Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:18 PM Sep 2012

Obama campaign mobilizing thousands of lawyers to combat voter ID laws, voting restrictions

Source: Cronkite News Service

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- President Barack Obama's reelection campaign and the Democratic National Committee are coordinating and deploying thousands of lawyers to help voters deal with an array of recent voting law changes, according to national and state campaign officials.

Democrats and voting rights group say laws enacted across the country, from voter ID requirements to restrictions on third-party registration groups to shortened early-voting windows, are enacted largely by Republican legislatures and governors in a systematic effort to disenfranchise likely Democratic voters. Republicans across the country have said the changes are about preventing election fraud.

"The entire Republican program built around this anti-fraud theme had many component parts," said Robert Bauer, the lead lawyer for both the Democratic National Convention and Organizing for America, Obama's reelection campaign. "All of them organized around a central objective of disenfranchisement."

Bauer made the comments Thursday during a Voting Rights Institute meeting at the Democratic National Convention. The Voting Rights Institute, created by the DNC after the 2000 election, also held a voter-suppression panel that blasted voting law changes in Florida, Ohio and other states.

Bauer said the changes to the laws could make local election officials, many of whom he said were trying to do the right thing, make mistakes that disenfranchise voters.

"Votes lost," Bauer said. "Votes cast not counted. Voters turned away at the polls."


Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/09/07/20120907BC-CNS-DNC-Voting-Rights.html#ixzz25oxzuOqK

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/09/07/20120907BC-CNS-DNC-Voting-Rights.html

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama campaign mobilizing thousands of lawyers to combat voter ID laws, voting restrictions (Original Post) trailmonkee Sep 2012 OP
better way late...than never eh? nt msongs Sep 2012 #1
Sure, the Obama administration doesn't really care about this issue. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #5
No, you are wrong, and apparently not paying attention...they did this in 2008 too CreekDog Sep 2012 #7
Um...I worked for them during the 2008 elections, am working for them in the 2012 one.... msanthrope Sep 2012 #13
The same sort of announcement agent46 Sep 2012 #2
Yea, the Obama campaign clearly has no idea how to win an election. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #6
Yeah, this isn't Cha Sep 2012 #8
your ignorance of an effort doesn't mean it did not happen CreekDog Sep 2012 #9
10,000 lawyers pocoloco Sep 2012 #18
Completely agree with you about the hackable (and rabid republican-owned) electronic voting equitpmt JudyM Sep 2012 #11
I believe the word you wanted in the second sentence of your post is "aptly" instead of "amply". juajen Sep 2012 #12
Thanks, Juajen, I meant amply, though it surely hasn't gotten enough MSM reporting, JudyM Sep 2012 #25
I hope they're making an effort in my state, Pennsylvania. drm604 Sep 2012 #3
We are. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #14
Who is we? drm604 Sep 2012 #16
I will be there on election day, as a Democratic observer, and so will hundreds of other msanthrope Sep 2012 #17
Good to know. drm604 Sep 2012 #19
In Reno/Sparks in 2008, the campaign had lawyers and law students almost everywhere CreekDog Sep 2012 #21
ahem typo? it's supposedly to prevent voter fraud not election fraud PatrynXX Sep 2012 #4
it's not to protect against "voter fraud", come on...read the danged article next time! CreekDog Sep 2012 #10
The announcement may be news but the planning is not news. I have been signed up for awhile. Justice Sep 2012 #15
-------------------- randome Sep 2012 #20
Haha! LishaD35 Sep 2012 #22
We are going to need the army of lawyers and observers davidpdx Sep 2012 #23
I am asking for your opinion on something that I have been thinking about. olegramps Sep 2012 #24
Makes me wanna move to a swing state and help. lindysalsagal Sep 2012 #26
It might have been more helpful had they put up more of a fight dflprincess Sep 2012 #27
they said this in 2004 too, and then did...nothing. yurbud Sep 2012 #28

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
5. Sure, the Obama administration doesn't really care about this issue.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:39 PM
Sep 2012

So they ignored it. And now they are "late".

Because that helps them how, exactly?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
7. No, you are wrong, and apparently not paying attention...they did this in 2008 too
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:40 PM
Sep 2012

as election day approaches, what they are doing is preparing to have lawyers on the ground to meet and help voters. you don't do that in *March*!

this is what they did in 2008. i volunteered in Nevada and saw it first hand, they had lawyers and law students at precincts all over the place and they were there to help assure that people could vote --in fact, they were there to assure that any eligible voter could vote, regardless of whom they were supporting.

their organization was so thorough and so coordinated, i've never seen anything like it and for you to ignorantly run them down like they are not paying attention is unfair.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
13. Um...I worked for them during the 2008 elections, am working for them in the 2012 one....
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 08:47 PM
Sep 2012

They've been around.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
2. The same sort of announcement
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:24 PM
Sep 2012

The same sort of announcement went out about sending thousands of lawyers to prevent election fraud in 2004. Not a peep was heard from them again as the Dems rolled over afterward. I'll believe this when I see it. So far the Dems seem to be for the most part unaware of the dangers of hackable proprietary electronic voting systems.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. Yea, the Obama campaign clearly has no idea how to win an election.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:40 PM
Sep 2012

What's your point ... the Dems are hoping to LOSE?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
9. your ignorance of an effort doesn't mean it did not happen
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:48 PM
Sep 2012

I witnessed it in Reno/Sparks in 2008, it was thorough, there were a ton of lawyers and law students and they covered precincts all over the place, in fact, they sometimes had more than one attorney per voting location.

