Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Chilcot inquiry's focus on Bush-Blair secrets distracts us from disaster in plain sight
To have any relevance, the Chilcot inquiry should extend its brief to cover all UK military interventions since the allianceThe decision to keep secret the full correspondence between George W Bush and Tony Blair instead of allowing the Chilcot inquiry to publish it has been rightly pilloried as a self-serving, dishonest attempt by politicians and civil servants to conceal their role in a disastrous war in Iraq.
By focusing public attention on exchanges between Bush and Blair that are to remain secret, the agreement between Sir John Chilcot and Sir Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, gives the impression that there are bodies still buried and yet to be unearthed. This diverts attention from the fact that the most evil-smelling of these bodies have always been in plain sight. Who really thinks that Blair and his coterie were truthful in saying they believed that Saddam Hussein with his weapons of mass destruction was a threat so great that it could not be contained without military action?
The Chilcot inquiry has turned into a sort of Gilbert and Sullivan comedy about the British establishment, dysfunctional in everything except hiding its own mistakes. More is at stake here than simply the evasion of responsibility for launching a war that turned into a fiasco. The ludicrous length of the inquiry shows a belief on the part of British politicians and civil service mandarins that they have nothing to learn from mistakes made in Iraq.
We know they learned nothing because the reasons and rhetoric used to justify the British part in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 were being trotted out again as British forces moved into Helmand Province in Afghanistan in 2006. A pretence of humanitarian concern for the Libyan people was used in 2011 to explain Natos intervention to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi, much as had happened in Iraq. Recall how a hypothetical massacre by Gaddafis forces at Benghazi was used as justification for Nato airstrikes. But when militiamen we had installed in power later carried out real massacres by firing anti-aircraft guns into crowds of protesters in Benghazi and Tripoli, there were only mouse-squeaks of concern from Washington and London.
in full: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-chilcot-inquirys-focus-on-bushblair-secrets-distracts-us-from-disaster-in-plain-sight-9466421.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 998 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Chilcot inquiry's focus on Bush-Blair secrets distracts us from disaster in plain sight (Original Post)
Jefferson23
Jun 2014
OP
They don't want to talk about policy because it is obvious they are not good at it.
bemildred
Jun 2014
#2
Yep, and they would have to explain things,which is the last thing they want to do. n/t
Jefferson23
Jun 2014
#3
Leme
(1,092 posts)1. well same in USA
spend lots of time about personality, personal guilt... and forget the main story.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. They don't want to talk about policy because it is obvious they are not good at it.
And same here in the USA too, yeah.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)3. Yep, and they would have to explain things,which is the last thing they want to do. n/t
bemildred
(90,061 posts)4. And they would be bragging their asses off if it came out well too.
It's a great racket. When things go well, you brag your ass off, when they don't you talk about something else. You don't even have to know what you are doing.