Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(93,868 posts)
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 07:27 AM Aug 2020

Trump long has relied on nondisclosure deals to prevent criticism. That strategy may be unraveling.

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Washington Post

For decades, Donald Trump has relied on broadly worded nondisclosure agreements as a powerful weapon against anyone who would say something critical of him. Among those who have signed agreements are a porn star, two ex-wives, contestants on “The Apprentice,” campaign workers and business associates.

But this key element of Trump’s corporate and political strategy has shown signs of unraveling, even as his campaign spends heavily to enforce such agreements. He and his allies recently have lost initial rounds in legal battles to stop damaging books by former top White House officials and his niece Mary L. Trump.

Now, in one of the most sweeping efforts by a former associate to undo nondisclosure agreements, the Trump campaign’s former Hispanic outreach director last week filed her latest effort in a class-action suit to void all such campaign contracts. She says they are so broad that they deny individuals their First Amendment right to say anything critical of the president — even as he routinely takes to Twitter to mock and deride his critics.

In a motion for summary judgment in the case, the former campaign worker, Jessica Denson, said the campaign sought a $1.5 million claim against her for violating an NDA. She said that came after she filed a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination by campaign officials. (That separate case is ongoing.)



Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-nda-jessica-denson-lawsuit/2020/08/06/202fed1c-d5ad-11ea-b9b2-1ea733b97910_story.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
1. so since trump loves executive orders, whats stops Biden from outlawing NDAs by executive order?
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 07:43 AM
Aug 2020

and make all NDA's now illegal and must be disclosed?

brooklynite

(93,868 posts)
2. The fact that they have nothing to do with the Executive Branch of the Government?
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 07:47 AM
Aug 2020

KPN

(15,587 posts)
6. But they obviously do if the pResident of the US uses them routinely.
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 10:13 AM
Aug 2020
Oops, thought I clicked the sarcasm emoji.

Yeah, this is a matter better handled by the courts and/or legislation ... if at all. Though I do think elected officials should be prohibited from the use of NDAs related to administering the duties for which they are elected, including regarding any elected official activity, conduct, behavior, etc., that has a logical nexus.

brooklynite

(93,868 posts)
7. You miss my point. Executive Orders can only APPLY to Executive Branch policies.
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 10:14 AM
Aug 2020

NDAs have been previously determined to be unenforceable in the Government. The lawsuit in question regards a private NDA.

KPN

(15,587 posts)
8. Haha. I was typing edit at the very time you were. I agree with your point.
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 10:19 AM
Aug 2020

The Mouth

(3,123 posts)
3. It would be a good thing to completely get rid of NDA's
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 09:16 AM
Aug 2020

change my mind.

More harm than good; for every trade secret there are 10 exploited women or victimized employees who have to keep quiet.

Rule 'em unconstitutional I say.

tinrobot

(10,848 posts)
4. The bigger issue is using the legal system punitively to enforce bad NDAs.
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 09:57 AM
Aug 2020

Many of those "NDA"s are already unenforceable. You can't NDA criminal behavior, including harassment and bad employment practices.

The real problem is trying to bankrupt victims by hiring expensive lawyers. Perhaps we need to put people in jail for attacking others with frivolous lawsuits. Or maybe disbar a few lawyers for engaging in those sorts of attacks.

The NDAs aren't necessarily the problem. It's the lawyers.

Wounded Bear

(58,440 posts)
5. "The NDAs aren't necessarily the problem. It's the lawyers."
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 10:12 AM
Aug 2020

It's both. Trump is a prime example of exploiting legal services and the justice department for personal gain.

 

Illumination

(2,458 posts)
9. That's great news on nondisclosure agreements! Like "Weekend @ Bernie's"...
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 10:28 AM
Aug 2020

Stop propping up someone who is useless!

JudyM

(29,122 posts)
10. Locking
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 11:37 AM
Aug 2020

After review by forum hosts, for being analysis rather than important breaking news. Please repost in GD, though, if you’d like!

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump long has relied on ...