Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A good Anthropocene
Fourteen years ago, when a frustrated Paul Crutzen blurted out the word Anthropocene at a scientific meeting in Mexico, the famous atmospheric chemist was expressing his despair at the scale of human damage to the Earth. So profound has been the influence of humans, Nobelist Crutzen and his colleagues later wrote, that the Earth has entered a new geological epoch defined by a single, troubling fact: the human imprint on the global environment has now become so large and active that it rivals some of the great forces of Nature in its impact on the functioning of the Earth system.
The science behind Crutzens claim is extensive and robust, and it centers on the profound and irreversible changes brought by global warming. Yet almost as soon as the idea of the Anthropocene took hold, people began revising its meaning and distorting its implications. A new breed of ecopragmatists welcomed the new epoch as an opportunity. They gathered around the Breakthrough Institute, a neogreen think tank founded by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, the authors of a controversial 2004 paper, The Death of Environmentalism. They do not deny global warming; instead they skate over the top of it, insisting that whatever limits and tipping points the Earth system might throw up, human technology and ingenuity will transcend them.
As carbon dioxide concentrations pass 400 ppm for the first time in a million years, and scientists warn of a United States baking in furnace-like summers by the 2070s, Shellenberger and Nordhaus write that by the end of the century nearly all of us will be prosperous enough to live healthy, free, and creative lives. The answer, they say, is not to change course but to more tightly embrace human power, technology, and the larger process of modernization.
The argument absolves us all of the need to change our ways, which is music to the ears of political conservatives. The Anthropocene is system-compatible.
The science behind Crutzens claim is extensive and robust, and it centers on the profound and irreversible changes brought by global warming. Yet almost as soon as the idea of the Anthropocene took hold, people began revising its meaning and distorting its implications. A new breed of ecopragmatists welcomed the new epoch as an opportunity. They gathered around the Breakthrough Institute, a neogreen think tank founded by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, the authors of a controversial 2004 paper, The Death of Environmentalism. They do not deny global warming; instead they skate over the top of it, insisting that whatever limits and tipping points the Earth system might throw up, human technology and ingenuity will transcend them.
As carbon dioxide concentrations pass 400 ppm for the first time in a million years, and scientists warn of a United States baking in furnace-like summers by the 2070s, Shellenberger and Nordhaus write that by the end of the century nearly all of us will be prosperous enough to live healthy, free, and creative lives. The answer, they say, is not to change course but to more tightly embrace human power, technology, and the larger process of modernization.
The argument absolves us all of the need to change our ways, which is music to the ears of political conservatives. The Anthropocene is system-compatible.
http://clivehamilton.com/the-new-environmentalism-will-lead-us-to-disaster/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 930 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A good Anthropocene (Original Post)
pscot
Jun 2014
OP
The technological pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by is just as fictitious as the theological one.
bemildred
Jun 2014
#2
HoosierCowboy
(561 posts)1. ...or turning into Venus
by any standard, the climate of Venus should resemble the climate of Sol Terra 3 (Earth). albeit a bit warmer but still comfortable. yet Venus is a literal Hell due to the green house gases in its atmosphere.
Often makes me wonder if the human race actually started there, and the few survivors of the catastrophe made it to the Earth and are about to do the same to an otherwise freezing planet.
..and when the Earth is boiling, will a few survivors that make it to Mars, never to return, start the same process over again?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. The technological pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by is just as fictitious as the theological one.
There is no pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by.