Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 08:38 PM Aug 2016

This Is Democracy?

Rcooley123's Blog

This Is Democracy?

Over the past few years, there have been some disturbing trends in the functioning of our government. The Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case opened up campaign financing to unlimited large sums of “dark money” via anonymous contributors to political action committees that are supposedly not aligned with any individual candidate’s campaign. Corporations are deemed to have the rights of people and money deemed speech protected by the First Amendment. Rather than “one person, one vote” politics have become more a case of “one dollar, one vote”, as corporations and the wealthy are now much more able to make their voices heard during the campaign season. All previous attempts at reigning in campaign spending have been rendered meaningless and now often the amount of money a person can spend or raise becomes more significant than the ideas and policy positions individual candidates seek to bring forth.

More and more activity is taking place at the state, local and federal levels to disenfranchise voters. There seems to be a definite trend to reduce, rather than increase, the number of people with an effective voice in the politics which shape all of our lives as Americans. The Supreme Court chimed in once again earlier this year by striking down an important section in the Voting Rights Act that has led to increasing attempts by legislatures in many states to further restrict eligible voters by requiring voter ID’s, for instance. Much of the resistance to immigration reform is aimed at preventing millions of people living and working in this country from ever gaining citizenship because that would enable them to vote and have a voice in the selection of those writing the laws under which they live. Exploiting the labor of these people, many of whom are paid substandard wages because they cannot complain of mistreatment for fear of deportation, runs contrary to our sense of fairness. Denying them full political participation in the government to which they pay taxes and under which they have lived for years or even decades, is immoral and undemocratic, in my view.

Political gamesmanship aimed only at retaining power for a small minority in this country seems to have become the main aim of many in government. The US House of Representatives does not represent the US citizenry by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn’t even represent the will of the electorate as expressed in the 2012 election. A recent poll showed a Congressional public approval rating of 12% – an all-time low. Only extreme legislative redistricting by Republicans elected in the 2010 elections enabled them to retain a majority in the House despite receiving far fewer votes nationwide in Congressional elections in 2012. With the increasing attempts to restrict voting by people opposed to their policies, they hope to continue their obstruction of any agenda, progressive or otherwise, until they can regain the Presidency, gain a majority in the Senate or both. Then they could pursue their anti-democratic (note the small d) agenda without the obstacles which losing the Presidency in 2008 presented. Similarly, The US Senate, despite having a Democratic majority, has been largely controlled by the GOP minority, which has delayed most Presidential nominations, some by years, and delayed the effective regulatory work of government agencies such as the NLRB and CFPB.

In the realm of secrecy, our government has become much more secretive since the terror attacks of 9/11. Spying, both abroad and at home, has increased dramatically since then. Much of this activity is kept secret from the vast majority of the population in the interests of “national security”. Anyone raising doubts about the necessity for such secrecy or any abuses of human or civil rights in the conduct of surveillance is at risk of prosecution as a result. The most prominent protagonists in this effort are Bradley Manning, suspected of being responsible for many of the leaks to Wikileaks, and Edward Snowden, responsible for recently making public the scope and depth of NSA spying, both domestically and abroad. The need for some secrecy in regard to such activities is not questioned by many, but the degree to which the surveillance has infringed upon our privacy and the extent of the information gathering has caused many to wonder if the oversight necessary to prevent abuse is sufficiently present. This is increasingly true even among the members of Congress tasked with providing the oversight and voting on legislation authorizing and funding it.

More
https://rcooley123.wordpress.com/2013/07/28/this-is-democracy/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»This Is Democracy?