Billions at risk as West Coast port contract ends
Source: AP-Excite
By JUSTIN PRITCHARD
LOS ANGELES (AP) The West Coast ports that are America's gateway for hundreds of billions of dollars of trade with Asia and beyond are no stranger to labor unrest and even violence.
Now, the contract that covers nearly 20,000 dockworkers is set to expire, and businesses that trade in everything from apples to iPhones are worried about disruptions just as the crush of cargo for the back-to-school and holiday seasons begins.
With contentious issues including benefits and job security on the table, smooth sailing is no guarantee.
On one side is the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, with its tradition of fierce activism dating to the Great Depression, when two of its members were killed during a strike. On the other is the Pacific Maritime Association, which represents shipping lines and operators of terminals at 29 West Coast ports.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140622/us-port-labor-7084b7772a.html
FILE - In this Jan.10, 2011 file photo, shipping containers line the Port of Long Beach in Long Beach, Calif. The West Coast ports that are America{2019}s gateway for hundreds of billions of dollars of trade with Asia and beyond are no stranger to labor unrest and even violence. Now, the contract that covers nearly 20,000 dockworkers is set to expire, and businesses that trade in everything from apples to iPhones are worried about disruptions _ as the summer cargo crush begins. (AP Photo/Noaki Schwartz)
cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)coming to an agreement.
Owl
(3,639 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)Compared to the company CEO they work for, how well are they paid?
cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)Pacific Maritime Association, which represents shipping lines and operators of terminals at 29 West Coast ports.
That is who they are in negotiations with.
cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)to make the same as the chairman of Evergreen Shipping.
I personally have known a few dockworkers and none have any complaints at all about the pay or the job. Unless it's at contract time.
And while the dangers are similar to those of any construction job, automated container cranes are nothing like the old days of breakbulk.
It's not the '30s any more and the what's on the waterfront isn't a movie.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)I'm sure the suits make much, much more. Should they?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Also the hours are terrible and many of the things they do expose them to the elements. It's very tough work and they deserve to be paid very well.
It's also essential that they get excellent health care benefits and retirement, because as I said it's dangerous work and there are frequent injuries.
The unfortunate reality is that there's a cycle of injury/illegal firing/ suing to get one's job back that's very common in the industry, and it makes it very difficult for people to keep their heads above water, even with union protection.
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)As a retired airline pilot, I could only have wished to make the money and had the time off the press said I did whenever contract negotiations rolled around. The MSM is not the worker's friend.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)The MSM is just a corporate mouthpiece and even frame that reporting via a corporatist view.
I've seen so many time over the decades they'll either quote inflated figures of hourly pay for the rank and file by including overtime and benefits ( while studiously ignoring management benefits and stock options in an attempt to make their compensation appear lower ) or they'll ignore ignore negative key provisions for any pay increases. ( a pay hike but creating a "B scale" of a lower paid group, or rule changes that will cut headcount, or cuts in other areas.
Another thing they'll do is quote any pay hike offered in isolation of past events; such as a 2 or 3 percent raise following previous concessions of 10 or 20 percent or more.
All designed to keep one half of the working class to resent the other, and by extension, barking up any other tree than that the plutocracy has climbed. It seems to play right into corporatists hands as so many fall for it.
Devious bastards, the lot of them.
PSPS
(13,579 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)coming up, media broadcasts the overpaid longshoreman meme. It isn't true because longshoremen are not guaranteed work every day. That depends on what's at the dock and what the labor rotation is. During one strike, when I was a kid, and times were tough, my father said that he put his life on the line every day unloading ships, just like he had in the Pacific for 4 years during WWII and that he expected to make a good enough living to own a home, a car, take a vacation, provide health care for his family and send his kids to college. The ILWU is what industrial labor unions were designed to be. It should be the model for all working people everywhere.
Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Note that the focus is on businesses losing money instead of on workers' rights.
People who read these articles have grown so used to the bias that most don't even realize the extent to which they are being manipulated.
Coincidentally, 80 years ago, the Pacific Coast witnessed one helluva a strike.
The Pacific District ILAs Strike of 1934 began on the morning of May 9th when over 12,000 longshoremen struck from Bellingham, Washington in the north, to the port of San Diego, California in the south. According to Jonathan Dembo, only 75 longshoremen along the entire Pacific Coast crossed strike picket lines. With such unity among the longshoremen, the employers mainly concentrated their tactics on keeping the larger ports of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Portland open through the use of scab labor or by force. Striking longshoremen in sixteen smaller ports, by contrast, succeeded in keeping their waterfronts closed down for the duration of the strike. http://depts.washington.edu/dock/34strikehistory_part2.shtml
But then, I'm sure we all learned about it in history class.
Picture taken in San Francisco on Market St. during the funeral procession for the killed longshoremen
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)"my favorite commie"
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)What's interesting about the era is that there were lots of Communists in the labor movement. (Bridges in SF, the Dunne brothers in the Teamsters strike in Minneapolis, Louis Budenz and company in the Toledo Auto-Lite strike.) Most of the rank and file weren't Communists and they had no illusions about the politics of some of their leaders. They knew that some of their key leaders were Communists. Yet they respected them for the way they organized and stood up for the rights of workers.
It's kind of a pity (although somewhat understandable) the way the modern labor movement tends to sanitize its own history. The truth is that some of the most effective strikes were driven by the locals and called in open defiance of the cautions of the national unions
C Moon
(12,209 posts)There are great things to seejust beyond the shipping docks...
It's an area of San Pedro, CA that has a lot of potential. They are trying to build it up, but it's slow going.
Visit sometime! It's at the end of the 110 freeway.
There is an amazing marina (Cabrillo marina...we walk our pup there all the time), and Cabrillo beach (a man made beach, with an awesome jetty (that we named our dog after) and it's etched by high cliffs that will lead you to Point Ferminwhere there's a lighthouse and a beautiful park (each summer in the evening they have Shakespeare in the park). There's so much to see in this area. I just LOVE it!!!!
Sorry for the side notes. But seeing the area in the news always gets me going. San Pedro is amazing, and if you ask me, the port is the ugly weak spotalthough, I know it's the money driver.
Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)NOW U say something.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)propaganda from Fox, Limpballs, Savage, and the rest of the MSM have weakened unions terribly. I live around many of the world's largest refineries on the Texas Gulf coast, union membership is way down and most of these idiots vote Republican because "Democrats want to take my guns." Union leadership has trouble getting them to meetings, paying dues, electing candidates... They are not willing to sacrifice much for the unions and union leadership is aging and increasingly out of touch.
Plants like BP Texas City, which blew up killing 15 and injuring thousands in 2005, are run on the cheap and way more dangerous than they already were from the nature of the activity and the union was powerless to stop it. The jobs pay well and the plants keep them in fear that they will lose it all and go non-union if they rock the boat.