I mean, I enjoy the sight of a woman's breasts as much as the next man, but why all the hubbub about Kate's? Taken objectively, they're really not all that impressive. They look as breasts must to be considered breasts. Are "royal" boobs different in some way that we commoners cannot appreciate?

Talk about much ado about not much....

It's about money: selling pictures and magazines.

as nudity has this bigger taboo over here.

Who gives two hoots about the subject?

That was good for a chuckle, KC. Thanks....it's been a shitty day.

Small and kinda saggy. But they're royal boobs. It's not everyday we get to see the Queen's tits. In the olden days we'd be beheaded for that. So it's a bit of a cheap thrill.

Also with Rupert Murdoch around do not assume someone is not listening to your cell phone. Plenty of news out there to illustrate these lessons.

that is out on the Web.

This is too grainy for me.

One couldn't have said it better: You could find better "porn" on Google Maps.

[img][/img]

(sigh) ...voyeurism is even more acceptable in the era of reality TV. What does this really say? --That the Royals sometimes take off their clothes...



I thought the Rmoney peep show was a lot more interesting

Why should Danes who have no internet access be allowed to view the bosoms of the future Queen of England?

if it is sleazy enough to violate kate's privacy like that.

Have these people not learned anything from the tragic death of Diana? I'll answer my own question....no they haven't.

and burn the Danish embassy down. That'll teach 'em!

Who gives a damn about her Tits. She's a public figure.............end of story !!