Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,968 posts)
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:20 PM Sep 2012

Ann Romney Declines To Answer Questions On Gay Marriage, Contraception

Source: Huffington Post

"Here in Iowa, as you know, same-sex marriage is legal. Do you believe a lesbian mother should be allowed to marry her partner?" David Nelson, a KWQC anchor asked.

"You know, I'm not going to talk about the specific issues," Romney responded, adding that "hot-button issues" distract from the economy.

Nelson then asked whether employers should be required to provide health insurance that covers birth control. The Romney campaign has attacked the Obama administration for adopting a rule requiring most religiously affiliated employers to provide coverage for contraception in their health plans.

She declined to answer. "Again, you're asking me questions that are not about what this election is going to be about. This election is going to be about the economy and jobs."

-snip-

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/07/ann-romney-gay-marriage-contraception_n_1865430.html



This was an interview Ann Romney did with Davenport IA station KWQC. It will be broadcast tonight, but the transcript is online:

http://m.kwqc.com/default.aspx?pid=2705&wnfeedurl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.kwqc.com%2fstory%2f19484978%2fanne-romney-kwqc-tv6-interview-transcript%3fclienttype%3drssstory

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ann Romney Declines To Answer Questions On Gay Marriage, Contraception (Original Post) highplainsdem Sep 2012 OP
Clearly, she and her husband disapprove of gay people having closeupready Sep 2012 #1
Everything is a "hot button" issue to Spinderella and her Prince Smarming aint_no_life_nowhere Sep 2012 #36
Spinderella and her spinning Prince goclark Sep 2012 #38
"Do you think it's right that your horse has better health care than most Americans" - hmmm nt msongs Sep 2012 #2
+1. Couldn't have said it better... nt riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #11
Wow! I guess "gay-bashing-as-Republican's-bread-and-butter" is coming to an end. MNBrewer Sep 2012 #3
more like your not asking what I think you should be asking.... PatrynXX Sep 2012 #4
What arrogance - people can vote on whatever issues they choose karynnj Sep 2012 #5
Very true lexw Sep 2012 #6
Why do you hate Ann's America? JoePhilly Sep 2012 #8
cause I can't afford a pony. olddad56 Sep 2012 #15
Set up a shell corporation in the Caymans, then have that company buy the pony ... JoePhilly Sep 2012 #25
Agreed. Really bizarre and arrogant. I hope the teevee producer doesn't cut that nt riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #10
They clearly have her muzzled... WestWisconsinDem Sep 2012 #7
In other words mojo2012 Sep 2012 #9
She really isn't qualified to speak on any issue. That being said, olddad56 Sep 2012 #12
I was just wondering the same thing today, after having a great Pro-Obama, Anti-Mitt conversation w/ smirkymonkey Sep 2012 #18
It's good to hear an immigrant is so passionate about being invovled davidpdx Sep 2012 #28
I suppose this is why R/R wan't to block immigrant voting smirkymonkey Sep 2012 #32
I disagree, I would bet she's a fairly smart woman davidpdx Sep 2012 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author olddad56 Sep 2012 #13
Sounds like mainstreetonce Sep 2012 #14
That would be sooooooo cool. SmittynMo Sep 2012 #34
Ohh Noos!!! DemKittyNC Sep 2012 #16
Just a No elbloggoZY27 Sep 2012 #17
Democrats have husbands, wives, spouses, partners, lovers. aquart Sep 2012 #26
"this election is going to be about the economy and jobs." BECAUSE SHE SAID SO! LibGranny Sep 2012 #19
Is she an economist? JohnnyRingo Sep 2012 #20
''We believe that we've told 'you people' all you need to know.'' DeSwiss Sep 2012 #21
love heaven05 Sep 2012 #22
C'affiche, c'est magnifique! closeupready Sep 2012 #37
Ugh. n/t spiderpig Sep 2012 #23
Yeah, Ann, whether people can marry or not, or whether they have more children or not patrice Sep 2012 #24
Just as artificial as her husband unit. nt onehandle Sep 2012 #27
She talks about the economy, and then claims "I'm here to really just talk about my husband ... muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #30
"We are not amused by these Questions!" Hab Habit Sep 2012 #31
This is so typical. SmittynMo Sep 2012 #33
Dear Ann, CrispyQ Sep 2012 #35
DThe economy and jobs....NOT! luv_mykatz Sep 2012 #39
Need to add: luv_mykatz Sep 2012 #40
When Romney came out against wind subsidies he gave Iowa the final shove to Obama. grantcart Sep 2012 #41
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
1. Clearly, she and her husband disapprove of gay people having
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:22 PM
Sep 2012

