Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum45 Years After COINTELPRO FBI Continues to Monitor Activists
Chip Gibbons, Legal Fellow, says over 60 national groups have signed onto a letter calling on the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to investigate FBI and DHS's monitoring of activists - March 8, 2016Running time, 14 minutes approx.
Bio
Chip Gibbons is a Legal Fellow at the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Defending Dissent Foundation, where he heads the Activism is Not Terrorism Campaign, which focuses on protecting the rights of activists with an emphasis on the increased use of anti-terrorism legislation against non-violent activists and terrorism as a pretext for the surveillance of First Amendment protected activities. Additionally, he is a freelance writer and journalist whose work has appeared at Truthout, Counterpunch, and the Dissent NewsWire.
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=15836
Ford_Prefect
(7,873 posts)the so-called political and cultural "mainstream" are considered to be criminal, socially deviant, dangerous in some capacity and likely foils for foreign spies, if not tools of the same. If that sounds like stereotyping of the FBI I should point out that their own records support this observation. It is at least a regrettable legacy of Hoover's long tenure.
Members of these groups are seen as criminals of one kind or another due to the presumed illegal activities they are believed to be planning and participating in. Constitutional rights are not terms used in this class of law enforcement. It is considered to be a legalistic dodge by many at the bureau and in street level law enforcement, based again on the assumption that anyone participating in "those" groups is likely to be a criminal if not a pawn of one.
Not that any of this is probably news to most of DU. The various Intel organs that have evolved have long based their views on evidence derived from FBI files, among other similarly biased sources.
That we still today have COINTELPRO style operations points to the longevity of those views and attitudes, along with the pernicious attitude of many in "law enforcement" that those in power are blessed by god and have all the requisite authority to define what is right and legal without reference to Congress, the Constitution, or the citizens and taxpayers on whom their activities prey.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . that the Church Committee was nothing more than an elaborate piece of political theater, intended to soothe the public's ruffled feathers, while behind the scenes, the FBI continued to get a wink and a nod from presidential administrations and Congress both.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Because they criticized the Wall Street fraudsters.
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)So long as a group is seen as a threat, it would be negligent to not try to monitor and disrupt them. And an intelligence agency (which is what the FBI is, in this context: counter-intellegence) is supposed to be paranoid. It is the job of the representatives of the people to reel them in. Not to encourage them.
-- Mal
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)inadvertently become a place where asinine conspiracy theories come to thrive
not die.
The abuse of power is ripe..when you see the list that includes the KKK and
civil rights activists..a clear sign they identify "threats" to US security very differently
than you or I.