People with guns don't kill cops, people who wear diapers wear cops. It all Depends on who you are lobbying for.

n/t

as they were incompetent in life. Multiple firearms. Access to an ammo horde. Only killed 3 persons other than themselves, and had to fire multiple rounds to do that.

The shooters' cause? That couple were nuttier than a squirrel's nest.

...mere diarrhea is no deterrent.

This is the future we've all been waiting for?

But quickly saw they were in over their heads. So the whole event didn't take long.

He drew his weapon on the man, but didnt know the wife was behind him. She killed him.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/264154081.html#ZJcXOhZ53cFdcc3i.97

I guess wearing diapers means they probably thought they would be around for a lot longer.

If so, could this be the next trend in mass shootings?
Head to Walmart to find abundant ammo and lots of innocents to victimize.


Ack!
A quick search and I've found a blog that chronicles Walmart shootings...
http://walmartshootings.blogspot.com/p/running-list-of-2014-walmart-shootings.html

In some States they can "open carry" their weapons into the store in full view with no one to stop them, walk up to the ammo department and then demand all their goods.

Man's obviously about to go on a rampage.

Probably thought that if they did, they would reduce the stops that they take, and fling those things at police cars in pursuit.

hours, with backpacks/guns and must have been 'ready' for their final deed to start. diapers?

Guess their personal 'Fantasy mass murder-siege' didn't include him being shot early & the early suicides.

He was a convicted Felon and also subject to home confinement and monitored parole. No guns are allowed. Why didn't the people associated with his parole terms make sure the woman he lived with, his wife- didn't own or buy guns? The authorities monitored him by computer, why didn't they monitor his computer use? He would have lost his parole over the online statements he made, the statements he made to neighbors or the gun access

We have to prioritize. Do you realize how many anti-war activists and environmentalists there are to keep tabs on??

They did a bit like that on THE SHIELD once, where they flushed out a killer by saying evidence at the crime scene indicated he was an impotent bedwetter or something like that.

Have the cops investigated Vitter yet as he may have been the ring leader?

The article states they were carrying handguns and a shotgun. The only ammo capable of piercing police vests are rifle cartridges, however, as even top-of-the-line 9mm ammo cannot beat Kevlar.

I wonder if they brought along some 5.56mm ammo, or grabbed some from Walmart, on the assumption they would take the AR-15's from the officer's car, or find one in Walmart?

I've not seen them, and don't know how easy they are to get

But maybe they were talking about these:

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_16/522352_.html

Steel-core rifle ammo is still OK, I believe. But even if that were banned as well, an old-fashioned lead-and-copper rifle round will still penetrate body armor; it's just the fact it's going so damn fast more than the bullet's construction.