Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:28 AM Sep 2012

Court to feds: Stop deporting defense witnesses

One of the marks of the ubiquitous corruption of our justice system is precisely this sort of unethical prosecutorial behavior, which is now the norm. You want to know why we torture, assassinate, and imprison without limitation or recourse? This is why: our criminal justice system is rotten to the core, and at the same time arrogant.

Common sense and fairness would seem to dictate that the federal government ought not deport an exonerating witness before the witness has been allowed to testify. But good sense is apparently in short supply, at least that’s what the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeal said Friday in a sharply worded ruling.

"May the government deport an illegal alien who can provide exculpatory evidence for a criminal defendant before counsel for that defendant has even been appointed? We believe the answer is self-evident, as the government recognized in an earlier case where it moved to vacate a conviction after it deported witnesses whose testimony would have exculpated defendant," Judge Alex Kozinski wrote for the three judge panel.

The court is absolutely correct to rebuke the government and make clear "the unilateral deportation of witnesses favorable to a defense" is not permitted.

The case involves a man charged with alien smuggling. Border patrol agents arrested Jonathan Leal-Del Carmen in 2010. He and another man were charged with bringing a dozen immigrants illegally into the U.S. from Mexico. Three of the immigrants who were detained told agents that Leal-Del Carmen gave orders to the group or arranged for the journey. But one woman in the group told officers that Leal-Del Carmen did not issue orders. Officers asked her three times and each time she said Leal-Del Carmen was not the ringleader. In the end, three immigrants whose testimony helped the prosecution were allowed to remain in the U.S. as material witnesses. But the women, who presumably could have testified for the defense, was deported before Leal-Del Carmen was even arraigned. The jury never heard her testimony and Leal-Del Carmen was convicted on some of the charges against him.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-immigration-deport-witnesses-20120917,0,5059957.story
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court to feds: Stop deporting defense witnesses (Original Post) bemildred Sep 2012 OP
The extent that America is corrupt is breathtaking. Nt xchrom Sep 2012 #1
Disagree, it's not "America" that's corrupt but "American government". nt jody Sep 2012 #2
can you honestly separate the 2? nt xchrom Sep 2012 #3
Yes by excluding you and I from the corrupt group. On the other hand I'm not so sure about you. jody Sep 2012 #5
i'm not corrupt!11 -- just very, very, very Festive xchrom Sep 2012 #7
Did you mean "Feisty" instead of "Festive"? jody Sep 2012 #8
Festive. Miss Festive to you. nt xchrom Sep 2012 #9
The government is probably easier and quicker to fix. bemildred Sep 2012 #11
well, Miss Festive wants to believe you. xchrom Sep 2012 #13
Well, "we" are part of the problem too, not saying otherwise. bemildred Sep 2012 #14
Yes. This isn't the 50s - ThangGawd. xchrom Sep 2012 #16
Yep, "interesting times". But hey, we wanted change, right? bemildred Sep 2012 #18
Wow. Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #4
If government was not corrupt, then We the People would have the power to prevent abuses etc. jody Sep 2012 #6
I'm not denying that government is corrupt. Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #10
Agree "lack effective institutional means to do much about it." Many people have given up voting jody Sep 2012 #12
I intend to exercise my vote, as I always have. Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #15
I'll see your "Madison 2011" and raise you a "Jefferson/Madison 1798". nt jody Sep 2012 #17
The "States' Rights" approach to killing the Alien & Sedition Acts? Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #19
Yes. If that was still enforced, then "Madison 2011" might have been illegal. nt jody Sep 2012 #20
People around here know the dmnedest things… Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #22
Prosecutorial misconduct allows all kinds of people, i.e. Don Siegelman to be charged with midnight Sep 2012 #21
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
5. Yes by excluding you and I from the corrupt group. On the other hand I'm not so sure about you.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:41 AM
Sep 2012

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. The government is probably easier and quicker to fix.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:22 AM
Sep 2012

Just saying, I think Jody has a point.

"Yes, Miss Festive."

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
13. well, Miss Festive wants to believe you.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:28 AM
Sep 2012

but i think you'd have to do some kind of end run around how americans vote.

and the basic corruption of representatives when they do get elected.

marmar has thread up in good reads about how if we want change -- we have to build a real Left.

i agree -- but would also note that seems from this vantage point to be almost impossible.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
14. Well, "we" are part of the problem too, not saying otherwise.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:39 AM
Sep 2012

So it becomes a matter of consciousness raising, but you still have to talk about government, for consciousness raising, and government is where any future solution will be enacted, made into law and enforced or flouted, same as today. So I think we have two different sides of the same problem, and we neglect either side at our peril. In a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people", you see that the people have to be big players, but then they are players in the government.

And I have to say, looking back over my lifetime. we've had some good success with this consciousness raising stuff, we're far from done, but we've come a long way from what I remember too.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
16. Yes. This isn't the 50s - ThangGawd.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:44 AM
Sep 2012

We have made some Progress in consciousness.

But things are seeming precarious right now.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
18. Yep, "interesting times". But hey, we wanted change, right?
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:55 AM
Sep 2012

My primary motive to protect my health these days is so I can see how this all comes out, and I just might live long enough, the way things are going.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. Wow.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:41 AM
Sep 2012

The corporations stand as paragons of virtue in your universe?

The people behind the corruption of government?

The people who peddle GW denial, all forms of deregulation and corporate and bank bailouts, and who just generally behave like gangsters in the schoolyard, these people re not corrupt?

Where is your head?

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
6. If government was not corrupt, then We the People would have the power to prevent abuses etc.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:46 AM
Sep 2012

Corruption is the "effect".

What you address is the "cause".

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
10. I'm not denying that government is corrupt.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:12 AM
Sep 2012

If the corporations were not corrupt--or were at least restrained in the range of their corruption--then We the People would be able to clean up the government.

Anyway, I think we're engaging in some rather pointless debate here. The fact is that most of our major social and economic institutions have become massively corrupt, and we seem to lack effective institutional means to do much about it.

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
12. Agree "lack effective institutional means to do much about it." Many people have given up voting
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:25 AM
Sep 2012

just as many unemployed have given up looking for a job.

How much longer before enough people have simply given up and what happens then to the grand experiment in government called the United States?

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
15. I intend to exercise my vote, as I always have.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:42 AM
Sep 2012

I view re-electing Obama as a way of buying a little more time for the planet. That's a little more time for us to find non-institutional means. Like maybe some sort of massive cultural transformation. Such things have happened in the past, and are well documented in both the anthropological and historical literature.

I look to things like the spirit of Madison 2011, and that of the Occupy movement, as carrying the seeds of change.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
21. Prosecutorial misconduct allows all kinds of people, i.e. Don Siegelman to be charged with
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 05:02 PM
Sep 2012

crimes and go to prison....

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Court to feds: Stop depor...