Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 06:40 AM Sep 2012

Taliban fighters wore US Army uniforms in attack on Prince Harry's base

Source: Sunday Telegraph

The night time raid at Camp Bastion caused damage estimated to run to hundreds of millions of dollars, destroyed six American Harrier jets and badly damaged another two.

Details of the assault emerged as six Nato troops, including two British soldiers, were killed in two separate attacks by their Afghan allies in the latest “green on blue” attacks to strike the coalition.

A statement from the insurgents said the attack late on Friday evening on the sprawling Helmand base was in retaliation for an American-made film which insults the prophet Mohammed. Bastion had been chosen because of Prince Harry’s presence, they added.

>

Dressed in United States army uniforms and some in suicide vests, they attacked aircraft on the airfield with automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers.

Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/9545986/Taliban-fighters-wore-US-Army-uniforms-in-attack-on-Prince-Harrys-base.html



Joke headline ; the UK does not claim ownership of Camp Bastion.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MANative

(4,112 posts)
1. Not good.
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:15 AM
Sep 2012

My nephew, a US Marine Captain, is stationed there. Got an email from him sayng that it was "One hell of a fireworks display" but that he was okay. Very scary that these thugs are getting their hands on US uniforms.

James48

(4,433 posts)
5. Bush's fault. Here's why:
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 09:02 AM
Sep 2012

Under Bush & Cheney, much of the support functions that US Soldiers did were outsourced. We USED to have military laundry done by soldiers. Now it is outsourced to local national civilians. Easy now to go to civilian contractor and steal a few uniforms in the laundry.



Food is now done by contractors. Used to be done by soldiers. It's only a matter of time before you read about Aghans poisoning the food. Food, fuel, beans, bullets, showers, laundry. All now at risk, thanks to W. and friends. American soldiers are no longer self-sufficient, so it means there are gaping holes in security and opportunities for evil everywhere. Thanks George.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
8. Yes - and just about everything bad that ever happened in the last...
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 12:09 PM
Sep 2012

ten years is Shrub's fault! (no sarcasm - I mean it!) Completely agree on that count. I thought I had heard something to this effect before, but couldn't remember for sure. I know for certain that it wasn't done that way previously. My late father was in the Army for 27 years, and the only time he ever sent his uniforms out for anything was when his dress blues needed pressing, and that was usually done by the on-base dry cleaner. I always had shoe/boot-polishing duty, and boy, could I do a mean spit-shine!

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
3. Here's another article from the Telegraph that goes along with yours:
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 08:21 AM
Sep 2012

(Great Map of Camp Bastion at the site)


I've been inside Camp Bastion - and it seemed like the safest place on earth
It was supposed to be impregnable – the safest military base in the world. A veritable fortress positioned in the middle of the arid, treeless, empty Helmand desert, isolated but not vulnerable.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/9545508/Ive-been-inside-Camp-Bastion-and-it-seemed-like-the-safest-place-on-earth.html

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. That was quite a hit for NATO to take with loss of aircraft...
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 08:25 AM
Sep 2012

How much longer can the cost of this war not cause a rethink of "project Afghanistan?" With Euro in a recession and the US economy needed to keep getting infusing of money from Bernanke and Fed....how can the money keep coming to replace aircraft and supplies to keep this all going?

Plus, we have the other theaters that we are involved in and the cost of maintaining our presence in those areas which are hardly friendly to us at this point in time.

Crowman1979

(3,844 posts)
7. When they start attacking combat aircraft on the ground then....
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 10:04 AM
Sep 2012

....its time to get the f*** out of there.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
6. We saw use of US uniforms during the Bush admin. Anyone remember?
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 09:04 AM
Sep 2012

I recall it to be a short time period and that the situation also seemed suspicious of incident manufacture.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
11. Could the U.S. actually come up with more U.S. contractors to replace the Afghans,
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 06:54 PM
Sep 2012

or would we need more soldiers?

I remember corresponding with an army cook during the Vietnam war. He was a Spec 4. But those were the days of the draft.

Do those positions even exist in the modern, all-volunteer armed forces?

If we wanted to go back to that time and not use local contractors for security reasons, it would certainly more expensive, but would we have to reinstate the draft to do it?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Taliban fighters wore US ...