Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,444 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:31 PM Mar 2016

Connecticut Moves Away From Private Insurers to Administer Medicaid Program

Source: WSJ

At a time when most states are paying private insurers to provide health care for their Medicaid recipients, Connecticut says it has saved money and improved care by going the opposite way. In 2012, Connecticut fired the companies that were running Husky, as its Medicaid system is known, and returned to a more traditional “fee-for-service” arrangement where the state reimburses doctors and hospitals directly.

State officials, physicians and patient advocates have welcomed the move: Average cost per patient, per month, is down from $718 in mid-2012 to $670 last year, according to state data. The number of doctors willing to treat Medicaid patients is up 7% and as a result fewer patients are using emergency rooms for routine care.

(snip)

States have turned to managed care as a way to control spending, particularly those that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Health plans say they can provide better, more-coordinated care and save states money—some $6.4 billion this year, according to an estimate prepared for the Association for Community Affiliated Plans, which represents nonprofit health plans in 26 states.

Other reports say managed care’s record with Medicaid has been mixed. With some exceptions, a county-by-county study by the nonpartisan Urban Institute last year found no evidence that greater reliance on managed care cut costs, but it did increase the likelihood of ER visits, difficulty seeing specialists, and unmet need for prescription drugs.



Read more: http://www.wsj.com/articles/connecticut-moves-away-from-private-insurers-to-administer-medicaid-program-1458325696

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Connecticut Moves Away From Private Insurers to Administer Medicaid Program (Original Post) question everything Mar 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #1
+1 mountain grammy Mar 2016 #2
I don't have problem with each state looking at all alternatives question everything Mar 2016 #3
yes but the WTO and RGFS and TPP and TTIP and CAFTA likely do Baobab Mar 2016 #14
here, read this Baobab Mar 2016 #15
This likely violates several trade deals we're signatory to Baobab Mar 2016 #13
This sounds great but how does it help Wall Street? jalan48 Mar 2016 #4
That is the whole point isn't it. LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #5
Iowa will jump into April fools day on that PatrynXX Mar 2016 #6
K&R. Glad to hear it. Overseas Mar 2016 #7
OMG, don't tell the GOP that government can do something cheaper and better than private sinkingfeeling Mar 2016 #8
It is ok to tell them elljay Mar 2016 #11
It won't be long before the insurers sue the state of CT, if they haven't already. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #9
Can't. Chan790 Mar 2016 #16
So is what CT did called managed care? I liked the old jwirr Mar 2016 #10
This it great Andy823 Mar 2016 #12

Response to question everything (Original post)

question everything

(47,444 posts)
3. I don't have problem with each state looking at all alternatives
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:38 PM
Mar 2016

Clearly for states like Texas, that prefer millions of uninsured to taking the money from ACA to support Medicaid, the path will be different.

Some years back NY started an experiment to limit the continuous sedation of people at nursing homes and hospices. Saw excellent results but I don't know how it ended.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
14. yes but the WTO and RGFS and TPP and TTIP and CAFTA likely do
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 06:18 PM
Mar 2016

They all have dozens of provisions designed to stop any new public services from being created. They can only be dismantled.

its claimed that they are trade barriers that devalue markets and block foreign investment in the country.

If health insurance is too expensive just get a higher deductible cafeteria style foil paper level plan from a Rwandan health insurer.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
13. This likely violates several trade deals we're signatory to
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 06:14 PM
Mar 2016

I hope that this isnt just part of a cover up of that fact.

elljay

(1,178 posts)
11. It is ok to tell them
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:43 PM
Mar 2016

They already know that any fact that contradicts their beliefs is untrue. The word "fact" has been turned into an oxymoron by a bunch of "morans."

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
16. Can't.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 08:08 PM
Mar 2016

They're headquartered here for the most part and the state of CT has had enough of their shit. Travelers pulled some crap like that and the state legislature threatened to pass a windfall tax on insurance revenues. Travelers backed down.

It seems that you're just really fucked when your entire industry is dependent on workers with a specialist skillset of navigating byzantine and arcane regulations and that skillset only exists within 30 miles of your current location because there is no training or has never been any point in training anybody in it anywhere else. They can't relocate because nobody anywhere else in America knows how to do the jobs they'd need to fill if they moved to...say...NYC or South Carolina or Delaware.

More than that, we did something mean...we barred out of state companies from participation in the AccessHealthCT exchange.

There is no Kaiser in AHCT because they don't have offices here. For years you couldn't get insurance in CT from State Farm or Farmers because they're not CT-based insurers and the insurance commissioner wouldn't approve them unless they relocated to Hartford.

Please let them sue the state of CT...we really need to repave Asylum St. in Downtown and nothing would be as pretty as solid-gold curbs paid for with a fuck-you tax on their profits.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
10. So is what CT did called managed care? I liked the old
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:43 PM
Mar 2016

MA system. And before 1980 all medicaid was run specifically by the government. However, I do think that Blue Cross/Blue Shield administered it. The insurance companies just didn't get to call the shots.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
12. This it great
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:50 PM
Mar 2016

The more states do things like this, and if it works to lower costs, help those in need, and keep the Doctors happy, it will set an example for other states to try it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Connecticut Moves Away Fr...