Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Book review: "Ruth Bader Ginsburg": The evolution of a justice
Edith Roberts
Posted Fri, January 11th, 2019 10:04 am
Book review: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The evolution of a justice
One might think that the market for treatments of the life and legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would be saturated by now. The past three years alone have seen the release of a carefully curated collection of the justices writings, My Own Words, a surprise hit documentary about her life and career, RBG, and a recent feature film, On the Basis of Sex, which focuses on the first sex-discrimination case Ginsburg argued in federal court. Now comes Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life, by Jane Sherron De Hart, a retired professor of history at the University of California, Santa Barbara. This book began as a research project examining Ginsburgs early career as a womens-rights litigator at the American Civil Liberties Union, and it expanded into a full-length biography (540 pages of text and 110 pages of footnotes).
Ginsburg spoke at length to the author during the early, limited part of the project, but she curtailed her cooperation later, likely because an authorized biography was (and remains) in the works. Whether because of De Harts own initial interest or the benefits of consultation with Ginsburg, the book is strongest when it focuses on Ginsburgs early life and her work before her appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. Readers will meet straight-A student and Brooklyn baton-twirler Kiki Bader, whose mother Celia died of cancer two days before Kikis high-school graduation. They will shake their heads at the notion that Ginsburg, although graduating at the top of her class from Columbia Law School, was offered a clerkship with a federal judge only after her law professor Gerald Gunther offered to substitute another (presumably male) candidate if Ginsburg did not pan out. And they will be touched by Ginsburgs enduring partnership with her husband, Marty, who, as Ginsburg has said, believed in me more than I believed in myself.
Some of De Harts most valuable insights come in her account of how Ginsburg, who, in an effort not [to] be considered confrontational, responded to Harvard Law School Dean Erwin Griswolds query about why she was occupying a place in the first-year class that could have gone to a man by saying it was important for her to understand her husbands work, came to espouse womens rights so whole-heartedly. De Hart traces some through lines that help explain how Ginsburg developed the ideas of equality that informed her determination to secure equal treatment for women under the law. Notable among these was a fortuitous sojourn in Sweden to research Swedish civil procedure. Ginsburg was struck by the greater gender equality Swedes enjoyed and by Swedish theorists and social scientists contention that culturally constructed roles stereotypical assumptions about the proper role of men and women imposed constraints on both sexes that penalized individuals and impoverished society.
Ginsburgs experiences in Sweden, coupled with the sexism she had experienced and the influence of feminist writers like Simone de Beauvoir, prompted her to helm the ACLUs new Womens Rights Project. Her analytical tenacity, single-minded focus on work, meticulous planning, and uncompromisingly high standards enabled her to devise and carry out her goals successfully. De Hart offers detailed accounts of the series of cases through which Ginsburg succeeded in persuading the Supreme Court to raise the standard of review for laws that treated men and women differently based on damaging stereotypes about gender roles. She observes, as have others before her, that Ginsburgs incremental approach building in small steps on early cases with sympathetic plaintiffs, often men was modeled on Justice Thurgood Marshalls strategy of combating racial discrimination as a litigator for the NAACP. But she also highlights the pitfalls of equating gender discrimination with racial discrimination, particularly as an increasingly conservative Supreme Court began to insist on a color blind approach to the Constitution that subjected affirmative action programs to strict scrutiny.
....
The author of this book review clerked for Ginsburg from 1989-1990 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of Ginsburgs nomination to the Supreme Court in 1993.
Recommended Citation: Edith Roberts, Book review: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The evolution of a justice, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 11, 2019, 10:04 AM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/book-review-ruth-bader-ginsburg-the-evolution-of-a-justice/
Posted Fri, January 11th, 2019 10:04 am
Book review: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The evolution of a justice
One might think that the market for treatments of the life and legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would be saturated by now. The past three years alone have seen the release of a carefully curated collection of the justices writings, My Own Words, a surprise hit documentary about her life and career, RBG, and a recent feature film, On the Basis of Sex, which focuses on the first sex-discrimination case Ginsburg argued in federal court. Now comes Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life, by Jane Sherron De Hart, a retired professor of history at the University of California, Santa Barbara. This book began as a research project examining Ginsburgs early career as a womens-rights litigator at the American Civil Liberties Union, and it expanded into a full-length biography (540 pages of text and 110 pages of footnotes).
Ginsburg spoke at length to the author during the early, limited part of the project, but she curtailed her cooperation later, likely because an authorized biography was (and remains) in the works. Whether because of De Harts own initial interest or the benefits of consultation with Ginsburg, the book is strongest when it focuses on Ginsburgs early life and her work before her appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. Readers will meet straight-A student and Brooklyn baton-twirler Kiki Bader, whose mother Celia died of cancer two days before Kikis high-school graduation. They will shake their heads at the notion that Ginsburg, although graduating at the top of her class from Columbia Law School, was offered a clerkship with a federal judge only after her law professor Gerald Gunther offered to substitute another (presumably male) candidate if Ginsburg did not pan out. And they will be touched by Ginsburgs enduring partnership with her husband, Marty, who, as Ginsburg has said, believed in me more than I believed in myself.
Some of De Harts most valuable insights come in her account of how Ginsburg, who, in an effort not [to] be considered confrontational, responded to Harvard Law School Dean Erwin Griswolds query about why she was occupying a place in the first-year class that could have gone to a man by saying it was important for her to understand her husbands work, came to espouse womens rights so whole-heartedly. De Hart traces some through lines that help explain how Ginsburg developed the ideas of equality that informed her determination to secure equal treatment for women under the law. Notable among these was a fortuitous sojourn in Sweden to research Swedish civil procedure. Ginsburg was struck by the greater gender equality Swedes enjoyed and by Swedish theorists and social scientists contention that culturally constructed roles stereotypical assumptions about the proper role of men and women imposed constraints on both sexes that penalized individuals and impoverished society.
Ginsburgs experiences in Sweden, coupled with the sexism she had experienced and the influence of feminist writers like Simone de Beauvoir, prompted her to helm the ACLUs new Womens Rights Project. Her analytical tenacity, single-minded focus on work, meticulous planning, and uncompromisingly high standards enabled her to devise and carry out her goals successfully. De Hart offers detailed accounts of the series of cases through which Ginsburg succeeded in persuading the Supreme Court to raise the standard of review for laws that treated men and women differently based on damaging stereotypes about gender roles. She observes, as have others before her, that Ginsburgs incremental approach building in small steps on early cases with sympathetic plaintiffs, often men was modeled on Justice Thurgood Marshalls strategy of combating racial discrimination as a litigator for the NAACP. But she also highlights the pitfalls of equating gender discrimination with racial discrimination, particularly as an increasingly conservative Supreme Court began to insist on a color blind approach to the Constitution that subjected affirmative action programs to strict scrutiny.
....
The author of this book review clerked for Ginsburg from 1989-1990 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of Ginsburgs nomination to the Supreme Court in 1993.
Recommended Citation: Edith Roberts, Book review: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The evolution of a justice, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 11, 2019, 10:04 AM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/book-review-ruth-bader-ginsburg-the-evolution-of-a-justice/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 609 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post