American military superiority will fade without bold national action
The National Defense Strategy Commission, a bipartisan panel mandated by Congress to evaluate our defense, recently issued its final report. It concluded that due to an erosion of American military superiority, The security and well being of the United States are at greater risk than at any time in decades. The report warned, If the nation does not act promptly to remedy these circumstances, the consequences will be grave and lasting. In other words, this crisis requires urgent action in Washington.
Ever since 9/11 and until more recently, the Defense Department has not received the timely or sufficient funding required to support operations, maintain readiness, and modernize American forces. As a result, the Pentagon has consistently been forced to postpone modernization to prioritize the preparedness of units immediately scheduled to deploy.
Meanwhile, China and Russia have worked to modernize their nuclear and conventional forces and expanded their capabilities. They now operate against us and our allies in increasingly contested domains such as space and cyber territories. They employ asymmetrical forms of economic, informational, and legal warfare to deplete American strength. Their goal is to exploit perceived American vulnerabilities. They ultimately seek to undermine the international order led by the United States that restrains aggressors while encouraging both political and economic freedom.
Washington has struggled to mount an effective response. American military superiority has deteriorated or vanished in significant defense capabilities, and the balance of power in strategic locations such as Eastern Europe and the Western Pacific has shifted to the benefit of our rivals and adversaries, thereby increasing the possibility of conflict.
https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/427175-american-military-superiority-will-fade-without-bold-national-action
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)they need a deep audit.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)government cheese. We spend more on our military than every other country combined. China has caught up a little bit but they're still way behind in many crucial areas and Russia had abandoned their plans for a fifth generation fighter for the simple reasons that they could not get it to work and it was too expensive.
Be very wary of articles like this warning that we are falling behind. It almost sounds like they're trying to sell you something.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Overall, we rate The Hill slightly Left-Center based on story selection that very slightly favors the left
and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing.
And you can read the report here, as linked in the OP:
National Defense Strategy Commission, a bipartisan panel issued its final report
https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2018-11/providing-for-the-common-defense.pdf
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I've seen so many garbage articles in The Hill over the years that I don't even pay attention to them anymore. I could care less what a study tells me. Here's their take on the recent elections:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/415437-the-blue-wave-ran-into-trumps-red-wall
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/410193-democrats-just-killed-the-blue-wave
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/412635-dems-lower-expectations-for-blue-wave
And as for the bipartisan report. You do realize that many of the individuals who wrote it probably get generous donations from the defense industry, don't you?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Writes, "not our opinion". Kelly Ayotte, former GOP Senator from NH and a male "former Senate aide" (former military officer too) wrote it. For a short while, Ayotte was palling around with McCain and Graham in the Senate, trying to pass themselves off as the all new 3 Musketeers, here to save America. Then, one
election day, voters said "buh-buy Kelly."
The Hill's opinion columns are totally strange; wing nuts, flying monkeys, Dershowitz and more.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Empires decline when the cost of defending territory gets too high. No matter how much we spend, it will never be enough. We need to operate over the entire globe against every possible attack. Russia and China can stay closer to home and pick their battles.
Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)All our aircraft carriers, submarines, and fighter jets couldn't save us from 19 Saudi Arabians armed with box-cutters. So we need more?
Nitram
(22,776 posts)superiority."
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)He is our most urgent and dangerous military weakness.