Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:47 PM Jun 2014

Western Sahara: Independence for Africa’s last colony?

Many African countries have been independent for 50 years or more. In fact, there is only one colony left on the African continent: Western Sahara. Looking at the Western Sahara conflict today, it seems like Gordian knot, a mission impossible, an arch-typical case of realpolitik. So will Western Sahara ever become an independent country, as promised by the UN and international law? And if so, will it at least have gained its independence when many of the other African countries are celebrating their 100th anniversary as independent countries, in other words in 50 years’ time?

Western Sahara was a Spanish colony for a hundred years, but in 1975 Morocco struck a deal with Spain that meant that Moroccan (and initially Mauritanian) troops and hundreds of thousands of Moroccan civilians colonized Western Sahara instead. Western Sahara’s indigenous population, the Saharawis, yet again had to go to war with a colonizer – a war that ended with Morocco colonizing the majority of Western Sahara, and with tens of thousands of Saharawis fleeing the bombardments and atrocities committed by the Moroccan army to Algeria, where they set up refugee camps that are still there today.

This is because powerful countries such as the USA and France (both permanent members of the UN Security Council), and the EU, are either blocking a solution, doing nothing or making matters worse by making trade agreements that include goods from occupied Western Sahara, thus legitimizing the occupation and giving Morocco an incentive to keep it up. And if oil is found off the coast of Western Sahara – and American company Kosmos Energy is drilling for it with the blessing of the Moroccans – there will be even less incentive for Morocco to leave.

While this is happening, both the Saharawis living in the occupied territories and the refugee camps in neighbouring Algeria live in a kind of personal and national limbo. Those in the occupied territories experience discrimination and daily human rights violations that are so bad, that Amnesty in their new anti-torture campaign has chosen to include Morocco / Western Sahara as one of the “five worst” countries in the world. Those in the camps live in one of the most inhospitable areas in the world, the so-called “Devil’s Garden” – a part of the desert where temperatures rise above 50 degrees C during the summer. There is a shortage of pretty much everything, including food, medicine, water and jobs.

http://stiffkitten.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/western-sahara-independence-for-africas-last-colony/


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Western Sahara: Independence for Africa’s last colony? (Original Post) undeterred Jun 2014 OP
Thanks for posting A Little Weird Jun 2014 #1
Probably they can't. Igel Jun 2014 #2
Good point A Little Weird Jun 2014 #3
International Campaign against Wall of Moroccan Occupation in Western Sahara undeterred Jun 2014 #4

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
1. Thanks for posting
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:47 PM
Jun 2014

It's weird, I was just looking at a map the other day and saw Western Sahara was marked as a disputed territory. I was wondering what the story was but hadn't looked it up yet. This article explained it pretty well.

I hope the Saharawi people can get justice.

Igel

(35,282 posts)
2. Probably they can't.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:58 PM
Jun 2014

Even sorting out what "justice" is can be a vexed problem.

Immigrants outnumber the "indigenous" population. That means either the immigrants will have, for reasons of "historical justice," be subjugated to the less-numerous indigenous population for language and culture, with space reserved for the indigenous nomadic population; or the indigenous population will lose out in the linguistic levelling that invariably happens if their language's use isn't supported naturally by contact with larger groups.

This problem surfaces constantly. It's a problem for First Peoples in Canada. Gal studied it extensively in Hungarian-German language shift in Hungarian-speaking areas under German control (i.e., Austria). There was a huge brouhaha over "helping" Latvian and Estonian in Baltic countries. The general outcome is that if the minority group isn't afforded some sort of privilege in Western thinking then they have no rights; if they are afforded some sort of privilege then the majority has no rights. Whatever the "historical justice" is, it really depends ultimately on how we view the ethnicities and sometimes "races" involved. People that will go to the mat for First Peoples in Canada or the Roma in the Czech Republic will roll their eyes when it comes to Sorbs in Germany or Slovenes in Austria.

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
3. Good point
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:19 PM
Jun 2014

I was viewing it very simplistically. What I was thinking was more along the lines of "I hope they get their own sovereign state, independent from Morocco".

You are right of course, the situation is complex and I don't really know what true justice would look like or if it's even possible. Hopefully they will at least end up with something better than the refugee camps described in the article.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
4. International Campaign against Wall of Moroccan Occupation in Western Sahara
Sun Jun 15, 2014, 04:06 PM
Jun 2014

London, June 14,2014 (SPS) - The International Campaign against the Wall of the Moroccan Occupation in Western Sahara has launched its website in four languages. “We hope that the new site would become an interactive forum for exchanging ideas, information and experiences amongst us so that we all could move the campaign forward,” said Coordinator of the Campaign Dr. Sidi Omar, in a statement.

The 38th Conference of the European Coordination of Support to the Sahrawi People (EUCOCO) held in Rome, Italy, from 15 to 16 November 2013, adopted a decision regarding the launching of an international campaign against the Moroccan wall in Western Sahara. The campaign is called: “The International Campaign against the Wall of Moroccan Occupation in Western Sahara: together to remove the wall”, and is based on three main pillars: the wall, mines and mine victims.

The main objective of the campaign is to muster all possible support from policymakers and international public opinion to compel the occupying Moroccan State to comply with the rules of international humanitarian law and demilitarise the wall, neutralise and remove the entire arsenal of destruction that it contains including antipersonnel and anti-tank landmines and explosive remnants of war.

The Campaign represents a diverse coalition of national and international organisations, NGOs, grassroots movements and individuals working for a mine-free Western Sahara and for the respect for the right of the Sahrawi people to self-determination. Its membership currently includes:
Austria: Austrian Sahrawi Association,
France: Friends of the People of Western Sahara,
International: European Coordination of Support for the Sahrawi people (EUCOCO), International Platform of Jurists for East Timor (IPJET), Network of Studies on the Effects of Landmines and Walls in the Western Sahara,
México: ART- Sahara México
Netherlands: Foundation for Self-determination in Western Sahara, Pedro Pinto Leite, international jurist,
Spain: Coordination of Spanish Associations of Solidarity with Western Sahara, Give Voice to the Victims, Leonardo Urrutia Segura, writer and journalist,
UK: Western Sahara Action Forum (WSAF), Western Sahara Campaign UK, Joanna Allan, PhD Student, Violeta Ruano, PhD Student
Western Sahara: Association of Families of Sahrawi Prisoners and Disappeared (AFAPREDESA), National Union of Sahrawi Women (UNMS), Platform of “Cries against the Moroccan Wall”, Sahrawi Association of Mine Victims (ASAVIM), Sahrawi Mine Action Coordination Office (SMACO).

In addition to its enduring humanitarian, social, economic, political, legal and environmental effects, the wall (known as the Wall of Shame) also represents a persistent crime against the human rights of the Sahrawi people and a major impediment to the realisation of their inalienable right to self-determination and independence. (SPS)

Website is at http://removethewall.org/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Western Sahara: Independe...