They were all over this.

JudyM

(29,206 posts)
11. Completely agree with you about the hackable (and rabid republican-owned) electronic voting equitpmt
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:39 PM
Sep 2012

I keep waiting to hear something about that!! Such BS since the Kerry campaign and so easy to disenfranchise voters that way, as has been amply reported/analyzed... IMO voting equipmt should be federally managed, not privately and secretively run.

juajen

(8,515 posts)
12. I believe the word you wanted in the second sentence of your post is "aptly" instead of "amply".
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 07:58 PM
Sep 2012

Just a hello from an old member of DU. I don't correct all the time, just some of the time. Aren't you lucky?

JudyM

(29,206 posts)
25. Thanks, Juajen, I meant amply, though it surely hasn't gotten enough MSM reporting,
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:53 AM
Sep 2012

but the facts/questionable activities and results have been reported from all corners. So correction?: not so much, but your implicit point about the MSM itself not reporting is a good one! And you are an old Duer... I'll welcome your comments any time -

drm604

(16,230 posts)
3. I hope they're making an effort in my state, Pennsylvania.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:31 PM
Sep 2012

We're going to need all the help we can get.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. I will be there on election day, as a Democratic observer, and so will hundreds of other
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:20 PM
Sep 2012

attorneys in Philly alone. Did it in 2008 and 2010.

The Obama campaign and the DNC coordinate and send us.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
21. In Reno/Sparks in 2008, the campaign had lawyers and law students almost everywhere
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:45 PM
Sep 2012

all our key precincts. i was counting voters at 3 precincts (one location though) and Obama campaign had 3 law students, one for each precinct. some would observe, others would be available on the outside for questions.

the campaign in 2008 was so thorough, so planned, so coordinated, they didn't miss a beat.

the Obama campaign then, overdid and overdid everything, just to be sure. they really didn't mess around.

it worked so well that i was sent home early, as were the attorneys, because all our targeted voters had voted well before the polls closed.

Nevada went from a losing by 2.5% margin to winning by 12%.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
4. ahem typo? it's supposedly to prevent voter fraud not election fraud
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:32 PM
Sep 2012

voter fraud never happens. election fraud is what the republicans are doing by enacting such laws..

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
10. it's not to protect against "voter fraud", come on...read the danged article next time!
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:10 PM
Sep 2012

it's to make sure eligible voters are able/allowed to cast their ballots.

if you're going to comment on an article, you could at least read it first.

Justice

(7,185 posts)
15. The announcement may be news but the planning is not news. I have been signed up for awhile.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:11 PM
Sep 2012

I did this in 2004, 2008 and now 2012

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. --------------------
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:35 PM
Sep 2012
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&biw=1024&bih=485&tbm=isch&tbnid=wox5bCmOUgLBbM:&imgrefurl=http://www.longstoryshortpier.com/2009/01/09/ottos-rede&docid=uv89Bm6D39A3qM&imgurl=&w=488&h=331&ei=X6BKUJuDKeGW2QWeqYCgDg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=77&vpy=151&dur=805&hovh=185&hovw=273&tx=165&ty=74&sig=106415036804199459274&page=1&tbnh=129&tbnw=146&start=0&ndsp=10&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i 3

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
23. We are going to need the army of lawyers and observers
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 05:24 AM
Sep 2012

to make sure they don't pull shit like they did in 2000 & 2004. I am appreciative of everyone who is able to go and do this on election day.

olegramps

(8,200 posts)
24. I am asking for your opinion on something that I have been thinking about.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:52 AM
Sep 2012

What if those who do not have the proper ID to vote are bused by the thousands to the polls and demand their right to vote? Perhaps it is not feasible, but if it was it seems that it would call attention to dishonest disenfranchisement of millions of voters. It could be a real Tea Party event in which the denial of citizens rights would be opening demonstrated to be nothing more than voter suppression. This could be especially effective if it involved veterans who served during war time and because of their age may not qualify or even have the need for a drivers license or what ever ID they are demanding.

lindysalsagal

(20,592 posts)
26. Makes me wanna move to a swing state and help.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 03:01 PM
Sep 2012

Will be interesting to see if they pull a Schrub '04, with broken machines and no parking, endless lines, etc.

I somehow think Shrub needed his daddy's cronies to pull it off. Election fraud has since sent dozens to jail. It's a big risk. Will there be fools loyal enough to romney with the local backing to pull it off, in this age of cell phones, tweeting, and portable broadcasting?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama campaign mobilizing...