intimate romantic relationships with other people.

goclark

(30,404 posts)
38. Spinderella and her spinning Prince
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:31 PM
Sep 2012

Both of them are out to lunch!

They need to take a long vacation and come back in December

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
3. Wow! I guess "gay-bashing-as-Republican's-bread-and-butter" is coming to an end.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:23 PM
Sep 2012

There's no margin in anti-gay bias anymore. They milked that cow dry.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
4. more like your not asking what I think you should be asking....
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:28 PM
Sep 2012

as in hello gay marriage and especially birth control is tied into the economy. bonk.

lovely Im born in Davenport when we still had a Farmall plant there.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
5. What arrogance - people can vote on whatever issues they choose
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:29 PM
Sep 2012

I can't remember any spouse of candidate being like this.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
25. Set up a shell corporation in the Caymans, then have that company buy the pony ...
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:56 PM
Sep 2012

then you "rent" the pony from your shell corporation.

Then, have the shell corporation write off the cost of maintaining the pony, minus the rather tiny amount of "pony rent" that you pay your shell company.

mojo2012

(290 posts)
9. In other words
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 05:57 PM
Sep 2012

Don't talk to me unless it's about married pro-life women because I don't care about the others.

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
12. She really isn't qualified to speak on any issue. That being said,
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:11 PM
Sep 2012

this election is about a lot more that the economy. She wants to make it about the economy because her husband isn't the incumbent that has had to attempt to clean up the messes of the last republican president. Bush severely damaged the economy and attempted to destroy the middle class. If she doesn't want to talk about social issues and civil liberties, that speaks volumes about where she stands.

Why isn't anybody talking about the Bush era and the fact that he was deliberately trying to destroy the economy, at the expense of the people in the middle.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
18. I was just wondering the same thing today, after having a great Pro-Obama, Anti-Mitt conversation w/
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:41 PM
Sep 2012

a cab driver from Somalia. He is about to get his citizenship and can't wait to be able to vote, but he's very knowledgable on the issues - and very bright. He asked almost as soon as I got in the cab who I was voting for and I said "Obama of course, anybody who votes for Romney is a fool", unless they are obscenly wealthy or extremely stupid.

Anyway we had a great chat and after I got out of the cab, I was wondering, why has nobody ever hammered home the point on how many people have lost their jobs and more due to Romney's sickening pillaging of various corporations. Does anyone believe that he will really create jobs? I don't and I never will.

The last thing he said was that this country is over if Romney won. I heartily agreed. Bright kid.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
28. It's good to hear an immigrant is so passionate about being invovled
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 05:30 AM
Sep 2012

in politics. I'm sure it will be a proud moment when he gets his citizenship and is able to vote.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
32. I suppose this is why R/R wan't to block immigrant voting
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 09:38 AM
Sep 2012

They get it. And they aren't voting Republican

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
29. I disagree, I would bet she's a fairly smart woman
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 05:36 AM
Sep 2012

She probably feels muzzled to a certain degree given who her husband is and their religion. If you think about it, it is pretty sad. People whomever they are, if their gender is male/female, sexual orientation, race, religion, or who they are married to have the right to have their own opinion.

Granted she made the choice to suppress her own rights at some point and has to live with it.

Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

 

elbloggoZY27

(283 posts)
17. Just a No
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:21 PM
Sep 2012

The women of the GOP are just back seat drivers. You would think that somebody in the GOP has about had enough of the RIGHT WINGERS and just admit they have been high jacked by some really awful folks. I can understand another view but not from PLUTO or beyond.

