Troopers: Bear Mauls Guides After Group Got Close to Cub
Source: Associated Press
Troopers: Bear Mauls Guides After Group Got Close to Cub
By rachel d'oro, associated press
ANCHORAGE, Alaska Aug 19, 2016, 8:09 PM ET
A brown bear mauled two wilderness guides who were leading a hiking excursion in Alaska after the group came between the female animal and her cub in the Tongass National Forest, state troopers said Friday.
The guides a man and a woman were rescued by the Coast Guard after being injured Thursday on a trail on Chichagof Island about 30 miles north of Sitka in southeast Alaska. Troopers said the bears left the area after one of the victims used pepper spray.
Authorities said they have no plans to hunt down the bear, and the guides' employer said their injuries were not life-threatening though one of the two was airlifted to Seattle and undergoing treatment in intensive care.
Forest Service law enforcement officers and state wildlife troopers have determined the attack was a defensive, non-predatory move and the bear will not be pursued at this time, said Sitka District Ranger Perry Edwards.
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/coast-guard-airlifts-guides-mauled-bear-alaska-41514846
napi21
(45,806 posts)between a mama & he cub? I''m sure no guide, and don't live in Alaska, but we do have bears in Pa. where I grew up, and in Ga. where I now live. we were taught that bears are fun to watch, and bear cubs are even funnier, but NEVER let mama feel you're a threat to her cub! Bears mostly avoid people and unless you leave food accessible to them, they'll not be a problem for you.
How a guide didn't know that or abide by it baffles me.
I'm also surprised they weren't hurt worse. Mama Bear is usually very rough when protecting her kids!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and I'm sure those guides did too. Problem is, people can inadvertently be in the wrong place between a bear and her cubs, or a bear and a food cache, or they can be unlucky enough to get near a bear with a toothache, or one that was shot 10 years earlier and has never forgotten it.
I heard both of those last two stories when I lived in Alaska, and also heard the opinion that there is no such thing as an unprovoked attack...but you may not know what provoked it.
Stuff happens in bear country. Be prepared (like with pepper spray, as they were), make plenty of noise when hiking, don't do anything stupid (like running away)...and you still might get in a bad situation. I once walked into a clearing (while talking loudly to invisible bears and jingling my bear bells) only to be confronted by a sow brown bear ( same thing as a grizzly but bigger) to my left and two cubs to my right. Fortunately the cubs in this case were year-old juveniles and so momma was not as protective as with the little ones. I backed away slowly, they lumbered off, I eventually carried on ( oddly my voice was somewhat dysfunctional...). I was lucky. Not everyone is.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)You can always ID bear poop that way.
Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)With someone slower than yourself.
Heh.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)is a good way to survive bear attacks and the zombie apocalypse
UnFettered
(79 posts)I was out for a trail ride on my bike one day and almost ran into a moma and cub. I made a trun in the trail and they were right there 30 yards away.
Thankfully they just ran off.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)Mama bear could have been off the trail behind them and the cubs nearer to the trail and in front of them.
It's happened to me on several occasions. Luckily, I wasn't attacked but the mama bear charged me a couple of times only to back off when she saw the cubs had run off in her direction.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)COMPLETELY accidental, I assure you
believe it or not, youngsters can get in the habit of running around / not paying attention to mom
cstanleytech
(26,242 posts)It could have simply been an issue of the cubs sleeping off the side of the trail under some cover and mama bear roamed off a bit to take care of some business and the guides simply came along and didnt know that they had gotten between the bear and her cubs.
Response to napi21 (Reply #1)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)Why in the hell would they jail the guides or the tourists? That makes no sense whatsoever. What crime did they commit?
Or am I misreading sarcasm? I really hope I'm misreading sarcasm.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Here - in your re-reading pay attention to the fact that the guides fucked up.
"
The bears would not have exhibited a defensive reaction unless they led these people too close, and it is hard to type that any slower.
The bears aren't like humans who go looking for trouble where there isn't any. Something I am guessing you know a bit about.
We won't need to talk again.
