Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 10:49 AM Jun 2014

Europe's ageing nuclear reactors must have an environmental assessment

Source: Greenpeace

World Environment Day today was important for European nuclear energy policy, and the triggering issue was in Ukraine. No, it was not because of the G7 meeting talking about the consequences of energy dependence in the shadow of the political problems in Ukraine. The G7 did not really address nuclear, because they are aware nuclear cannot really help them out and the risks of nuclear power in conflict areas are not a strong issue on their agenda.

The important issue was a decision of the Meeting of Parties of the Convention (MoP) on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, also known as the Espoo Convention [1]. Such meetings are normally rather boring with occasional pearls at side-event and seminars. This time there was a lot of heated discussion on the lifetime extension of the Rivne 1 and 2 nuclear reactors in Ukraine.

In the end, the MoP endorsed the conclusions of its Implementation Commission [2]. As a result, all ageing nuclear power stations in Europe will have to be submitted to an environmental impact assessment before a licence renewal or the approval of a 10-year-periodic safety review.

This is a groundbreaking decision. Until now, most European countries prolonged the lifetimes of their ageing nuclear reactors by only looking at whether prescribed safety standards are met. Normally, there is no further consideration about whether the increasing risk of potential large environmental impacts due to a severe accident at an ageing power station can be justified in comparison with other alternatives for generating electricity. The public is not consulted before old reactors receive another lease on life. This now has to change.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/europes-ageing-nuclear-reactors-must-have-an-/blog/49545/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Europe's ageing nuclear reactors must have an environmental assessment (Original Post) bananas Jun 2014 OP
60 reactors will have to undergo an assessment in the coming 3 years. bananas Jun 2014 #1
It takes a long time to shut one down too. OneCrazyDiamond Jun 2014 #3
Mmmm they had also better worry about the effects of rising sea levels on the reactors. nt cstanleytech Jun 2014 #2
They don't need them anyway. DeSwiss Jun 2014 #4
+1 nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #5
The great clean Germany lie. Union Scribe Jun 2014 #6
Governments ^ almost never do anything worthwhile on their own. :-/ n/t DeSwiss Jun 2014 #7

bananas

(27,509 posts)
1. 60 reactors will have to undergo an assessment in the coming 3 years.
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 10:52 AM
Jun 2014

A little more from the article:

With this MoP decision, 60 ageing nuclear reactors in Europe will have to undergo an environmental assessment in the coming three years [4].

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
4. They don't need them anyway.
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jun 2014
Germany Quadruples Energy Surplus Over the Last Two Years

For a country phasing out its nuclear plants, you might expect a downturn in energy production. But Germany has actually seen its power output quadruple between 2011 and 2012. Europe’s leading economy has been pushing for a green revolution, becoming one of the largest markets for solar voltaics and where support for renewables is subsidized by taxpayers. The country’s Federal Statistics Office reported a surplus of 22.8 billion kilowatt hours over the last two years. The government has set a goal to source 80 percent of its electricity from green technology by 2050, leaving the old fossil fuel-based utilities behind. Holland, Austria and Switzerland were the country’s main customers for the extra energy.

Read more: http://inhabitat.com/germany-quadruples-energy-surplus-over-the-last-two-years/




http://www.radiationnetwork.com/Europe.htm

- K&R

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
6. The great clean Germany lie.
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 10:46 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-26820405

Until the carbon price rises, then, lignite is set to remain at the heart of German energy production.

"This is one of the biggest inconsistencies of the energy transition, and if the government wanted to address it, it could," says Prof Hey.

"To address this paradox, the government needs to adopt a regulatory approach on coal. It is relying on the market, rather than regulation, and this is key to the problem."

Or as Prof Kemfert puts it: "The government isn't doing anything."

In fact, the new coalition has said that all fossil fuel power sources are equally important for the security of supply for the foreseeable future.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Europe's ageing nuclear r...