Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,843 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 11:05 AM Jan 2019

Supreme Court to weigh New York City curbs on transporting handguns

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday stepped into the divisive issue of gun rights by agreeing to take up a challenge backed by the National Rifle Association to New York City’s strict limits on handgun owners toward transporting their firearms outside of the home.

The nine justices will review a 2018 lower court ruling upholding the city’s restrictions after three gun owners and the NRA’s New York state affiliate sued claiming the regulations violated the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms.”

The case will be heard and decided in the court’s next term, which starts in October and ends in June 2020.

The decision indicates a new interest on the court, where conservatives hold a 5-4 margin, on guns and is the first major gun case to come before the justices since 2010.

-snip-

POLITICS JANUARY 22, 2019 / 9:42 AM / UPDATED 12 MINUTES AGO
Andrew Chung
2 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-guns/supreme-court-to-weigh-new-york-city-curbs-on-transporting-handguns-idUSKCN1PG1QQ

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court to weigh New York City curbs on transporting handguns (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2019 OP
Bigger mass shootings to come after they're done. RandySF Jan 2019 #1
I realy think the solution to our gun problem is dingosatemyusername Jan 2019 #2
Don't ever see that happening hack89 Jan 2019 #3
It wouldn't do either if those things Amishman Jan 2019 #5
thanks, I stand corrected re: fees and inspection n/t dingosatemyusername Jan 2019 #6
We need four more justices. In 2021 it will be time to expand and pack the court. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #4
I think this is a stupid law and should be overturned. MicaelS Jan 2019 #7
2. I realy think the solution to our gun problem is
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 11:41 AM
Jan 2019

moving all semi automatics to the same classification as machine guns, This wouldn't actually take away the gun humpers guns, but it would force them into paying for yearly liscense and make them subject to ATF inspection.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. Don't ever see that happening
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 11:54 AM
Jan 2019

if we can't even pass UBCs then fantasizing about even more draconian steps is a waste of time.

Amishman

(5,554 posts)
5. It wouldn't do either if those things
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 01:06 PM
Jan 2019

Machine gun owners are not subject to annual inspections or annual fees. My brother in law has a few and does not have this (he'd have a fit every year if it happened).

That being said, it still would make them subject to a long wait and a significant tax. Still a decent idea and probably more feasible than an actual ban / forced surrender.

Not overly concerned about the SCOTUS taking up this case, it sounds like an extremely specific challenge to a tiny part of NYC's licensing scheme and transport restrictions. Hard to see this having a wide impact when even the plaintiffs are being very specific

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
7. I think this is a stupid law and should be overturned.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 03:29 PM
Jan 2019

NYC has some of the most draconian gun laws in the US. If they have already issued you a premises license, (NOT a carry permit) and you can transport it unloaded in a range INSIDE city limits, that should be good enough.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court to weigh Ne...