Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 08:43 AM Jun 2014

Q&A In 'How Not to Be Wrong' Jordan Ellenberg makes math meaningful

June 18, 2014, 10:45 AM
By Carolyn Kellogg

In "How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking," Jordan Ellenberg writes about when it's a good idea to buy lottery tickets, why tall parents have shorter children, a dead fish in an MRI machine, and overperforming mutual funds. Because he's a mathematician at the University of Wisconsin, these come with handwritten graphs and equations, but his explanations are cultural, his references literary. Ellenberg is a contributor to Slate, and his book debuted on the extended bestseller list at the New York Times last week. He's currently on book tour and answered our questions by email.

It seems like the kind of math you practice at the University of Wisconsin (non-abelian Iwasawa theory! Galois representations!) is very different from the relatively accessible concepts you explain in “How Not to Be Wrong.” I’ve been trying to think of a metaphor – an opera singer teaching nursery rhymes? How do you think of the project of explaining math to non-math-heads?.

It would be a different world if there were a commercial market for non-abelian Iwasawa theory! But it’s not quite like teaching nursery rhymes; maybe more like a composer teaching the basic idea of the scale and of chords. The ideas I talk about in the book — like linearity, expected value, correlation, formalism — are not “baby” ideas, they’re really deep ideas that people worked very hard to create. But at the same time, they’re ideas that, once they’ve been developed and articulated, can be explained quite simply.

Did you have an ideal reader in mind when you were writing, or early readers of the manuscript?

http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-jordan-ellenberg-how-not-to-be-wrong-20140617-story.html#page=1

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Q&A In 'How Not to Be Wrong' Jordan Ellenberg makes math meaningful (Original Post) rug Jun 2014 OP
I've started reading it. . . Borchkins Jun 2014 #1
... One of my favorites is the example of Abraham Wald, who’s working in a top-secret math lab struggle4progress Jun 2014 #2

Borchkins

(724 posts)
1. I've started reading it. . .
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:21 AM
Jun 2014

with my son. It's our summer reading project. My son is 12 and would rather do a million things than read, so it may take us a while. The UW alumni magazine had an article about the book, so I got it for the kindle.

B

struggle4progress

(118,275 posts)
2. ... One of my favorites is the example of Abraham Wald, who’s working in a top-secret math lab
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 03:44 AM
Jun 2014

in World War II, and the generals come to him and say, “The planes are coming back from Germany riddled with bullet holes, but there are more bullet holes on the fuselage, less on the engine — how much more armor should we put on the fuselage, where the bullet holes are? And Wald tells them, “No — you have to put the armor where the bullet holes AREN’T” ...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Q&A In 'How Not to Be...