Oh, and just in case - that last isn't sarcasm,.
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)I'd put together a rebuttal, but I think it's clear that a) you're not interested in discussion, just in being snarky, and b) you're not worth that many keystrokes.
cstanleytech
(26,242 posts)what they did and it could have simply been a case of the guides just not being aware that they had gotten between the bear and her cubs.
Response to jtuck004 (Reply #12)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)I was going to say much the same thing, but it was pretty evident that the person you're responding to is more interested in being a jerk than in having a discussion. And I have zero experience hiking in bear country. It just seemed pretty obvious that one might not know the bears are there until one is practically on top of them.
Response to Sand Rat Expat (Reply #33)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)Especially since moose are powerful critters and easily capable of stomping predators to death, let alone squishy humans. Very glad no one in your family was injured!
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)Jailing people for inadvertently encountering bears while hiking just seems more than a little bizarre to me. Glad I'm not the only one who found that suggestion strange.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)brooklynite
(94,362 posts)...the 500 lbs of cow charged us and we had to throw ourselves into a hedge to get out of the way.
NEVER get between a female animal and her baby.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I was once on a birding hike on a friend's ranch when we came across a group of cows with a couple calves. The only city person among us headed straight for "oooh, that cute little baby cow" even after the cow had pushed her calf behind her. The idiot didn't stop till I yelled "Who's your next of kin?"
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)... in the Winter now.
I also hate trying to sleep in the heat and dealing with mosquitoes.
Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)I have good Winter gear with a double sleeping bag system (inside a waterproof bivy sack) to keep me warm at night.
Ohio leaves many of their parks open all year long, plus there's free camping in national forests with certain restrictions.
Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)It makes complete sense to consider hiking when the bears are horizontal, and the bugs aren't gunning for you.
Didn't even know there were any double systems.
Best wishes on your journeys, and thank you!
PufPuf23
(8,755 posts)out of Sitka (and also 3 other similar projects elsewhere on the Tongass NF) between 1992 and 1995.
The USFS contracts included Safety Plans that directly addressed bears.
Where brown bears were resident, field crews were required to be accompanied by a dedicated (only job was as look out and security) armed guard.
The Sitka project was at Ushk Bay on Chichagof Island is a brown bear area. The prime contractor provided the security and we did fieldwork in mixed teams. If we knew brown bear were active in an area, we adjusted plans accordingly. We worked from a floating camp and were ferried back and forth to work areas by helicopter. Part of the project was wildlife biologists engaged in accessing and mapping habitat and making population estimates so there was little danger of a surprise. The study area was 70,000 acres.
[img][/img]
The last project I worked on in SE Alaska was administered by the USFS in Petersburg and the location was Port Houghton.
[img][/img]
I had three employees resident on a floating camp from May to September and I made 5 trips 10 day to two week trips between April and September. There were about 40-45 people working from the floating camp at any one time. There never was an incident.
When only black bears were resident (and common), one could go with gun or pepper spray and could work (and we often did) alone. Pepper spray was required to be in one's possession while in the field. Similar to Ushk Bay, we hopped around by helicopter (the study area was 190,000 acres)
I was responsible for the Safety Plan for myself and employees. I provided a .358 Magnum (that belonged to my BIL) and a 16 gauge shotgun and we all had pepper spray. The fire arms never left the floating camp except once when we starting work we took part of a day to practice shooting the arms.
Our own Safety Plan was if they were working with me was to spray me hard with pepper spray and run like hell.
One thing different from now is that GPS units were not required nor in common usage back in the early 1990s.
Black bear photo (from internet) taken in Port Houghton study area.
[img][/img]
Brown bear photo (also internet).
[img][/img]
BTW The projects and EISs were for road building and large timber sale projects to serve then existing long term contracts the USFS had with pulp mills in Sitka and Ketchikan. The projects went to court and none of the large areas were ever roaded nor logged.
Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)maxrandb
(15,298 posts)Come on DU
cstanleytech
(26,242 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Please, stay safe indoors and we'll send you pictures...
Response to Earth_First (Reply #26)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.