Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 08:23 PM Jun 2014

EPA to Seek 30% Cut in Emissions at Power Plants

Source: Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON--The Environmental Protection Agency will propose mandating power plants cut U.S. carbon-dioxide emissions 30% by 2030 from levels of 25 years earlier, according to people briefed on the rule, an ambitious target that marks the first-ever attempt at limiting such pollution.

The rule-making proposal, to be unveiled Monday, sets in motion the main piece of President Barack Obama's climate-change agenda and is designed to give states and power companies flexibility in reaching the target. But it also will face political resistance and become fodder in midterm congressional races, particularly in energy-producing states, and is destined to trigger lawsuits from states and industry that oppose it.

The rule would affect hundreds of fossil-fuel power plants--hitting the nation's roughly 600 coal-fired plants the hardest. The carbon framework seeks to strike a balance between what environmentalists want--an ambitious overall target--with what the utility industry wants--flexibility, a long compliance timeline and an earlier base-year calculation from which to meet the goal. Carbon emissions have dropped since 2005, making the overall reduction smaller when compared with recent years.

For the president, the rule is a major element of his attempt to secure a second-term legacy. While Mr. Obama is expected to remain out of the spotlight when the EPA unveils the rule Monday, he plans to join a conference call with the American Lung Association, casting the rule as needed to protect public health as well as to reduce the carbon emissions that scientists say contribute to climate change.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20140601-701982.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
2. Dept of Defense is already behind a big push for solar.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014

They are the largest consumers of energy on the planet, so I believe they have some small influence...

pediatricmedic

(397 posts)
5. If renewable energy continues growing at the current pace, that should be easily achievable
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:51 PM
Jun 2014

I would even say blocking all new construction of coal plants after 2016 would be good. Offer incentives(they understand money) to refit or even shut down existing coal plants as well.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
6. I don't believe there is a valid reason to give coal money to go away.
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 03:02 AM
Jun 2014

They've stood on lowest cost economics as the justification for their existence long past the time they should have been shut down for health/safety/environmental reasons; so why, now that they are finally being pushed out by their renewable competitors, should we pay them to go away?

Renewables do not have the negative externalities that the coal companies have - it's time for that free ride to end. With this policy the coal generation arm is being given the opportunity to address the social responsibility aspect of their existence that they've heretofore managed to avoid.

If they can make progress on the issue of carbon pollution and do it at a competitive cost, then they can stay in business.

If they can not, they deserve even less support than the near zero they allowed to trickle into renewables though the last several decades.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
7. Anyone who says Democrats are the same as Republicans has LOST THEIR FUCKING MIND!
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 09:17 PM
Jun 2014

Reason # 462,874

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EPA to Seek 30% Cut in Em...