Q&A In 'How Not to Be Wrong' Jordan Ellenberg makes math meaningful
June 18, 2014, 10:45 AM
By Carolyn Kellogg
In "How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking," Jordan Ellenberg writes about when it's a good idea to buy lottery tickets, why tall parents have shorter children, a dead fish in an MRI machine, and overperforming mutual funds. Because he's a mathematician at the University of Wisconsin, these come with handwritten graphs and equations, but his explanations are cultural, his references literary. Ellenberg is a contributor to Slate, and his book debuted on the extended bestseller list at the New York Times last week. He's currently on book tour and answered our questions by email.
It seems like the kind of math you practice at the University of Wisconsin (non-abelian Iwasawa theory! Galois representations!) is very different from the relatively accessible concepts you explain in How Not to Be Wrong. Ive been trying to think of a metaphor an opera singer teaching nursery rhymes? How do you think of the project of explaining math to non-math-heads?.
It would be a different world if there were a commercial market for non-abelian Iwasawa theory! But its not quite like teaching nursery rhymes; maybe more like a composer teaching the basic idea of the scale and of chords. The ideas I talk about in the book like linearity, expected value, correlation, formalism are not baby ideas, theyre really deep ideas that people worked very hard to create. But at the same time, theyre ideas that, once theyve been developed and articulated, can be explained quite simply.
Did you have an ideal reader in mind when you were writing, or early readers of the manuscript?
http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-et-jc-jordan-ellenberg-how-not-to-be-wrong-20140617-story.html#page=1
Borchkins
(724 posts)with my son. It's our summer reading project. My son is 12 and would rather do a million things than read, so it may take us a while. The UW alumni magazine had an article about the book, so I got it for the kindle.
B
struggle4progress
(118,275 posts)in World War II, and the generals come to him and say, The planes are coming back from Germany riddled with bullet holes, but there are more bullet holes on the fuselage, less on the engine how much more armor should we put on the fuselage, where the bullet holes are? And Wald tells them, No you have to put the armor where the bullet holes ARENT ...