasn't calculating.

What point is there in hiring a dyscalculiac for President?

dys·cal·cu·li·a: severe difficulty in making arithmetical calculations, as a result of brain disorder.


Only this disorder is in the heart and mind, I think.

No. I don't.

And not just on behalf of themselves and their rich buddies.

... necessitate working AGAINST Wall Street and the global financial elite by not giving them everything their greedy hearts desire then I might welcome that President.

That is not the case in HRC's situation. She's playing us (not the financial elite) in my opinion.

"Calculating" and "lying sack of shit" are distinct characteristics.

Someone who thinks it's the same to be canny as to be a liar (at any rate, a person incapable of caring what's true and what's not) is a good definition of a sociopath.

Birds of a feather!

didn't =know how= to calculate ... such as stupid like the Repubs

It's too much, this sudden change of support/disagreement on so many important issues right before the debate. People are seeing through it.

That and the more people are of Sanders, the more they love him

#FeelTheBern

That ten points, from 51 to 41 represents TWENTY PERCENT OF HER SUPPORTERS, in less than one week. The comments following the article rip her to absolute shreds, which is exactly what would happen to her as the Democratic candidate in the general election. The comments are much more focused on her perceived lack of consistency, honesty, humility and integrity than on the email controversy.

Her falling numbers are quite astounding, considering how high her ratings were when she started pouring all the millions she's had at her disposal into her campaign. It's like some nouveau riche arriviste has bought a huge mansion, but lacks the self-confidence to furnish/decorate it herself, or even settle on one designer. So she hires a different consultant for each room and the result is elaborate, ostentatious chaos.

The Clintons have a more-is-better view of life. More consultants, more unpaid "interns", more posh fundraising soirees, more private jet travel, etc. Quantity over quality. Style over substance.

"if there's a sizzle there has to be a steak. VOTE STEAK" since even the late 80s

enough to cover up for her short comings. On the bright side if she manages to win she'll probably be tough enough to give republicans hell still I just don't trust her on the issues not to turn her back on her base.

similar to the last 7 years.

If she wins, we'll see a lot of 'working across the aisle', with more crap sandwiches hailed as significant 'victories' and a continuation of trickle-down policies. Oh, and more war.

First primaries are in January.

She's gonna drop like a rock.

if I was a betting man I'd bet the farm on that.

You really think the KKKlown KKKar can beat her?

Which member, exactly?

Criminee, that campaign isn't leaking, it's hemorrhaging. ONE week? I honestly have never seen a campaign in a free fall like this. This won't get better for her. It's almost certain Biden will have to jump in how if the DNC is going to save their Paid Shill program.

All this "Will He...Won't He" and broadcasting his "grief issues" (valid as they are) is starting to get on people's nerves, though.

but I'm beginning to think he's only going to enter the race if HRC implodes. He probably doesn't see the point of 2 centrists running against each other, and frankly, I don't really think he wants it. I think Beau's deathbed request may be the only reason he's even considering it

The one thing I'll say for him is that I don't think the GOP hates him like they hate Hillary; that white hot burning hate of a thousand suns.

....Sanders' "slide"? He was at 30% in this poll a few weeks ago.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll is all over the place, and they release a "rolling average" every few days. Not accurate at all.

It's about people being informed by the media that maybe the media was less than 100% correct about Secretary Clinton being inevitable. It's now OK for people to listen to other candidates, who, by the way, are actively campaigning.

and adapting her campaign to be what she thinks people want. she is willing to talk like she set aside her procorporate attitudes temporarily and pretend to support what the progressives want

jeez, how picky can some people be?









(in case there were any doubts)

[link: