Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Voting machines are among the least reliable devices on this planet.” (Original Post) Baobab Mar 2016 OP
DRE Reliability: Failure by Design? Wilms Mar 2016 #1
That's a fact. Why is nothing done about it? nt ladjf Mar 2016 #2
It's a gentleman's agrrement among those already in power. They won't squawk about tblue37 Mar 2016 #3
That is exactly the correct answer. ladjf Mar 2016 #4
In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our votes and voting rights. Scuba Mar 2016 #5
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
1. DRE Reliability: Failure by Design?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:30 PM
Mar 2016
DRE Reliability: Failure by Design?

By Howard Stanislevic, Research Consultant, VoteTrustUSA E-Voter Education Project

Abstract – The Election Assistance Commission’s Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG) are developed by a Technical Guidelines Development Committee that includes participation by the International Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) – a 375,000-member non-profit professional organization whose code of ethics states that its members shall “accept responsibility in making engineering decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public.” We show herein that the VVSG Reliability standard for e-voting systems, expressed as a Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) of only 163 hours, is woefully inadequate, resulting in voting systems of lower reliability than mechanical lever voting machines in use for over 40 years. This standard allows 9.2% of all e-voting systems to fail in any 15-hour Election Day, and a much higher failure rate during the extended “Early Voting” periods now being implemented in many states.

snip

In other words, the number of failed DREs allowed (F) is equal to the number of hours in the Election Day multiplied by the number of DREs in the jurisdiction, divided by the MTBF of 163 hours. With this MTBF, the failure rate allowed during any 15-hour period (F / N x 100) will always equal 9.2% or one out of every 11 DREs.

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1057&Itemid=26

tblue37

(65,218 posts)
3. It's a gentleman's agrrement among those already in power. They won't squawk about
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 12:48 AM
Mar 2016

the riggable machines as long as their *own* office is unchallenged.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
5. In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our votes and voting rights.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 11:15 AM
Mar 2016

But they didn't bother. Hmmmmm.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»“Voting machines are amon...