Why I am no longer a Republican
http://news.yahoo.com/why-am-no-longer-republican-062500099.htmlSnip:
Why I am no longer a Republican
By Damon Linker | The Week 7 hrs ago.. .
It has a lot to do with the Iraq war.
This week has been filled with Iraq War recriminations and re-evaluations. While official Washington was strangely silent about the 10th anniversary of the start of the conflict, journalists and intellectuals have been (predictably) more vocal. Prominent neocons have reaffirmed, with minor caveats, their support for the war. Some (erstwhile) liberal hawks have issued full-throated mea culpas. Other liberals, meanwhile, have tried to have it both ways, denouncing the war they once supported while praising its outcome. And of course, lots of people who opposed the war from the beginning, on the right and left, have declared vindication.
My own position on the war fits into none of these categories. Ten years ago, I was working as an editor at First Things, a monthly magazine that's aptly been described as the New York Review of Books of the religious right. (And no, that's not oxymoronic.) The magazine strongly supported George W. Bush's original conception of the War on Terror, and so did I. In his speech to Congress and the nation on September 20, 2001, Bush stated that the United States would seek to decimate al Qaeda as well as every other terrorist groups of global reach. To this day I remain committed to that goal and willing to support aggressive military action (including the use of drone strikes) to achieve it. But thanks in large part to the Iraq war, I no longer consider myself a Republican or a man of the right.
denverbill
(11,489 posts)Hey says: "They (terrorists) are therefore undeterrable, which means that the only way to combat them is to destroy them." That's completely untrue.
The only way to combat terrorism is to destroy the motivation for terrorism. Bin Laden's stated motivation for terrorism was the US military presence in Saudi Arabia. Most terrorists now are recruited as freedom fighters against US (and Christian) imperialism.
Bring our troops home and there will be a lot less motivation to become terrorists.
supernova
(39,345 posts)agree completely.
But then again, people on the right don't display a lot of complex thinking about their ideas.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)Is a great first step.
Without an entire re-engineering of our imperialistic business practices, ending the war(s) will only allow those violently objecting to our presence, and the associated corruption, to continue to attack us.
Puppet governments, CIA incursions, natural resource grabbing, payoffs, military pushes...
All those policies need to change before we see a substantial decrease in the hatred from the Arab world that's grown from the Reagan years onward.
And it certainly wouldn't hurt to re-examine our policies towards and with Israel.
Armed Imperialism has to become a fact of the past. America must cut it's military budget by 2/3s, and remove the MIC as a ruling power in DC.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)What a jerkweed.
On the flip side, my chickenhawk teaparty father loved every policy of Ron Paul except one: His being relatively anti-war. It was an absolute deal breaker for him. Go figure.