House approves new Dem rules package
Source: The Hill
The House on Thursday approved a Democratic rules package with just a few defections from progressives despite concerns on the left about the resolution's "pay-as-you-go" provision.
The rules were approved by a largely party-line vote of 234-197. The House will take up two additional portions of the package in coming days.
The architects of the package -- which was unveiled by new Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass) earlier this week -- said it will promote diversity and help fight the deficit.
Under the new rules, lawmakers and House employees are barred from discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. Members and staff are also be permitted to wear religious headgear in the House chamber.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/423780-house-approves-new-dem-rules-package
Three Democrats (Khanna, Gabbard, and Cortez) voted against this rules package and three republicans (Reed, Katko, and Fitzpatrick) voted for it.
The co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) voted for it since they correctly realize that the "Paygo" provision allows it to be waived. It also allows tax increases to pay for programs in lieu of cuts elsewhere.
msongs
(67,395 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)is from PA-1 (old PA-8), which is swing and should have gone to a Democrat if we had ratcheted up turnout a bit more there. In 2006 & 2008, that district as PA-8 (where the old version and newly redrawn version were almost identical) had been Democratic and held by Patrick Murphy, an early Obama supporter.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)What is in there that republicans object to? Bias rules?
rurallib
(62,406 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)I've been following Tom Watson since early in my twitter "career". I like him.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)Just keep chipping away at those unfair tRump tax cuts and the deficit will be back under control again...
Response to PeeJ52 (Reply #6)
George II This message was self-deleted by its author.
'Fiscal Conservative' = eliminating social safety nets while handing tax revenue back to corporations and rich people.
Response to PeeJ52 (Reply #6)
comradebillyboy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Apollyonus
(812 posts)Linda Ed
(493 posts)The U.S. Treasury Department says that the national debt has increased by $2 trillion ($2,000,000,000,000) since President Trump took office on Jan. 20, 2017. That's with Republicans in control of the House and Senate. The national debt is now almost $22 trillion.
Little secret- look at the trends and you will see that Republicans are not and will never be the party of fiscal conservatism.... Period.
The Mouth
(3,148 posts)without showing what year or administration and the point is really made. I have the graphic somewhere around here.
TlalocW
(15,380 posts)Hopefully.
TlalocW
on my old computer- somewhere -
But when you look at a graph, it's interesting; most people wouldn't be able to guess- except the drastic decline after WW2
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)What is her issue now?
slumcamper
(1,606 posts)That said, such an uncompromising stalwart can be an important ally.
She's a bit of an enigma, but I'm thankful she's on our side (most of the time).
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)She was also against HRC as I recall.
Cha
(297,154 posts)The Mouth
(3,148 posts)that under no circumstances can any taxpayer dollars be used to pay any fine or penalty incurred by any elected official.
No free rides, cop or senator, postal carrier or President- you do the infraction, it comes out of your pocket 100 percent
Yeah, I'm dreamin'
TexasTowelie
(112,121 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)Gothmog
(145,130 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)I think Pay Go will kill Medicare for all.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)tax cut bill of 2017. Since the cuts overwhelmingly benefitted those who need them least, it should be a fairly easy sales job to trade affordable, accessible, known-quantity health insurance and healthcare for everyone for raising taxes back up for the very richest Americans and to close corporate tax loopholes.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)Amongst other gop pet projects.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)DoD/military spending way out of control, but both parties are guilty of throwing money at DoD.
Cha
(297,154 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142235742
betsuni
(25,465 posts)Gothmog
(145,130 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)I just wish everyone had throughly read the legislation before voting. But, I'm willing to give the rookies a chance to figure it all out. Legislating isn't easy and there's a lot of reading and learning involved.