Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,378 posts)
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 12:48 PM Sep 2020

China says no need to vaccinate entire population against Covid-19 at this stage, only frontline wor

Source: CNN

(CNN)Not everyone in China will need to get vaccinated against Covid-19, according to the country's top medical official, as Beijing looks to prioritize frontline workers and high-risk populations in a move that underscores rising confidence among policy-makers of their ability to contain the virus.

"Since the first wave of Covid-19 appeared in Wuhan, China has already survived the impact of Covid-19 several times," Gao Fu, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said at a vaccine summit in the city of Shenzhen on Saturday, according to state-run news agency China News Service.

The question of vaccinating the public was one of balancing "risks and benefits," he added, pointing to factors like cost and potential side effects. There isn't currently a need for mass vaccination at this stage -- though that could change if another serious outbreak takes place, Gao said.

The policy marks China apart from many Western governments, most notably Australia, that have outlined plans to introduce mass public vaccination drives.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/14/asia/china-covid-vaccine-gao-fu-intl-hnk/index.html



Given China's population and density, it is surprising that China is only planning a limited roll out of its early vaccines to frontline health care workers. You would think that if there is an outbreak that it would tougher to lock things down.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

efhmc

(14,709 posts)
1. Here we will skip the front line workers and go straight for the white middle class to
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 12:51 PM
Sep 2020

help the GOP.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,283 posts)
7. We will vaccinate the most critical and necessary workers.
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 04:36 PM
Sep 2020

NFL, NBA, MLB.

Then, secondary tier of necessary workers. Big Ten, Big Eight, etc.

Warpy

(110,913 posts)
2. Most likely, they'll do it in stages
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 12:58 PM
Sep 2020

Health care workers here always got the first batch of flu vaccine, usually in September.

TomCADem

(17,378 posts)
6. 5 lessons on social distancing from the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 04:07 PM
Sep 2020

There is no reason why the U.S. can't get back to a relative normal without a vaccine. Canada, Taiwan and Germany have done relatively well even without imposing a draconian lockdown like China did. Also, even without vaccines and modern medicine, the U.S. was able to overcome the Spanish Flu in in the early 1900s through social distancing and masks. Of course, when you have a President who is only focused on his own safety, then hundreds of thousands of people will die despite the advances in medicine since the early 1900s.



https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/24/21188121/coronavirus-covid-19-social-distancing-1918-spanish-flu

Over the next few weeks, at least, Americans are being asked to stay home. Schools and restaurants are closing down. Public events and larger gatherings are getting canceled, if not banned. People are advised to not even have friends over. All of this amounts to a huge disruption in American life.

But it’s not the first time the US has done this.

Back in 1918, a strain of influenza — colloquially called the “Spanish flu” — caused the worst pandemic in centuries, killing as many as 100 million people. In the US, about 675,000 people died.

In response, states and cities across the country told people to do what we now know as social distancing. Schools, restaurants, and businesses were closed. Public gatherings were banned. People were told to isolate and quarantine. In some places, this lasted for months.

It worked. Things didn’t go perfectly — far from it, as some cities fared much worse than others, and people didn’t always obey what experts and officials were telling them. But studies show that the social distancing efforts helped slow the spread of the 1918 flu and reduce the mortality rate overall.

OneCrazyDiamond

(2,029 posts)
10. Gov Newsom is in charge of that decision for my state.
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 11:07 AM
Sep 2020

He has said repeatedly we need a vaccine. 1/3rd of our country vitriolically refuse to even acknowledge this exists, and I think he is factoring that in his calculus.

TomCADem

(17,378 posts)
11. It Is Sad That We Need to Accept Trumpsters....
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 11:59 AM
Sep 2020

...who refuse to wear masks or socially distance. On top of that, you have the President and Attorney General continuing to turn social distancing into a culture war issue.

So, Newsome may be correct that we will ultimately need a vaccine, because so many folks have bought into Trump's talking points.

patphil

(6,035 posts)
4. I think this approach is more a reality check on the massive task of vaccinating 1.4 billion people.
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 02:10 PM
Sep 2020

High risk people and areas first, then spread out as needed across the country.

We can't use the same approach in the USA because the virus is too widespread. It's literally everywhere right now. We'll still probably go with high risk people first, but then there is so much of it out there that we will probably just make it available generally across the country.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,750 posts)
5. That's a sensible way to do it.
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 03:46 PM
Sep 2020

It's how it should be handled in this country also.

Although it probably won't be.

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
12. Is there any other way to do it? There are production constraints that rate limit availability
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 01:56 PM
Sep 2020

It only makes sense that those who are most exposed and most at risk would get it first.

I suppose in this case, the authoritarian nature of the Chinese government makes it easier to get things done, but they still have a lot of people to deal with. (Not promoting authoritarianism, btw)

Nitram

(22,671 posts)
8. Given the fact that manufacturing a vaccine takes time, and the fact that people who
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 07:13 PM
Sep 2020

are practicing social distancing and wear a mask in public are not directly exposed to the virus, I agree with China. Start with medical personnel, supermarket workers, and the like. Teachers and children attending school as well. People like me - retired, living on two acres of land, and no need to go out except for groceries - can be inoculated later.

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
13. In cases like yours, I wouldn't want to be one of the first people even if I could
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 01:59 PM
Sep 2020

I'd rather wait it out a little bit to see how it plays out. It's not that I am anti-vaccine in the least bit, but it's just how quickly everyone is trying to develop one.. Not much different than being leery of moving into a house that was built in half a day.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»China says no need to vac...