Milbank: If united, Democrats can be effective against Trump
I watched from the House gallery Thursday afternoon when the Democrats socialist sensation, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in suffragist white, rose to announce her vote for speaker.
Nancy Pelosi, the 29-year-old firebrand declared.
From the Republican backbenches came boos and derisive groans.
Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, later complained about being singled out. Over 200 members voted for Nancy Pelosi today, yet the GOP only booed one: me, she tweeted. Dont hate me cause you aint me, fellas.
Actually, the Republicans love Ocasio-Cortez, in the same way Democrats love Mark Meadows and others among the Republicans far-right Freedom Caucus. They hate her politics, but they hope the young representative will sow division among Democrats. They were booing her because, this time, she didnt.
The decision by Ocasio-Cortez and others on the far left about whether to work with or against their party will determine the fate of the new majority and of the resurgent progressive movement. The Democrats return to power after wandering in the wilderness for eight years and 20 of the past 24 holds both great promise and great peril for them.
If they can stay unified, they will be an effective counterweight to the Trump lunacy, establishing the Democrats as the party to be entrusted with governing. But if they are split by internal divisions, they could become an easy foil for President Trump, lose suburban seats that gave them the House majority, and possibly hand Trump a second term.
The country is on fire. This is the time for Democrats to be the grown-ups voters want.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/milbank-if-united-democrats-can-be-effective-against-trump/
Me.
(35,454 posts)It won't work out so well for them. Things are too crucial.
dugog55
(296 posts)I wish people would quit using that term. If you look at the Democrat's policy platform, it is very close to what it was 50 years ago. Cripes, even Nixon thought health care costs were out of control and wanted some form of National Insurance or medical upgrade. I is because groups like the "Freedom Caucus" that are so far right they are in breathing distance of being Fascists, that makes it look like anyone for social safety net programs is a raging Liberal. There is no one in Congress right now that I would label as "Far Left". There are Democrats and some border line Blue Dogs. First and foremost, if the people of this country are not top priority in policy planning, they are not being liberal enough.