Mr Obama got it right last night when he said that he is the President of the United States.


Start growing up and join the program.

LibGranny

(711 posts)
19. "this election is going to be about the economy and jobs." BECAUSE SHE SAID SO!
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:47 PM
Sep 2012

and the queen has spoken! She's gonna be cutting some people's heads off if they don't quit bugging her!

JohnnyRingo

(18,624 posts)
20. Is she an economist?
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 06:49 PM
Sep 2012

If not, why is she limited to only questions about the economy? Since when are presidential candidates (and their wives) allowed to prescreen their interviewer's questions?

It seems Ms Romney only expects to go on TV to trash Obama. "This isn't about my husband". LOL

patrice

(47,992 posts)
24. Yeah, Ann, whether people can marry or not, or whether they have more children or not
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 09:24 PM
Sep 2012

doesn't have anything to do with how well the economy works.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
30. She talks about the economy, and then claims "I'm here to really just talk about my husband ...
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 06:31 AM
Sep 2012

... and what kind of husband and father he is". No, you lying idiot, when the interviewer gave you the completely open "What is your message to voters?" question, you said nothing about what kind of husband and father Mitt is. You launched straight into the pre-programmed talking points of "a tough economy". You never try to say what kind of husband he is - nothing about how you divide up family decisions or work, nothing whatsoever about your children, nothing about how Mitt relates to you as husband to wife. You just swerve back into "for the economy, Obama is bad, Mitt is good" pap that tells people squat. You're damn lucky the interviewer didn't ask you how the economy would be better under a Romney regime, because you haven't a clue - because he hasn't a fucking clue either.

All you know is that your own taxes will plummet, and your venture capital friends will literally make out like bandits, but without the worry of being arrested, and screw what happens to The Help. That's the message Ann Romney gives - "Mitt will make me even richer, and that's all you peasants need to know. This election is about how to direct more money to the 1%".

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
33. This is so typical.
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:39 AM
Sep 2012

You better get use to the ignorance if these two wing nuts get in there. On the other hand, do you think Michelle would have given the same answer? Hell no. She would have at least discussed it. Rmoney and his wife are in it for the prestige and the money, but mostly the prestige. Michelle is in it for the country. Michelle's speech told me so much more about herself, and Barack. Do we want someone in the white house to protect our ass, or bury our ass? It's quite simple, really.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
35. Dear Ann,
Sat Sep 8, 2012, 11:50 AM
Sep 2012

While the economy is very important to me, the right to control my own body is more important.

Besides, your guy loses on the economy, too.

luv_mykatz

(441 posts)
39. DThe economy and jobs....NOT!
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:16 PM
Sep 2012

rMoney and his wife ARE running their campaign on social issues. Come on, it is freakin' obvious, with their dog whistle statements what they are really trying to do.

Same-old, same-old, from the Repukes, as usual.

Their campaigns are NEVER about improving the economy or creating jobs for the middle and working class. The Repuke play book is about distracting people with false promises about keeping away teh Gays, and maintaining white upper-class power and wealth. The voters who are motivated by this kind of campaigning have been blinded by the corporate owned media, fundy whack job churches, and their own prejudices and fears. In the past, they have not seemed to notice that what the Repukes are REALLY about is MORE MONEY for the Robber Baron elite.

We could try focusing on these benighted voters, see the light bulb of reality lighting up in their heads, helping them to see the truth about how they are being manipulated. Let the mass outing of Repuke scandals increase, let the light of truth shine for all to see.

Let this smilie be what happens for the deluded masses:

And, for all of us who DO get it:

luv_mykatz

(441 posts)
40. Need to add:
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 03:19 PM
Sep 2012

The Repukes are about Oppression: of women, people of color, the poor and middle class, any religion other than fundy whack job, etc., ad nauseum.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
41. When Romney came out against wind subsidies he gave Iowa the final shove to Obama.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:08 PM
Sep 2012

Ann's just making sure it cannot come back.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ann Romney Declines To An...