Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,060 posts)
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 06:53 PM Jun 2014

Court: Company didn't induce patent infringement

Source: AP-Excite

WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that a company is not liable for inducing patent infringement if someone other than the company carries out some of the steps leading to infringement.

The justices unanimously ruled Monday that Internet content delivery company Limelight Networks Inc. did not infringe on the patented system for managing images and video owned by rival Akamai Technologies Inc.

Akamai claimed Limelight used some of its patented methods for speeding content delivery, and then illegally encouraged its customers to carry out the remaining steps. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed, but the Supreme Court reversed.

Justice Samuel Alito said all the steps for patent infringement must be performed by a single party. Since there was no direct infringement, Alito said there could be no inducement.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140602/supreme-court-patents-9a1bb930af.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court: Company didn't induce patent infringement (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jun 2014 OP
Back to claim drafting 101... Ms. Toad Jun 2014 #1
sounds like they went by the book tomm2thumbs Jun 2014 #2

Ms. Toad

(33,915 posts)
1. Back to claim drafting 101...
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 07:10 PM
Jun 2014

Either that or legislation 101.

It means that if you are a legitimate business (I don't care about trolls), your competitors can much more easily use your invention without infringing by shifting the performance of some of the elements to a customer or an independent third party.

Most of it can be fixed by careful claim drafting, but that won't save the patents in the pipeline now...

On the other hand, it will make some legitimate companies very happy at the thought of a new tool (actually an old one revived) to bash trolls about the head with.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
2. sounds like they went by the book
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 12:07 AM
Jun 2014

wondering if they'll go after the customers who infringed now... or if they even could manage that

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court: Company didn't ind...