Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:20 PM Mar 2016

45 Years After COINTELPRO FBI Continues to Monitor Activists

Chip Gibbons, Legal Fellow, says over 60 national groups have signed onto a letter calling on the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to investigate FBI and DHS's monitoring of activists - March 8, 2016


Running time, 14 minutes approx.


Bio

Chip Gibbons is a Legal Fellow at the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Defending Dissent Foundation, where he heads the Activism is Not Terrorism Campaign, which focuses on protecting the rights of activists with an emphasis on the increased use of anti-terrorism legislation against non-violent activists and terrorism as a pretext for the surveillance of First Amendment protected activities. Additionally, he is a freelance writer and journalist whose work has appeared at Truthout, Counterpunch, and the Dissent NewsWire.


http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=15836
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
45 Years After COINTELPRO FBI Continues to Monitor Activists (Original Post) Jefferson23 Mar 2016 OP
It has been an article of faith since the beginning of the FBI that all groups seen as "outside" Ford_Prefect Mar 2016 #1
Outstanding post, thank you. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #2
I am increasingly coming around to the belief . . . markpkessinger Mar 2016 #3
Thank you for posting. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #4
They had plans to assassinate Occupy protestors. Why? Enthusiast Mar 2016 #5
Let's be fair, they would be failing in their duty if they did not. malthaussen Mar 2016 #6
To an extent, yet the main problem is they end up acting in concert and they also Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #7

Ford_Prefect

(7,873 posts)
1. It has been an article of faith since the beginning of the FBI that all groups seen as "outside"
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:55 PM
Mar 2016

the so-called political and cultural "mainstream" are considered to be criminal, socially deviant, dangerous in some capacity and likely foils for foreign spies, if not tools of the same. If that sounds like stereotyping of the FBI I should point out that their own records support this observation. It is at least a regrettable legacy of Hoover's long tenure.

Members of these groups are seen as criminals of one kind or another due to the presumed illegal activities they are believed to be planning and participating in. Constitutional rights are not terms used in this class of law enforcement. It is considered to be a legalistic dodge by many at the bureau and in street level law enforcement, based again on the assumption that anyone participating in "those" groups is likely to be a criminal if not a pawn of one.

Not that any of this is probably news to most of DU. The various Intel organs that have evolved have long based their views on evidence derived from FBI files, among other similarly biased sources.

That we still today have COINTELPRO style operations points to the longevity of those views and attitudes, along with the pernicious attitude of many in "law enforcement" that those in power are blessed by god and have all the requisite authority to define what is right and legal without reference to Congress, the Constitution, or the citizens and taxpayers on whom their activities prey.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
3. I am increasingly coming around to the belief . . .
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 02:19 AM
Mar 2016

. . . that the Church Committee was nothing more than an elaborate piece of political theater, intended to soothe the public's ruffled feathers, while behind the scenes, the FBI continued to get a wink and a nod from presidential administrations and Congress both.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
6. Let's be fair, they would be failing in their duty if they did not.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:24 AM
Mar 2016

So long as a group is seen as a threat, it would be negligent to not try to monitor and disrupt them. And an intelligence agency (which is what the FBI is, in this context: counter-intellegence) is supposed to be paranoid. It is the job of the representatives of the people to reel them in. Not to encourage them.

-- Mal

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
7. To an extent, yet the main problem is they end up acting in concert and they also
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:06 AM
Mar 2016

inadvertently become a place where asinine conspiracy theories come to thrive
not die.

The abuse of power is ripe..when you see the list that includes the KKK and
civil rights activists..a clear sign they identify "threats" to US security very differently
than you or I.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»45 Years After COINTELPRO...