Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,839 posts)
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 07:15 PM Sep 2020

Ohio judge derides restriction of 1 ballot box per county

Source: AP

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A directive that restricted Ohio counties to one ballot drop box in November was arbitrary and unreasonable, a county judge ruled Tuesday, delivering the Republican secretary of state in the presidential battleground another in a series of blows to his policies.

The office of Secretary of State Frank LaRose said he would soon appeal the decision by Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Richard Frye, assuming the judge follows through and invalidates the secretary's drop-box order.

For now, Frye's ruling doesn't change anything, LaRose spokesperson Maggie Sheehan said in a written statement, "and the Secretary’s directive remains in place.”

Access to ballot drop boxes has become an urgent matter nationally, with in-person voting options restricted by the coronavirus pandemic and the efficiency and security of mail-in voting questioned amid cutbacks at the U.S. Postal Service.



Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ohio-judge-derides-restriction-of-1-ballot-box-per-county/ar-BB194AeQ?li=BBnb7Kz

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio judge derides restriction of 1 ballot box per county (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2020 OP
"arbitrary and unreasonable" JohnnyRingo Sep 2020 #1
Oh yes there IS an advantage ...... to GOPers who want to suppress voters. groundloop Sep 2020 #3
Oh look, the republican SOS of Ohio is another arrogant dumbass thenelm1 Sep 2020 #2
If they thought it was advantageous to repubs, they would be in every 7-11. keithbvadu2 Sep 2020 #4

JohnnyRingo

(18,623 posts)
1. "arbitrary and unreasonable"
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 08:23 PM
Sep 2020

That says it all. There's no advantage to doing it, and it's a number they picked out of thin air.

Everyone else knows why the GOP wants to restrict ballot boxes.

groundloop

(11,517 posts)
3. Oh yes there IS an advantage ...... to GOPers who want to suppress voters.
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 09:19 PM
Sep 2020

That order is total bullshit, and without a doubt they'd put drop boxes where they're more accessible to right wing voters.

It's just so damned pathetic that GOPers are resorting to such blatant voter suppression to hold power. Once again they're showing that the only way they can win is to cheat.

thenelm1

(852 posts)
2. Oh look, the republican SOS of Ohio is another arrogant dumbass
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 08:30 PM
Sep 2020

Why do all these shitheads insist on trying to keep legal citizens from voting? (rhetorical question - I know the answer. He's a republican shithead. And has no earthly reason to hold his office other than the fact that he's a shithead.)

keithbvadu2

(36,724 posts)
4. If they thought it was advantageous to repubs, they would be in every 7-11.
Tue Sep 15, 2020, 09:39 PM
Sep 2020

If they thought it was advantageous to repubs, they would be in every 7-11.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ohio judge derides restri...