Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 07:36 AM Jun 2014

Hacking trial: Brooks cleared of charges, Coulson guilty

Source: BBC

Ex-News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks has been cleared of all charges in the phone-hacking trial.

Former News of the World editor Andy Coulson was found guilty at the Old Bailey of conspiring to hack phones.

The jury found Mrs Brooks not guilty of conspiracy to hack voicemails, two counts of conspiracy to pay public officials and two counts of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
...
Ms Carter was cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, as was Charlie Brooks and News International's former head of security Mark Hanna.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27997688



I'm surprised at the not guilty verdicts for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - it looked to me pretty sure they had done something to cover up evidence, even if it couldn't be shown what the evidence was.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hacking trial: Brooks cleared of charges, Coulson guilty (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 OP
Here is the link for the Guardian story davidpdx Jun 2014 #1
even if it couldn't be shown what the evidence was..... dipsydoodle Jun 2014 #2
The U.S. system has devolved into a trial by prosecutors Kelvin Mace Jun 2014 #3
And that's the truth. 1monster Jun 2014 #5
Cameron apologises over Andy Coulson appointment muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #4
Scotland Yard want to inverview Rupert Murdoch about hacking muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #6
This Verdict Not Justice billhicks76 Jun 2014 #7
12 jurors. dipsydoodle Jun 2014 #8
You were there and saw all the evidence? If not, your comment is uncalled for. DU isn't intended 24601 Jun 2014 #10
Well, at least they got Coulson. Highly embarrassing to the government. LeftishBrit Jun 2014 #9

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. even if it couldn't be shown what the evidence was.....
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 08:59 AM
Jun 2014

Our system is based on admissible evidence presented and not trial by media as seems to be the case in the US at times.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. The U.S. system has devolved into a trial by prosecutors
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:28 AM
Jun 2014

and police who try their case in the media by leaking selective information to taint the jury pools. Then when they get the public worked up against the defendant to the point of a lynch mob, the DA "graciously" offers to cut a deal so they can score an easy conviction and advance their political careers. If you refuse the deal, may gawd have mercy on your soul, because the DA and police will pull out all the stops to convict you, regardless of the evidence.

Or at least, that is how it seems to me for those of us who cannot afford a top-notch lawyer. If you have enough money, almost anything, up to an including murder, is allowed.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
5. And that's the truth.
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 02:39 PM
Jun 2014

Unfortunatley. And the Public Defenders play right along with the prosecutors, which is why so many mentally incompetent and developmentally delayed people are sitting in prisons with sentences far longer than those of people with more normal metal processing.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
4. Cameron apologises over Andy Coulson appointment
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 09:42 AM
Jun 2014
Prime Minister David Cameron has apologised for employing Andy Coulson as his director of communications.

"I am extremely sorry I employed him. It was the wrong decision," he said.

"I gave someone a second chance and it turned out to be a bad decision."
...
Asked what checks he had made before employing Coulson, he said: "I asked him questions, if he knew about phone hacking, and he said he didn't and I accepted those assurances and I gave him the job.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27998411


Trying to spin it as being nice and trusting, and hoping he can 'draw a line under it', I think.

24601

(3,959 posts)
10. You were there and saw all the evidence? If not, your comment is uncalled for. DU isn't intended
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 08:46 PM
Jun 2014

as the prosecutors' cheering section.

To side with the state, take a right turn and go down the hall.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hacking trial: Brooks cle...