Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,791 posts)
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 06:02 PM Aug 2016

Relief granted to transgender students fighting North Carolina's bathroom law

Source: Reuters

A U.S. judge on Friday blocked the University of North Carolina from enforcing a state law requiring transgender people to use single-sex restrooms and locker rooms that correspond to the gender on their birth certificate.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder's order granting a preliminary injunction applies only to the three transgender plaintiffs named in a lawsuit challenging the measure, known as House Bill 2 or HB 2. North Carolina in March became the first U.S. state to bar people from using restrooms in government buildings and public schools consistent with their gender identity.

“In short, UNC may not apply HB2’s one-size-fits-all approach to what must be a case-by-case inquiry,” wrote Schroeder, noting that his order effectively returned all involved to the status quo before the new law passed “wherein public agencies accommodated the individual transgender Plaintiffs on a case-by-case basis, rather than applying a blanket rule to all people in all facilities under all circumstances.”

The judge, an appointee of Republican former President George W. Bush, heard oral arguments in the case on Aug. 1 in Winston-Salem.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lgbt-idUSKCN1112F1



U.S. | Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:40pm EDT
By Colleen Jenkins | WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Relief granted to transgender students fighting North Carolina's bathroom law (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2016 OP
Interesting wording, that headline. Wednesdays Aug 2016 #1
Why is it that pro-trans judges rule strictly for the exact people in the case, but Crash2Parties Aug 2016 #2
He had the opportunity to do so because the Texas case involved a Federal rule interpretation... Princess Turandot Aug 2016 #3
Thanks! :-) Crash2Parties Aug 2016 #4

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
2. Why is it that pro-trans judges rule strictly for the exact people in the case, but
Fri Aug 26, 2016, 11:08 PM
Aug 2016

the anti trans ones do things like set nationwide injunctions?

Princess Turandot

(4,785 posts)
3. He had the opportunity to do so because the Texas case involved a Federal rule interpretation...
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 12:40 AM
Aug 2016

which affected the entire country. The reason he made it a nationwide preliminary injunction, which was not required of him, even though the issue is now before other federal districts courts? He's a Republican judge in Texas? Another Republican judge in Texas did the same thing with PBO's immigration order. I think he claimed that his ruling did not relate to the issue itself, but rather, was based upon a procedural error on the part of the government. Meanwhile, another circuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, didn't see that problem.

The UNC case could not have resulted in a nationwide injunction because it involved an NC state law, rather than a federal one.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Relief granted to transge...