Seems kind of ambiguous, not explicit enough.

If he can claim cyber harassment, what about all the pResident's tweets? Even Fauci has had to hire security for his family. So many ordinary citizens have had their lives ruined by people on the right. What is so special about this policeman? And what is it with how afraid they are? They're there to terrify citizens - we shouldn't protect their anonymity

I think this case if really important because their ability to continue to convince people to join paramilitary groups and attack Americans on the streets DEPENDS on them acting without consequences to themselves and their families. They removed their names, now they want to punish people for naming them.

I wonder if tweets read "If anyone knows who this is, I'd like to sit down and have a peaceful conversation with him" if they could claim fear of harm then.

According to the article: "Peyrouton, Sziszak’s lawyer, said he suspects that prosecutors are going after the five co-defendants because they are concerned about police officers being doxed online." The officer had placed tape over his badge number, you know, the way we would normally ID the officer, and was wearing a mask. Do citizens have a right to know who the police are that are acting for, with, or against them? Seems to be another step in the direction of secret police acting to suppress constitutionally protected dissent.

Through proper badge wearing, showing those he was confronting who he was, this would not be in question

We have completely gone off the rails with anonymous officers...

Harassed, doxxed, etc. They are notorious for refusing to especially help women.